On 11/26/2012 01:11 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:19:11 -0700,
JD wrote:
The Read/Write failures started in 3.6.X kernels, but do not appear
in 3.7.
3.7 is doing the right thing by first issuing a hard reset to the
sleeping
drives before reading or committing the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:19:11 -0700,
JD wrote:
The Read/Write failures started in 3.6.X kernels, but do not appear in 3.7.
3.7 is doing the right thing by first issuing a hard reset to the sleeping
drives before reading or committing the journals. 3.6.X was not sending any
hard resets to
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:19:11 -0700,
JD wrote:
The 50% cpu consumption by kswapd appeared first in 3.7
Thanks for that clarification.
It looks like there may be multiple things causing similar problems here.
3.7-rc7 should have another patch to help this, but there are still some
patch
On 11/26/2012 12:01 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:19:05 -0700,
JD wrote:
This is why I decided to download source of kernel 3.7.0-rc6.git from
fc19 and build it on my fc16, in the hopes of a better kernel. But
no it has the kswap bug eating 50% of cpu.
So was
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:19:05 -0700,
JD wrote:
This is why I decided to download source of kernel 3.7.0-rc6.git from
fc19 and build it on my fc16, in the hopes of a better kernel. But
no it has the kswap bug eating 50% of cpu.
So was this happening with both 3.7 and 3.6 kernels? Th
On 11/26/2012 06:33 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 00:20:02 -0700,
JD wrote:
Is this normal for the kswapd to consume 50% of cpu?
And why would it do that?
This is the first time I have seen this.
Kernel is kernel-3.6.6-1.fc16
24 root 20 0 000 R 50.1
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 00:20:02 -0700,
JD wrote:
Is this normal for the kswapd to consume 50% of cpu?
And why would it do that?
This is the first time I have seen this.
Kernel is kernel-3.6.6-1.fc16
24 root 20 0 000 R 50.1 0.0 117:08.40 kswapd0
There have been problem
