Re: nfs problem [solved]

2017-06-02 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/02/2017 04:51 PM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > On 03/06/17 03:13, Rick Stevens wrote: >> On 06/02/2017 05:07 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: >>> On 02/06/17 21:48, Roger Heflin wrote: If the machine mounting the file and doing the tail has read from the file and there is new data added in th

Re: nfs problem [solved]

2017-06-02 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
On 03/06/17 03:13, Rick Stevens wrote: On 06/02/2017 05:07 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: On 02/06/17 21:48, Roger Heflin wrote: If the machine mounting the file and doing the tail has read from the file and there is new data added in that last block and because of the rate the data is coming into

Re: nfs problem

2017-06-02 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/02/2017 05:07 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > On 02/06/17 21:48, Roger Heflin wrote: >> If the machine mounting the file and doing the tail has read from the >> file and there is new data added in that last block and because of the >> rate the data is coming into the file the timestamp on the fi

Re: nfs problem

2017-06-02 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
On 02/06/17 21:48, Roger Heflin wrote: If the machine mounting the file and doing the tail has read from the file and there is new data added in that last block and because of the rate the data is coming into the file the timestamp on the file does not change then the client nfs host will not kno

Re: nfs problem

2017-06-02 Thread Roger Heflin
If the machine mounting the file and doing the tail has read from the file and there is new data added in that last block and because of the rate the data is coming into the file the timestamp on the file does not change then the client nfs host will not know that the last block has changed and wil

Re: nfs problem

2017-06-02 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
On 16/04/17 17:13, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: I asked on AskFedora and got no response. Hoping this list is more active. https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/104010/nfs-showing-bad-data-f24/ I last (17/04) reported the problem on redhat bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug

Re: nfs problem

2017-04-17 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
On 17/04/17 23:00, InvalidPath wrote: On Apr 16, 2017 5:03 PM, "Eyal Lebedinsky" mailto:fed...@eyal.emu.id.au>> wrote: On 17/04/17 01:21, stan wrote: On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 17:13:19 +1000 Eyal Lebedinsky mailto:fed...@eyal.emu.id.au>> wrote: I asked on AskFedora

Re: nfs problem

2017-04-17 Thread InvalidPath
On Apr 16, 2017 5:03 PM, "Eyal Lebedinsky" wrote: On 17/04/17 01:21, stan wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 17:13:19 +1000 > Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > > I asked on AskFedora and got no response. Hoping this list is more >> > > It *is* Easter weekend. > And it is. I asked over a week ago though, on 7

Re: nfs problem

2017-04-16 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
On 17/04/17 01:21, stan wrote: On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 17:13:19 +1000 Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: I asked on AskFedora and got no response. Hoping this list is more It *is* Easter weekend. And it is. I asked over a week ago though, on 7/Apr. [trim] -- Eyal Lebedinsky (fed...@eyal.emu.id.au) _

Re: nfs problem

2017-04-16 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
On 17/04/17 01:31, InvalidPath wrote: On Apr 16, 2017 1:14 AM, "Eyal Lebedinsky" mailto:fed...@eyal.emu.id.au>> wrote: I asked on AskFedora and got no response. Hoping this list is more active. https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/104010/nfs-showing-bad-data-f24/

Re: nfs problem

2017-04-16 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
On 17/04/17 01:31, InvalidPath wrote: On Apr 16, 2017 1:14 AM, "Eyal Lebedinsky" mailto:fed...@eyal.emu.id.au>> wrote: I asked on AskFedora and got no response. Hoping this list is more active. https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/104010/nfs-showing-bad-data-f24/

Re: nfs problem

2017-04-16 Thread InvalidPath
On Apr 16, 2017 1:14 AM, "Eyal Lebedinsky" wrote: I asked on AskFedora and got no response. Hoping this list is more active. https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/104010/nfs-showing -bad-data-f24/ I have a f24 workstation (nfs client). It is updated regularly. The server is f19, so n

Re: nfs problem

2017-04-16 Thread stan
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 17:13:19 +1000 Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > I asked on AskFedora and got no response. Hoping this list is more It *is* Easter weekend. > active. > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/104010/nfs-showing-bad-data-f24/ > > I have a f24 workstation (nfs client). It is updated

Re: NFS problem in FC13

2010-06-19 Thread M A Young
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, gary artim wrote: > I had a problem with this, my server running fc12, client running > fc13. The nfs mount worked, but all the files were read only and the > owner.group for all files were set to nobody. I used the '-o > nfsvers=3' option on the client. -- gary That sounds l

Re: NFS problem in FC13

2010-06-18 Thread gary artim
I had a problem with this, my server running fc12, client running fc13. The nfs mount worked, but all the files were read only and the owner.group for all files were set to nobody. I used the '-o nfsvers=3' option on the client. -- gary On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, M A Young wrote: > On Tue, 1

Re: NFS problem in FC13 FIXED, at least for now

2010-06-16 Thread Gerhard Magnus
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 23:41 +0100, M A Young wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Gerhard Magnus wrote: > > > I am trying to upgrade the boxes on a small LAN from FC11 to FC13. The > > server is now running FC13 and NFS. One of the boxes that is still > > running FC11 can read & write to the shared direc

Re: NFS problem in FC13

2010-06-15 Thread M A Young
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Gerhard Magnus wrote: > I am trying to upgrade the boxes on a small LAN from FC11 to FC13. The > server is now running FC13 and NFS. One of the boxes that is still > running FC11 can read & write to the shared directories on the server > without problems. But I'm having proble

Re: NFS problem in FC13

2010-06-15 Thread Phil Meyer
On 06/15/2010 03:07 PM, Gerhard Magnus wrote: > I am trying to upgrade the boxes on a small LAN from FC11 to FC13. The > server is now running FC13 and NFS. One of the boxes that is still > running FC11 can read& write to the shared directories on the server > without problems. But I'm having prob