On 6/8/25 2:36 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Subject: Re: gparted
On 6/8/25 1:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Thank for the feedback.
I did not try because Todd gave an easier option.
However, I also have an issue with gnome-terminal
For example,it does not "wrok" betwee
> Subject: Re: gparted
>
> On 6/8/25 1:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > Thank for the feedback.
> > I did not try because Todd gave an easier option.
> > However, I also have an issue with gnome-terminal
> > For example,it does not "wrok" be
On 6/8/25 1:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Thank for the feedback.
I did not try because Todd gave an easier option.
However, I also have an issue with gnome-terminal
For example,it does not "wrok" between 2 fedora machines.
/usr/bin/gnome-terminal
does not open a new terminal (not complai
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 10:45:05 +0200 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> A more proper way to use sudo for that is thus:
> XAUTHORITY=${XAUTHORITY:-~/.Xauthority} sudo su root -c gparted
> Ie: use su to properly forward the xauth keys.
Note that this still assumes that root has access to the user
Hi.
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 09:58:55 +0200 Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
>> I can get gparted to work after I "su" to root on
>> the remote machine. (I see you used "sudo".)
> It works.
Right. This is because su forwards (properly) the xauth keys. It does
that by using pam_xauth (see man pam_xauth
y, June 08, 2025 at 12:21 AM
From: "Will McDonald"
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Cc: "Patrick Dupre"
Subject: Re: gparted
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 at 20:05, Patrick Dupre via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
After ssh -X on a remote mac
Am 08.06.2025 um 09:58:55 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users:
> However, what is the "-t" for ?
> man ssh does not provide this option
Debian's manpage has it:
-t Force pseudo-terminal allocation. This can be used to
execute arbitrary screen-based programs on a remote mach
Thank.
It works.
However, what is the "-t" for ?
man ssh does not provide this option
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2025 at 5:12 AM
> From: "ToddAndMargo via users"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "ToddAndMargo"
> Subject: Re: gparted
>
>
On 6/7/25 12:04 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Hello,
After ssh -X on a remote machine
If I tried to run
sudo gparted
I get
X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
while I can sudo on this machine.
It it specific to gparted ?
Thank.
=
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 at 20:05, Patrick Dupre via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> After ssh -X on a remote machine
> If I tried to run
>
> sudo gparted
> I get
> X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
>
> while I can sudo on this machine.
>
This isn't parted specifi
Am 07.06.2025 um 21:04:31 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users:
> X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
>
> while I can sudo on this machine.
X11 uses a Cookie to authenticate.
> It it specific to gparted ?
Did you use gparted or gparted-root, which exists on some systems an
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016, 4:32 AM antonio montagnani
> Tnx for your comment, as I filed the new ticket that is similar to the
> old one and I didn't detect it.
> Looking forward to a solution in a Wayland and not for a workaround :-)
>
blivet-gui works on Wayland, is in the default repo.
Chris Mu
Michael Schwendt ha scritto il 16/12/2016 alle 12:22:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:03:02 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
When I start Gparted, after the password request window nothing happens.
If started in a terminal I get:
gparted
Created symlink /run/systemd/system/-.mount → /dev/null.
Create
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:03:02 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
> When I start Gparted, after the password request window nothing happens.
> If started in a terminal I get:
>
> gparted
> Created symlink /run/systemd/system/-.mount → /dev/null.
> Created symlink /run/systemd/system/boot-efi.mount
On 11.09.2012, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Or is that too easy, and something I can't think of
> might go horribly wrong (which is why I ask :-)?
The only thing I can think of by now is something like WDs "advanced
format", that the drive uses 512/4096 sectorsize. If the partition is
properly aligned,
15 matches
Mail list logo
