On 3/9/22 20:35, Tim via users wrote:
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 10:36 -0500, Dave Ulrick wrote:
I see that TB 102 has a DNS-over-HTTPS option under General /
Network Connection / Settings but it's disabled.
Perhaps turn that function on, exit, off again, and see if it sets the
new setting. There
On 9/3/22 8:18 AM, Dave Ulrick wrote:
On 9/3/22 5:35 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 10:36 -0500, Dave Ulrick wrote:
I see that TB 102 has a DNS-over-HTTPS option under General /
Network Connection / Settings but it's disabled.
Perhaps turn that function on, exit, off again, and
On 9/3/22 5:35 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 10:36 -0500, Dave Ulrick wrote:
I see that TB 102 has a DNS-over-HTTPS option under General /
Network Connection / Settings but it's disabled.
Perhaps turn that function on, exit, off again, and see if it sets the
new setting. There
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 10:36 -0500, Dave Ulrick wrote:
> I see that TB 102 has a DNS-over-HTTPS option under General /
> Network Connection / Settings but it's disabled.
Perhaps turn that function on, exit, off again, and see if it sets the
new setting. There could be a conflict between old confi
On 8/28/22 3:25 AM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
f36, just updated and received
thunderbird-librnp-rnp-102.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64
from thunderbird-91.12.0-1.fc36.x86_64
tb brings up the expected display but no input is accepted. The
process is shown as running with 100% CPU
PID USER PR NI
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 12:55 +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> I mark the spam folder to only show unread messages. This way I see what was
> added
> before marking all as read (after unJunking any mistakes).
That kind of thing's a pet hate of mine. On usenet (newsgroups), the
clients had an IGNORE
On 02/09/2022 11.11, Tim via users wrote:
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 22:12 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
My understanding was that the interpretation had already been done, and
they remain in the junk folder in case it got it wrong. You can check
what it's junking, you can find a mail it erroneously
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 22:12 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> My understanding was that the interpretation had already been done, and
> they remain in the junk folder in case it got it wrong. You can check
> what it's junking, you can find a mail it erroneously junked, and you
> can reclassify it as b
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 9:43 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 08:57 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> > I'm not sure about emptying the junk folder automatically, my
> > interpretation of the junk process was the mails have to remain in that
> > folder for the junk processing to determ
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 08:57 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I'm not sure about emptying the junk folder automatically, my
> interpretation of the junk process was the mails have to remain in that
> folder for the junk processing to determine a new mail is junk according
> to your rules,
My under
On 30/8/22 10:39, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
On 28/08/2022 18.25, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
f36, just updated and received
thunderbird-librnp-rnp-102.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64
from thunderbird-91.12.0-1.fc36.x86_64
tb brings up the expected display but no input is accepted. The
process is shown as running
On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 10:39 +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> After trying a few solutions (unsuccessfully) I compared an empty profile
> (working, created as a test)
> to the bad one (hanging) and started moving some control files (file in the
> root of the profile) across.
>
> The last thing I d
On 28/08/2022 18.25, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
f36, just updated and received thunderbird-librnp-rnp-102.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64
from thunderbird-91.12.0-1.fc36.x86_64
tb brings up the expected display but no input is accepted. The process is
shown as running with 100% CPU
PID USER PR NI
On 29/08/2022 10.12, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
On 29/08/2022 09.21, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 28/8/22 18:25, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
f36, just updated and received thunderbird-librnp-rnp-102.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64
from thunderbird-91.12.0-1.fc36.x86_64
tb brings up the expected display but no input i
On 29/08/2022 01.03, Tim via users wrote:
On Sun, 2022-08-28 at 18:25 +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
My main mail client is on another machine, still running tb 91, and
not showing this problem.
Okay, after doing some tests I can confirm the same behaviour.
I set up the old thunderbird-libr
On 29/08/2022 00.06, stan via users wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 19:46:11 +1000
Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
POP3, but the problem shows before I can do anything, let alone fetch
mail (not done automatically when tb launches).
I don't use TB, but a quick search on the web suggested the first step
On 29/08/2022 09.21, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 28/8/22 18:25, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
f36, just updated and received thunderbird-librnp-rnp-102.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64
from thunderbird-91.12.0-1.fc36.x86_64
tb brings up the expected display but no input is accepted. The process is
shown as running wi
On 28/8/22 18:25, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
f36, just updated and received
thunderbird-librnp-rnp-102.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64
from thunderbird-91.12.0-1.fc36.x86_64
tb brings up the expected display but no input is accepted. The
process is shown as running with 100% CPU
PID USER PR NI
On 8/28/22 17:03, Tim via users wrote:
Aug 29 00:00:54 rocky dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth
attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=192.168.1.2, lip=192.168.1.1, TLS:
SSL_read() failed: error:14094412:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3
alert bad certificate: SSL alert number 42, session=
On Sun, 2022-08-28 at 18:25 +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> My main mail client is on another machine, still running tb 91, and
> not showing this problem.
Okay, after doing some tests I can confirm the same behaviour.
I set up the old thunderbird-librnp-rnp-91.12.0-1.fc36.x86_64 to access
my lo
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 19:46:11 +1000
Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> POP3, but the problem shows before I can do anything, let alone fetch
> mail (not done automatically when tb launches).
I don't use TB, but a quick search on the web suggested the first step
was to start in safe mode, to see if it was a
On 28/08/2022 19.31, Tim via users wrote:
On Sun, 2022-08-28 at 18:25 +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
There are not too many emails here, maybe a few tens of thousand
totaling just over 1GB (a few mailing lists).
Not all in the inbox, or one folder, I hope?
No, Inbox is very light, most messa
On Sun, 2022-08-28 at 18:25 +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> There are not too many emails here, maybe a few tens of thousand
> totaling just over 1GB (a few mailing lists).
Not all in the inbox, or one folder, I hope?
> My main mail client is on another machine, still running tb 91, and
> not sho
23 matches
Mail list logo
