Re: ~/rpmbuild directory can't be a symlink?

On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 22:16:09 +0100 Barry wrote: > > On 6 Jul 2023, at 15:08, Franta Hanzlík via users > > wrote: > > > > But sometimes I need to build an RPM package "in the field", at my > > colleagues/friends/... machines - and I don't use the ~/.rpmmacros > > Why not put the one line in t

Re: ~/rpmbuild directory can't be a symlink?

> On 6 Jul 2023, at 15:08, Franta Hanzlík via users > wrote: > > But sometimes I need to build an RPM package "in the field", at my > colleagues/friends/... machines - and I don't use the ~/.rpmmacros Why not put the one line in the .rpmmacros when off site, i am curious? It is surely no less

Re: ~/rpmbuild directory can't be a symlink?

On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 09:42:30 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 05:59:05 +0200 > Franta Hanzlík via users wrote: > > > The problem seems to be somehow caused by ~/rpmbuild being a symlink ( > > If a symlink is the problem, you could always set up a ~/.rpmmacros > file with the line:

Re: ~/rpmbuild directory can't be a symlink?

On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 05:59:05 +0200 Franta Hanzlík via users wrote: > The problem seems to be somehow caused by ~/rpmbuild being a symlink ( If a symlink is the problem, you could always set up a ~/.rpmmacros file with the line: %_topdir /path/to/real/rpmbuild

Re: rpmbuild perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot

* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog * Sat Jun 19 2021 Patrick Dupre 0.74-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. > Subject: Re: rpmbuild perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 9:00 AM Patrick Dupre wrote: > > This spec file provide the an error. > > Can you help m

Re: rpmbuild perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot

On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 9:00 AM Patrick Dupre wrote: > This spec file provide the an error. > Can you help me to fix it? You didn't show the compiler flags in use, so this is just a guess, but ... > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors ... this message suggests that -Werror is included.

Re: rpmbuild

On 6/15/19 1:10 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Another question How could I get %{_bindir}/* added in the %files section without having to edit the generated .spec file (i.e. when I run cpanspec)? You would have to modify cpanspec to substitute that. ___ us

Re: rpmbuild

=== > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 at 5:41 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:38:56 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22-1.fc30.noa

Re: rpmbuild

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:38:56 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22-1.fc30.noarch > The solutions that I found are: > 1) add Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release} > in perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry.spec > or > 2) remove > BuildRequires: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) >= 4.63

Re: rpmbuild

On 6/14/19 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: 1) I expect that I would have to edit the .spec file That's right.  You do.  And that's expected. http://cpanspec.sourceforge.net/ indicates: "It is assumed that maintainers will need to do some (hopefully small) amount of work to clean up the genera

Re: rpmbuild

== > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 at 7:06 PM > From: "Gordon Messmer" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild > > On 6/12/19 1:43 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz > &g

Re: rpmbuild

On 6/12/19 1:43 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz only add: BuildRequires: perl-generators in the .spec file which does not help. Sure, it does.  The purpose of the "perl-generators" package is to include information about wha

Re: rpmbuild

On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:09:58 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Maybe, however, some perl packages require packages with a version > number higher than a certain value. > Thus, if the Provides/Requires instructions are not set properly, > all the packages requiring other packages fail, either at the bu

Re: rpmbuild

> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:43:24 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Again, I am not sure to understand: > > > > cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz > > > > only add: > > BuildRequires: perl-generators > > in the .spec file > > > > which does not h

Re: rpmbuild

On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:43:24 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Again, I am not sure to understand: > > cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz > > only add: > BuildRequires: perl-generators > in the .spec file > > which does not help. It helps with auto

Re: rpmbuild

Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 at 4:50 AM > From: "Samuel Sieb" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild > > On 6/12/19 1:43 PM, Patrick

Re: rpmbuild

On 6/12/19 1:43 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Again, I am not sure to understand: cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz only add: BuildRequires: perl-generators in the .spec file which does not help. The spec file you get from cpanspec will need to be modified

Re: rpmbuild

at 2:26 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:13:10 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > I am not sure to take the point: > > You focus on something else. > > > I can run

Re: rpmbuild

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:13:10 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I am not sure to take the point: You focus on something else. > I can run > cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz > --add-provide "perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) %{version}-%{release}" > > If it is correct.

Re: rpmbuild

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/11/19 12:13 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: >> Again, why the generation of the .spec is not automatic? > > Because the script isn't perfect and it's a difficult problem to solve. > cpanspec appears to be pretty dead upstream. You could try filing a bug in > Fedora bugzilla. F

Re: rpmbuild

On 6/11/19 12:13 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Again, why the generation of the .spec is not automatic? Because the script isn't perfect and it's a difficult problem to solve. cpanspec appears to be pretty dead upstream. You could try filing a bug in Fedora bugzilla.

Re: rpmbuild

Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 12:46 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:45:23 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Sorry, when I run > > cpanspec Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz >

Re: rpmbuild

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:45:23 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Sorry, when I run > cpanspec Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz I referred to _build time_ creation of inter-package dependencies. The step when rpmbuild adds Requires/Provides to the built packages. You are not supposed to hack a spec file as

Re: rpmbuild

rgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 at 5:22 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org >

Re: rpmbuild

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:35:22 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release} > > seems missing in the .spec file No. These are automatically created Provides/Requires for Perl Modules. You need to work with a package that _really_ includes and "Provides" th

Re: rpmbuild

Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release} seems missing in the .spec file === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Ave

Re: rpmbuild

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:10:54 +0200 "Patrick Dupre" wrote: > Same issue with Tk-JFileDialog.spec > In addition, I get: > rpmbuild -bb perl-Tk-JFileDialog.spec > error: Failed build dependencies: > perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) >= 4.63 is needed by > perl-Tk-JFileDialog-2.20-1.fc30.noarch > > whil

Re: rpmbuild

988 === > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 at 2:11 AM > From: "Gordon Messmer" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild > > On 6/9/19 2:27 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > RPM build error

Re: rpmbuild

On 6/9/19 2:27 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/JBrowseTest.pl Add that path to the %files section of the spec.  If you're maintaining this for redistribution, you might want to list the path as "%{_bindir}/JBrowseTest.pl"

Re: rpmbuild

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 08:38:05 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 6/9/19 7:29 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > How can I make a rpmbuild and keep the compiled files? > > > Have you tried "rpmbuild --noclean"? Alternatively, end the building after the %build stage: rpmbuild -bc foo.spec And you wi

Re: rpmbuild

On 6/9/19 7:29 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: How can I make a rpmbuild and keep the compiled files? Have you tried "rpmbuild --noclean"? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: rpmbuild error

Hi, Thanks again! The spec file compiles fine but also does without libtool. Why do we need it? What more info would you like? I don't know what a desktop file does exactly, and I don't know why there is a file such as that in /etc/wbar.d, sorry. Many thanks and best wishes, Ranjan On Tue, 25

Re: rpmbuild error

Ranjan Maitra writes: RPM build errors: Macro expanded in comment on line 11: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Am2P0X (%build) I wonder: what is causing these errors? Line 11 of the file seems to be something else. Line 11 has nothing to do with t

Re: rpmbuild error

I played around a bit and built it in mock and found several dependencies you didn't have in the spec file. You didn't provide the desktop file so I commented it out but I noticed it puts one in /etc/wbar.d so I'm not sure what it's for... I can fix it up a bit more if you can provide more info.

Re: rpmbuild error

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:47 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 07:52:46 -0500 Richard Shaw > wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm > > > using a previously

Re: rpmbuild error

On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 07:52:46 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm > > using a previously written .spec file which I had created some time ago and > > which comp

Re: rpmbuild error

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm > using a previously written .spec file which I had created some time ago and > which compiled without incident till F27. Over time gcc gets more pedantic abou

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

lejeczek via users wrote: > It actually might be working. What I was doing I was looking for a > confirmation like this: > > $ ps -FC rpmbuild --cols > UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD > appmgr 24855 24835 0 44512 6772 16 17:33 pts/000:00:00 rpmbuil

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

On 11/06/18 17:07, lejeczek via users wrote: I'm sorry, I do not get it.. was I so hard to read? $ _def1="_me 1" $ rpmbuild --define \'"${_def1}"\' and no matter how I quote, how I escape bash's var, rpmbuild does not "react" to it. I run it from a bash script. I should mention I'm on Centos

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

lejeczek via users wrote: > I'm sorry, I do not get it.. was I so hard to read? > > $ _def1="_me 1" > $ rpmbuild --define \'"${_def1}"\' > > and no matter how I quote, how I escape bash's var, rpmbuild does not > "react" to it. I run it from a bash script. > I should mention I'm on Centos 7.5. RP

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

I'm sorry, I do not get it.. was I so hard to read? $ _def1="_me 1" $ rpmbuild --define \'"${_def1}"\' and no matter how I quote, how I escape bash's var, rpmbuild does not "react" to it. I run it from a bash script. I should mention I'm on Centos 7.5. RPM version 4.11.3 many thanks, L. _

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

On 09.06.2018 00:50, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 06/08/2018 03:24 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> On 08.06.2018 23:58, lejeczek via users wrote: >> >>> $ _def1="_me 1" >>> $ rpmbuild --define=${_def1} >> >> Try double quotes around your macro: >> >> $ rpmbuild --define "${_def1}" > > The man page specifies:

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

On 06/08/2018 03:24 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 08.06.2018 23:58, lejeczek via users wrote: > >> $ _def1="_me 1" >> $ rpmbuild --define=${_def1} > > Try double quotes around your macro: > > $ rpmbuild --define "${_def1}" The man page specifies: --define='MACRO EXPR' Meaning that the ma

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

lejeczek via users wrote: > On 08/06/18 16:39, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> lejeczek via users wrote: >>> how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg >>> >>> rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\' >>> >>> I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is fricking working.. >>> I mean, rpmb

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

On 08.06.2018 23:58, lejeczek via users wrote: > $ _def1="_me 1" > $ rpmbuild --define=${_def1} Try double quotes around your macro: $ rpmbuild --define "${_def1}" best regards Ulf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

On 08/06/18 16:39, Todd Zullinger wrote: Hi, lejeczek via users wrote: how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\' I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is fricking working.. I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor failure) so

Re: rpmbuild --define - some rpm sorcerer around?

Hi, lejeczek via users wrote: > how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg > > rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\' > > I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is fricking working.. > I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor failure) so if you try just > command line do

Re: rpmbuild

Hi, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I am trying to create a rpm file from a tgz package. > Could you help me? > > I have been here > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package > I run > rpmbuild -ba textext.spec > > Here is my file: > > Name: textext > Version:

Re: rpmbuild

> Den 2018-02-09 kl. 15:45, skrev Patrick Dupre: > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to create a rpm file from a tgz package. > > Could you help me? > > > > I have been here > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package > > I run > > rpmbuild -ba textext.spec > > > > Here i

Re: rpmbuild

Den 2018-02-09 kl. 15:45, skrev Patrick Dupre: > Hello, > > I am trying to create a rpm file from a tgz package. > Could you help me? > > I have been here > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package > I run > rpmbuild -ba textext.spec > > Here is my file: > > Name:

Re: rpmbuild

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 09:48:26PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Can somebody tell me whatis wrong in the spec file In addition to the other reply, some stylistic points ... > Group: Development/Libraries This is not needed. > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-

Re: rpmbuild

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:31:50 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > If you go on rpmfind.net > > perl-Forest > is supposed to provides > perl-Forest > perl(Forest) > > Since fedora does not offer perl-Forest, I have to build it from the tar file > Forest-0.10 > There is probably an issue with the spec?

Re: rpmbuild

> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 at 10:49 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild > > On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:42:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > > > Can somebody tell me whatis wron

Re: rpmbuild

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:42:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Can somebody tell me whatis wrong in the spec file > > > > > I get: > > > rpmbuild -bb perl-Graphics-Primitive.spec > > > error: Failed build dependencies: > > > perl(Forest) >= 0.06 is needed by > > > perl-Graphics-Primitive-

Re: rpmbuild

> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 at 10:14 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild > > On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:48:26 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Can somebody tell me whatis

Re: rpmbuild

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:48:26 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Can somebody tell me whatis wrong in the spec file > I get: > rpmbuild -bb perl-Graphics-Primitive.spec > error: Failed build dependencies: > perl(Forest) >= 0.06 is needed by > perl-Graphics-Primitive-0.67-1.fc26.noar

Re: rpmbuild --rebuiild with config options

On 08/18/2017 09:47 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: Thanks for the link. Looking at that, the spec file would need to be modified: %configure --with-dbus --with-gif --with-jpeg --with-png \ --with-rsvg --with-tiff --with-xft --with-xpm \ --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --with-gpm=no

Re: rpmbuild --rebuiild with config options

On 08/17/2017 07:14 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: >> I'm trying to put together a minimal emacs rpm and I'm trying this, with >> the ensuing error: >> >> rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-25.2-3.fc25.src.rpm --without-all >> rpmbuild: --without-all: unknow

Re: rpmbuild --rebuiild with config options

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > I'm trying to put together a minimal emacs rpm and I'm trying this, with > the ensuing error: > > rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-25.2-3.fc25.src.rpm --without-all > rpmbuild: --without-all: unknown option Looking at the emacs spec (available at ht

Re: rpmbuild --rebuiild with config options

On 08/17/2017 06:10 PM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:30:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 08/17/2017 09:22 AM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: >>> Actually I compiled, out of curiosity, the tar file that came with the >>> srpm, with >>> >>> ./configure --without-all --with-x-toolkit=no --wit

Re: rpmbuild --rebuiild with config options

On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:30:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/17/2017 09:22 AM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: >> Actually I compiled, out of curiosity, the tar file that came with the >> srpm, with >> >> ./configure --without-all --with-x-toolkit=no --without-x >> >> and worked very well. So these are valid

Re: rpmbuild --rebuiild with config options

Amadeus W.M. wrote: Actually I compiled, out of curiosity, the tar file that came with the srpm, with ./configure --without-all --with-x-toolkit=no --without-x and worked very well. So these are valid options. Don't know why rpmbuild doesn't like those. It would have been nice to have an rpm

Re: rpmbuild --rebuiild with config options

On 08/17/2017 09:22 AM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > Actually I compiled, out of curiosity, the tar file that came with the > srpm, with > > ./configure --without-all --with-x-toolkit=no --without-x > > and worked very well. So these are valid options. Don't know why rpmbuild > doesn't like those. It w

Re: rpmbuild --rebuiild with config options

On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:04:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/17/2017 07:50 AM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: >> I'm trying to put together a minimal emacs rpm and I'm trying this, >> with the ensuing error: >> >> rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-25.2-3.fc25.src.rpm --without-all rpmbuild: >> --without-all: unknown

Re: rpmbuild --rebuiild with config options

On 08/17/2017 07:50 AM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > I'm trying to put together a minimal emacs rpm and I'm trying this, with > the ensuing error: > > rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-25.2-3.fc25.src.rpm --without-all > rpmbuild: --without-all: unknown option > > I untarred the emacs source code and ran ./config

Re: rpmbuild

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:50:50AM -0400, Bill Shirley wrote: > I just recently build a spec file for ndppd (NDP Proxy Daemon) and found out > you can't comment out by using a single # in a spec file if it is a % command. > It has to be like this: > #%%configure Yeah, this is because macros are ex

Re: rpmbuild

I just recently build a spec file for ndppd (NDP Proxy Daemon) and found out you can't comment out by using a single # in a spec file if it is a % command. It has to be like this: #%%configure ndppd: https://github.com/DanielAdolfsson/ndppd Do not build rpm's as root. Set up a build tree using

Re: rpmbuild

On 18/07/17 18:07, John Pilkington wrote: On 18/07/17 17:07, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I am trying to patch gnuplot with https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/patches/694/ However, it fails for several reasons, The first one is that the patch does not apply to last version of tabulate.c (maybe t

Re: rpmbuild

Patrick Dupre wrote: I am trying to patch gnuplot with https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/patches/694/ However, it fails for several reasons, The first one is that the patch does not apply to last version of tabulate.c (maybe to a previous one). Then a fixed directly the tabulate.c file How

Re: rpmbuild

On 18/07/17 17:07, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I am trying to patch gnuplot with https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/patches/694/ However, it fails for several reasons, The first one is that the patch does not apply to last version of tabulate.c (maybe to a previous one). Then a fixed directly th

Re: rpmbuild

On 07/18/2017 09:07 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to patch gnuplot with > https://sourceforge.net/p/gnuplot/patches/694/ > > However, it fails for several reasons, > The first one is that the patch does not apply to last version > of tabulate.c (maybe to a previous one). > Th

Re: rpmbuild

ue, France === > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 at 1:48 PM > From: "Michael Schwendt" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild > > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:58:53 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > rpmbuil

Re: rpmbuild

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:58:53 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > rpmbuild -bb > and I got the following error message: > RPM build errors: > File not found: > /home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-PAR-Packer-1.035-1.fc24.x86_64/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/* > File not found: > /home/pdupre/

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 20:24:05 +0200 Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 3 October 2016 at 15:38, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray > > as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a > > rpm and perhaps an

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On 3 October 2016 at 15:38, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as > a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm > and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora. > > I have created the following spec

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On 10/03/2016 10:04 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote: > >> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500 >> Ranjan Maitra wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across >>> battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:44:41 -0700 stan wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:04:31 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Sorry, here is the corrected > > > > $ fpaste battray.spec > > Uploading (1.6KiB)... > > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714/ -> > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:04:31 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Sorry, here is the corrected > > $ fpaste battray.spec > Uploading (1.6KiB)... > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714/ -> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714 I think this is still wrong. It might not be the probl

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across > > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it > > together as a rpm and perhaps

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:30:44 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote: > On 10/03/2016 06:38 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray > > as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a > > rpm and perhaps and g

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across > > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it > > together as a rpm and perhaps

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it > together as a rpm and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora. > > I have created the followi

Re: rpmbuild: compiles without error but does not install

On 10/03/2016 06:38 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as > a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm > and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora. > > I have created the following spec fi

Re: rpmbuild for cmake project error :: Found 'build_dir' in installed files

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:33:08 +0300 Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > Hi! I have a head scratching problem with a project (clhep) that i > try to package. It is cmake based and the spec file can be seen here: > https://github.com/adriansev/SPECS/blob/master/clhep.spec > > the error that i get is : > Found

Re: rpmbuild error (wbar) on F24

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:56:52 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:35:39 +0200 Michael Schwendt > wrote: > > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:44:59 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > > > Revisit the build output and look for a real error message from > > > > the compiler, not these th

Re: rpmbuild error (wbar) on F24

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:35:39 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:44:59 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > Revisit the build output and look for a real error message from the > > > compiler, not these that Make prints. > > > > Where is this build output? I get the following

Re: rpmbuild error (wbar) on F24

On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 18:09 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > So, how should I fix this? Is this something that has to be taken > care of, upstream? The normal procedure, as a package maintainer, would be for you to fix it by writing a patch, applying the patch to your spec file, and submit the pat

Re: rpmbuild error (wbar) on F24

Michael, Thanks! > Here: > > > ../src/core/Main.cc:84:35: error: invalid suffix on literal; C++11 requires > > a space between literal and string macro [-Werror=literal-suffix] > > command = PACKAGE_NAME" "DEFAULT_ARGV; > > And the line above that is the full invocation of the com

Re: rpmbuild error (wbar) on F24

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:44:59 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > Revisit the build output and look for a real error message from the > > compiler, not these that Make prints. > > Where is this build output? I get the following complete output when I use: Here: > ../src/core/Main.cc:84:35: error:

Re: rpmbuild error (wbar) on F24

Michael, Thanks! On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:44:39 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 09:26:29 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a local rpm that I have created using wbar. The spec file is here: > > > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/384973/14669508 > > > >

Re: rpmbuild error (wbar) on F24

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 09:26:29 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > I have a local rpm that I have created using wbar. The spec file is here: > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/384973/14669508 > > I have successfully created this rpm up to Fedora 23. But have been unable to > do so this time a

Re: rpmbuild

Allegedly, on or about 05 June 2016, Kevin Cummings sent: > (Sorry, I can't remember where I got them from. "yum list all > cnijfilter\*" won't tell me anything other than installed, therefore > I probably got them directly from Canon.) If you installed and RPM without using YUM, you ought to b

Re: rpmbuild

On 06/06/16 03:13, Kevin Cummings wrote: > On 06/05/16 06:06, John Pilkington wrote: >> You don't say why you need to compile; I have an MG4250 scanner/printer >> which works for me in SL7 with cnijfilter-mg4200series-3.80-1-rpm >> >> There appear to be two similar sets of *.rpm.tar.gz packages

Re: rpmbuild

On 06/05/16 06:06, John Pilkington wrote: > You don't say why you need to compile; I have an MG4250 scanner/printer > which works for me in SL7 with cnijfilter-mg4200series-3.80-1-rpm > > There appear to be two similar sets of *.rpm.tar.gz packages (v2.20 and > v4.00) for the mg5500 series here:

Re: rpmbuild

On 05/06/16 10:14, Timothy Murphy wrote: Ed Greshko wrote: I'm trying to compile Canon's Linux driver for my Canon MG5550 printer, and the instructions tell me to run "rpmbuild". Isn't it as simply as [egreshko@f24b ~]$ dnf whatprovides *bin/rpmbuild Last metadata expiration check: 0:00

Re: rpmbuild

Ed Greshko wrote: >> I'm trying to compile Canon's Linux driver for my Canon MG5550 printer, >> and the instructions tell me to run "rpmbuild". > Isn't it as simply as > > [egreshko@f24b ~]$ dnf whatprovides *bin/rpmbuild > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:33 ago on Sat Jun 4 21:50:19 2

Re: rpmbuild

On 4 June 2016 at 14:43, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm trying to compile Canon's Linux driver for my Canon MG5550 printer, > and the instructions tell me to run "rpmbuild". > When I consult < > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package> > (dated 23 May 2016) > I'm told to dnf-inst

Re: rpmbuild

On 06/04/16 20:43, Timothy Murphy wrote: > [root@william tim]# dnf install mock > Error: package mock-1.2.17-1.fc24.noarch requires systemd-container, > but none of the providers can be installed > > Is this because I am running Fedora-24 beta? And, FWIW, on my fully updated F24 beta system (K

Re: rpmbuild

On 06/04/16 21:51, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 06/04/16 20:43, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> I'm trying to compile Canon's Linux driver for my Canon MG5550 printer, >> and the instructions tell me to run "rpmbuild". >> When I consult >> (dat

Re: rpmbuild

On 06/04/16 20:43, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm trying to compile Canon's Linux driver for my Canon MG5550 printer, > and the instructions tell me to run "rpmbuild". > When I consult > (dated 23 May 2016) > I'm told to dnf-install fedora

  1   2   >