On 03/12/2015 07:45 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
Unless you have the drive under raid that means that 15 sectors cannot
be read and you have lost at least some data.
The drives normally will not move sectors that it cannot successfully read.
You may be able to copy the data off the disk, but you m
On 03/12/2015 03:58 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:37 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 03/12/2015 03:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
smarctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
# smartctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
smartctl 6.2 2014-07-16 r3952 [x86_64-linux-3.18.8-201.fc21.x86_64] (local
build)
Copyright (C) 2
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Unless you have the drive under raid that means that 15 sectors cannot
> be read and you have lost at least some data.
>
> The drives normally will not move sectors that it cannot successfully read.
>
> You may be able to copy the data off the
Unless you have the drive under raid that means that 15 sectors cannot
be read and you have lost at least some data.
The drives normally will not move sectors that it cannot successfully read.
You may be able to copy the data off the disk, but you may when trying
this find a lot more bad sectors
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Anyway, seeing as this happens on an fsck, that means filesystem
> metadata is affected and if e2fsck -f doesn't fix it then, the fs is
> toast. I honestly would just immediately remount it ro, and back it up
> though before forcing an fsck.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:37 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 03/12/2015 03:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> smarctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
>
> # smartctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
> smartctl 6.2 2014-07-16 r3952 [x86_64-linux-3.18.8-201.fc21.x86_64] (local
> build)
> Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian
On 03/12/2015 03:33 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 03/12/2015 04:03 PM, jd1008 wrote:
--
On 03/12/2015 01:37 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
smartctl --all /dev/sd
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGVALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 20
On 03/12/2015 03:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
smarctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
# smartctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
smartctl 6.2 2014-07-16 r3952 [x86_64-linux-3.18.8-201.fc21.x86_64]
(local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
SCT Error Recovery Control comm
On 03/12/2015 04:03 PM, jd1008 wrote:
--
On 03/12/2015 01:37 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
smartctl --all /dev/sd
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGVALUE WORST THRESH TYPEUPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail
Always - 0
196 Re
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> What do you get for:
> smarctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
smartctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
Helps to not have typos, and this command likes that additional t.
--
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:20 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> [ 117.660065] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb]
> [ 117.660703] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error - auto reallocate failed
What is sdb used for? Single drive or is it in some kind of raid?
This is a URE with failed reallocation which means the data and
checks
On 03/12/2015 01:52 PM, jd1008 wrote:
But... but now I have to back up what I can
and send it in for warranty.
True, but isn't that better than not having the warranty at all? And,
with some of the diagnostics others have suggested, you might not need
to send it back at all. Still, if you d
--
On 03/12/2015 01:37 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
smartctl --all /dev/sd
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGVALUE WORST THRESH TYPEUPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail
Always - 0
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200
But... but now I have to back up what I can
and send it in for warranty.
My point was more about how could I run out of spare
sectors when I have had no prior reports of hard sector
errors prior to this fsck?
On 03/12/2015 01:29 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/12/2015 12:20 PM, jd1008 wrote:
So, I
smartctl --all /dev/sdX and see how many are reallocated.
From my experience how many spare sectors there are depends on the
size and brand.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 12:20 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>>
>> So, I am puzzled as to how quickly were the spare sectors c
On 03/12/2015 12:20 PM, jd1008 wrote:
So, I am puzzled as to how quickly were the spare sectors consumed so that
automatic sector forwarding ran out os spare sectors? So quickly on a
brand new drive??
This is what warranties are for.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
16 matches
Mail list logo
