On 08/23/2010 12:17 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/22/2010 01:49 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm, yes, /etc/procmailrc runs it through spamc
>
> If that's the case, then the milter only really needs to reject messages
> with a suitably high score. You should probably also configu
On 08/22/2010 01:49 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>
> Hmmm, yes, /etc/procmailrc runs it through spamc
If that's the case, then the milter only really needs to reject messages
with a suitably high score. You should probably also configure it not
to modify the body or headers.
--
users mail
On 08/22/2010 02:12 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/20/2010 09:39 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>> It looks like sa-milt is getting a-hold of the message first, and
>> marking it as [SPAM] with a score of 6.2. Then it looks like its
>> getting run again
>
> Yeah, I'm not terribly sure. Hone
On 08/20/2010 09:39 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> It looks like sa-milt is getting a-hold of the message first, and
> marking it as [SPAM] with a score of 6.2. Then it looks like its
> getting run again
Yeah, I'm not terribly sure. Honestly, I haven't run Sendmail on a mail
server in close
On 08/20/2010 12:16 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 09:50 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>>
>> I did that yesterday. No new SPAM markings on my hourly emails, though
>> some of my other admin emails are now getting marked as [SPAM], like a
>> couple of denyhosts reports. One of them had a
On 08/17/2010 09:50 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>
> I did that yesterday. No new SPAM markings on my hourly emails, though
> some of my other admin emails are now getting marked as [SPAM], like a
> couple of denyhosts reports. One of them had a -2.6 SPAM level
I suppose you could post those
On 08/17/2010 11:33 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/15/2010 09:15 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>>
>> My 11:00 email got marked as [SPAM], here are the email headers:
> ...
>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
>>> FRT_ADOBE2,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NUMERIC_HTTP_A
On 08/15/2010 09:15 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>
> My 11:00 email got marked as [SPAM], here are the email headers:
...
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
>> FRT_ADOBE2,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX
>> autolearn=no
>> version
On 08/16/2010 12:00 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/15/2010 04:40 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>>
>> The "From" address is: r...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
>> which makes sense since it is being run directly as a cron.hourly
>> script. I have added this whitelist_from_rcvd to
>> /etc/mail/spamassa
On 08/15/2010 04:40 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>
> The "From" address is: r...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
> which makes sense since it is being run directly as a cron.hourly
> script. I have added this whitelist_from_rcvd to
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.
whitelist_from_rcvd also requires the
Gordon,
Thanks for your rely.
On 08/15/2010 03:20 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/14/2010 07:29 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>>
>> Can someone please tell me where I can either configure sendmail to
>> save these somewhere for me, or how I can get SpamAssassin to not drop
>> these s
On 08/14/2010 07:29 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>
> Can someone please tell me where I can either configure sendmail to
> save these somewhere for me, or how I can get SpamAssassin to not drop
> these system "logwatch" emails (and *only* these logwatch emails) on the
> floor.
Check the man
12 matches
Mail list logo
