Re: Named keeps dying on me

2022-12-16 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 12/15/22 16:26, Sam Varshavchik wrote: ToddAndMargo via users writes: # cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.53 options edns0 trust-ad search . Ummm. This is not bind. This is, most likely, systemd-resolved. The problem happens whenever a network configuration event occurs, such and

Re: Named keeps dying on me

2022-12-15 Thread Sam Varshavchik
ToddAndMargo via users writes: # cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.53 options edns0 trust-ad search . Ummm. This is not bind. This is, most likely, systemd-resolved. pgpjBPesEYtnH.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- u

Re: Named keeps dying on me

2022-12-15 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:21:34 -0800 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Your in frustration, Has resolv.conf changed? Sometimes DHCP comes along on lease renewal and rewrites sutff. Somewhere there is a NetworkManager option to make it leave resolv.conf alone (always takes me an hour to find it though

Re: Named keeps dying on me

2022-12-15 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 12/15/22 14:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All. FC37 bind-chroot-9.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 I have a caching server configured. This is becoming a real pain in the ... Named can not be connected to after about five minutes. As of FC37 (no issue in FC36) # cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserve

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-11-07 Thread Ed Greshko
On 11/8/19 1:09 PM, Tim via users wrote: Tim: For instance, your computer could set your clock for you properly, fully automatically, if it knew where you were. Ed Greshko: That, of course, would require a "public IP" address. Potentially doable with IPv6, if it were fully supported. My ISP

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-11-07 Thread Tim via users
Tim: >> For instance, your computer could set your clock for you properly, >> fully automatically, if it knew where you were. Ed Greshko: > That, of course, would require a "public IP" address. Potentially doable with IPv6, if it were fully supported. My ISP doesn't support it, at all. > And, n

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-11-07 Thread Petr Menšík
> On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 18:46 +, Petr Menšík wrote: > > What is "it"? Kindly follow long-standing convention and quote the part > of a message you are responding to. HyperKitty does NOT do this > automatically. > > poc Oh, right, thanks. Overlooked quote button on HyperKitty. This is I was

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-11-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 18:46 +, Petr Menšík wrote: > It should not be deleted. It is packaged contents of usr/share/GeoIP/, just > bind mounted into /var/named/chroot when named-chroot.service is running. As > soon as it stops, it is unmounted. What is "it"? Kindly follow long-standing conven

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-11-06 Thread Petr Menšík
Hi Todd, It should not be deleted. It is packaged contents of usr/share/GeoIP/, just bind mounted into /var/named/chroot when named-chroot.service is running. As soon as it stops, it is unmounted. mount --bind means it does not use more space. It can be a bit confusing, but those files are sti

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-10-18 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/19/19 10:16 AM, Tim via users wrote: For instance, your computer could set your clock for you properly, fully automatically, if it knew where you were. That, of course, would require a "public IP" address. And, not to mention, even if one has a "public IP" address, what would happen if

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-10-18 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 12:46:01PM +1030, Tim via users wrote: > BIND are a waste of time for the average network. I wish we had an > *easy* to control location service for desktops. It's annoying that > any time I look for products online, I get an interstate hardware shop > that I have to custo

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-10-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 10/18/19 7:16 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 18:22 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I renamed it and rebooted. Named is working normally, so I got away with it. Are you using GeoIP based rules in your named.conf file? No GeoIP can be used to serve different DNS ans

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-10-18 Thread Tim via users
On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 18:22 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > I renamed it and rebooted. Named is working normally, > so I got away with it. Are you using GeoIP based rules in your named.conf file? GeoIP can be used to serve different DNS answers to people based on their location. You can

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-10-18 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:45:31PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > I see nothing about it in named.conf. I wasn't even > aware that they were linked. > > And I certainly see none of the stuff in there: > > Using the GeoIP Features in BIND 9.10 > https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01149 Bind is

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-10-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 10/18/19 6:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:22:28PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: /var/named/chroot/usr/share/GeoIP/GeoLite2-City.mmdb [...] I renamed it and rebooted. Named is working normally, so I got away with it. What are you using bind (named) to do? T

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-10-18 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:22:28PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >>/var/named/chroot/usr/share/GeoIP/GeoLite2-City.mmdb [...] > I renamed it and rebooted. Named is working normally, > so I got away with it. What are you using bind (named) to do? The GeoIP database is used to resolve (to

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-10-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 10/18/19 6:10 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:56:16 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 62899374 Oct 8 12:07 /var/named/chroot/usr/share/GeoIP/GeoLite2-City.mmdb I have no /var/named/chroot version of that file, but I do have: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root

Re: Named GeoIP just got large

2019-10-18 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:56:16 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 62899374 Oct 8 12:07 > /var/named/chroot/usr/share/GeoIP/GeoLite2-City.mmdb I have no /var/named/chroot version of that file, but I do have: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 61356751 Aug 6 15:31 /usr/share/GeoIP/

Re: named-chroot.service hangs in F19

2013-07-04 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Sam Varshavchik writes: systemctl start named-chroot.service hangs for a minute, or so. ps shows that named is running, but systemctl is trying to execute the following: root 2036 2035 0 09:53 pts/000:00:00 /usr/bin/systemd-tty-ask- password-agent --watch Follow-up, I don't th

Re: named-chroot broken in F17

2012-06-09 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Ed Greshko writes: On 06/10/2012 12:32 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Just wasted an entire morning figuring why named was having a bad hair day; with > nary a clue as to what the problem is. > > To save everyone else from wasting time as well, the PrivateTmp directive in > named-chroot.serv

Re: named-chroot broken in F17

2012-06-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/10/2012 12:32 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Just wasted an entire morning figuring why named was having a bad hair day; > with > nary a clue as to what the problem is. > > To save everyone else from wasting time as well, the PrivateTmp directive in > named-chroot.service conveniently unmounts

Re: named

2012-04-04 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 04Apr2012 16:29, Scott van Looy wrote: | Hoping this might help someone debug my issue… | | I attached a strace: | strace -f -p 1747 -o trace.txt | | Left it running for around 10 seconds and got 34Mb of log that's all pretty much this: | | 1751 epoll_wait(9, | 1750 futex(0x7f8148e22028

Re: named

2012-04-04 Thread Scott van Looy
I had a look and followed the suggestions in the bug comments, but it doesn't seem to help at all. Thanks for the help though! Scott On 4 Apr 2012, at 17:41, Kevin Martin wrote: > > > On 04/04/2012 09:29 AM, Scott van Looy wrote: >> Hoping this might help someone debug my issue… >> >> I

Re: named

2012-04-04 Thread Kevin Martin
On 04/04/2012 09:29 AM, Scott van Looy wrote: > Hoping this might help someone debug my issue… > > I attached a strace: > strace -f -p 1747 -o trace.txt > > Left it running for around 10 seconds and got 34Mb of log that's all pretty > much this: > > 1751 epoll_wait(9, > 1750 futex(0x7f8148

Re: named

2012-04-04 Thread Scott van Looy
Hoping this might help someone debug my issue… I attached a strace: strace -f -p 1747 -o trace.txt Left it running for around 10 seconds and got 34Mb of log that's all pretty much this: 1751 epoll_wait(9, 1750 futex(0x7f8148e22028, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1 1749 futex(0x7f8148e22028, FUTEX_WA

Re: named shows different results

2011-06-30 Thread fedora
Hi Tim i think the problem comes from the different views a DNS provides. in my config i should be more specific about which zone belongs to which view. On an internal view (which by default i catch when accessing the DNS on the internal network) it may be of no importance when an external addr

Re: named shows different results

2011-06-29 Thread Tim
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 19:26 +0200, fedora wrote: > I changed some CNAME entries in the named for a specific domain this > morning. How did you make the change, and where? And how is the change supposed to propagate to the other name servers? > > when i now (from an internal workstation) do a >

Re: named shows different results

2011-06-29 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/29/2011 11:04 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 06/29/2011 01:26 PM, fedora wrote: >> from the outside world, the new (correct) value is always returned. >> >> what could the problem be and how to avoid it? > > You are viewing the contents of different caches. Your internal "view" > has a cach

Re: named shows different results

2011-06-29 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On 06/29/2011 01:26 PM, fedora wrote: > from the outside world, the new (correct) value is always returned. > > what could the problem be and how to avoid it? You are viewing the contents of different caches. Your internal "view" has a cache and your "external" view has another one (I assume you