On 04/23/11 06:21, James Wilkinson wrote:
> g wrote:
>> latest flash is 10.2.159.1.
>>
>> anything prior has security and crash problems.
> Craig White objected:
>> the implication being that the specific version mentioned doesn't have
>> known security and crash problems which I think both have be
g wrote:
> latest flash is 10.2.159.1.
>
> anything prior has security and crash problems.
Craig White objected:
> the implication being that the specific version mentioned doesn't have
> known security and crash problems which I think both have been found to
> be incorrect implications.
JD asked
On 04/22/2011 09:04 PM, Craig White wrote:
<>
>
> the implication being that the specific version mentioned doesn't have
> known security and crash problems which I think both have been found to
> be incorrect implications.
i do not know what 'implications' you are implying, but i believe th
On 04/22/11 14:04, Craig White wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 20:29 +, g wrote:
>> On 04/22/2011 07:31 PM, JD wrote:
>> <>
>>
>>> if the crash of, say flash plugin crashes FF,
>>> then I will re-install it.
>> latest flash is 10.2.159.1.
>>
>> anything prior has security and crash problems.
>>
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 20:29 +, g wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 07:31 PM, JD wrote:
> <>
>
> > if the crash of, say flash plugin crashes FF,
> > then I will re-install it.
>
> latest flash is 10.2.159.1.
>
> anything prior has security and crash problems.
>
>
the implication being that the sp
On 04/22/11 13:29, g wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 07:31 PM, JD wrote:
> <>
>
>> if the crash of, say flash plugin crashes FF,
>> then I will re-install it.
> latest flash is 10.2.159.1.
>
> anything prior has security and crash problems.
>
>
Yup! That's what I have.
Let's hope Adobe keeps it free of secu
On 04/22/2011 07:31 PM, JD wrote:
<>
> if the crash of, say flash plugin crashes FF,
> then I will re-install it.
latest flash is 10.2.159.1.
anything prior has security and crash problems.
--
peace out.
tc.hago,
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft
On 04/22/11 11:17, James Wilkinson wrote:
> JD wrote:
>> I uninstalled it and there was no complaint of any dependency.
>> It must have been a remnant from F13 when performed the
>> upgrade to F14, and the next yum update simply installed
>> updated the F13 version to F14.
> Without nspluginwrapper
On 04/22/2011 06:17 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
<>
> Without nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in the same process as
<>
> With nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in separate processes.
<>
ahhh. yes. you refreshed the brain cells. [should stick this time] this
was discussed in a 'support-fir
JD wrote:
> I uninstalled it and there was no complaint of any dependency.
> It must have been a remnant from F13 when performed the
> upgrade to F14, and the next yum update simply installed
> updated the F13 version to F14.
Without nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in the same process as
Fire
On 04/22/11 09:05, g wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 03:13 PM, JD wrote:
> <>
>
>> As I said, my OS is 32 bit, and all my rpms are 32 bit.
>> I have no 64 bit anything.
> actually, you stated "Is nspluginwrapper needed for i686 platforms?",
> which infers 32 bit. [just kidding with you. no offense intended]
On 04/22/2011 03:13 PM, JD wrote:
<>
> As I said, my OS is 32 bit, and all my rpms are 32 bit.
> I have no 64 bit anything.
actually, you stated "Is nspluginwrapper needed for i686 platforms?",
which infers 32 bit. [just kidding with you. no offense intended]
> I was just wondering why I have ns
On 04/22/11 01:55, g wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 04:16 AM, JD wrote:
>> Is nspluginwrapper needed for i686 platforms?
> have a look at;
>
>http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/linux-amd64.html
>
> for a better understanding of what nspluginwrapper is about.
>
> hth.
>
> later.
Right. The blub says:
nsplugin
On 04/22/2011 04:16 AM, JD wrote:
> Is nspluginwrapper needed for i686 platforms?
have a look at;
http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/linux-amd64.html
for a better understanding of what nspluginwrapper is about.
hth.
later.
--
peace out.
tc.hago,
g
.
in a free world without fences, who n
14 matches
Mail list logo
