Re: sendmail & Verizon

2013-03-06 Thread Robert Nichols
On 03/05/2013 10:22 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: On 03/05/2013 05:45 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Configure_sendmail_as_a_client_for_SMTPs Yeah, I read that. It looks like a start. I already have stunnel installed (for what I can't remember, I thought it was my

Re: sendmail & Verizon

2013-03-06 Thread Kevin Cummings
Awesome! The stunnel trick works! 1) I set up /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf as in the Fedora Wiki example (I used port 25025). 2) I then ran "stunnel" from root. [I'll have to put that in rc.local before I reboot.] 3) In sendmail.mc, I used: define(`SMART_HOST', `relay:[localhost]') define(`RE

Re: sendmail & Verizon

2013-03-05 Thread Joe Zeff
On 03/05/2013 09:47 PM, Michael E. Maher wrote: Sounds like your best bet is to use stunnel. I don't have a reference for sendmail but you could probably adapt the one for postfix[0] pretty trivially. Debian also has a pretty nice write up[1] on this. There is one other possibility, but it's n

Re: sendmail & Verizon

2013-03-05 Thread Michael E. Maher
Hi, On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 22:36 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > I'm not sure what this proves as so many hosts these days are configure > to not respond to pings, so they can't be DDOSed via ping. Yeah does seem more common now. > > > Then see if you can open a session using telnet on all the

Re: sendmail & Verizon

2013-03-05 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 03/05/2013 05:45 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > > The simple answer is that sendmail can't do that by itself as it has no > support for client-side SSL. You need to use a program such as _stunnel_ > to provide the encryption wrapper. Here is a fedoraproject wiki posting > that describes the basics

Re: sendmail & Verizon

2013-03-05 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 03/04/2013 11:29 PM, Michael E. Maher wrote: > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 23:11 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> Sorry, just re-subscripbed after a long absence. Not sure if my >> original went through, so I'm resending. Sorry if it is a duplicate, I >> wouldn't have seen any of the early respons

Re: sendmail & Verizon

2013-03-05 Thread Robert Nichols
On 03/04/2013 10:11 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: NOW: Verizon wants to: 1) change the outgoing server name to smtp.verizon.net 2) change the port from 587 (MSA) to 465 (SMTPS), and 3) require SSL for communication. Sure, I can change my iPhone settings, and each Thunder

Re: sendmail & Verizon

2013-03-05 Thread Frantisek Hanzlik
Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > Sorry, just re-subscripbed after a long absence. Not sure if my > original went through, so I'm resending. Sorry if it is a duplicate, I > wouldn't have seen any of the early responses > > Once upon a time, I was using a standard, out of the box, sendmail > configu

Re: sendmail & Verizon

2013-03-04 Thread Michael E. Maher
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 23:11 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > Sorry, just re-subscripbed after a long absence. Not sure if my > original went through, so I'm resending. Sorry if it is a duplicate, I > wouldn't have seen any of the early responses > > Once upon a time, I was using a standard,