Yes, all working for me now. Thank you!
--
Chris Kloiber
On 06/29/2010 11:54 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:43:00 -0400
Chris Kloiber wrote:
Why is evolution-data-server still broken after this much time, and
is anything being done to correct it? I'm guessing all the
dependen
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:56, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:43:00 -0400, Chris wrote:
>
> > Why is evolution-data-server still broken after this much time, and is
> > anything being done to correct it? I'm guessing all the dependencies
> > must be rebuilt against the new packa
On 06/29/2010 11:54 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:43:00 -0400
> Chris Kloiber wrote:
>
>
>> Why is evolution-data-server still broken after this much time, and
>> is anything being done to correct it? I'm guessing all the
>> dependencies must be rebuilt against the new package
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:43:00 -0400
Chris Kloiber wrote:
> Why is evolution-data-server still broken after this much time, and
> is anything being done to correct it? I'm guessing all the
> dependencies must be rebuilt against the new package.
Yes. I think all of them have now been rebuilt and pu
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:43:00 -0400, Chris wrote:
> Why is evolution-data-server still broken after this much time, and is
> anything being done to correct it? I'm guessing all the dependencies
> must be rebuilt against the new package.
>
> So far I get the best results adding to the yum.conf:
>
Around 11:43am on Tuesday, June 29, 2010 (UK time), Chris Kloiber scrawled:
> So far I get the best results adding to the yum.conf:
>
> exclude=evolution*
>
> and occasionally un-commenting it to see if it's fixed.
I suggest a more elegant solution is to run "yum --skip-broken". This
will ignor
