On 12/16/2011 10:28 AM, Claude Jones wrote:
On 12/15/2011 05:34 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
A new error now being reported is this: "Can't open
/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases for append." and then results in "Unit
dhcpd.service entered failed state." - I navigated to that file using
Konqueror running
On 12/15/2011 05:34 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
A new error now being reported is this: "Can't open
/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases for append." and then results in "Unit
dhcpd.service entered failed state." - I navigated to that file using
Konqueror running as root, and the file is there and I was able
On 12/15/2011 05:57 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
I see you have fixed that now but have fallen into a different problem:-)
yeah, layered issues - I'm on #3 now...
--
Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription option
On 12/15/2011 04:45 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
> I tried both suggestions, singly, and both together though I didn't
> think the forward slash in lieu of "netmask" was right.
>
> Nothing worked. It's so strange...
>
bah sorry - the "/" wasn't supposed to be literal ... i just meant
change the .1
On 12/15/2011 05:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> my whole dhcpd.conf file
this has nothing to do with your dhcpd.conf
look at your /etc/sysconfig/dhcpd AND you network-config of the machine
has the machine a 192.168.2.x address?
this below is my config for having dhcp only on internal subnet wh
Am 15.12.2011 22:56, schrieb Claude Jones:
> On 12/15/2011 04:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 15.12.2011 22:10, schrieb Claude Jones:
>>> > /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf line 9: subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0:
>>> > bad subnet number/mask combination.
>>> > Can anyone spot what's wrong w
On 12/15/2011 04:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.12.2011 22:10, schrieb Claude Jones:
> /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf line 9: subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0: bad
subnet number/mask combination.
> Can anyone spot what's wrong with that subnet number/mask combo?
192.168.2.1 is not a subnet
On 12/15/2011 04:23 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 12/15/2011 04:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 04:10 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
>> The relevant line from my dhcpd.conf is the top one here:
>>
>> subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
...
>
>Try 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.25
Am 15.12.2011 22:10, schrieb Claude Jones:
> /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf line 9: subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0: bad
> subnet number/mask combination.
> Can anyone spot what's wrong with that subnet number/mask combo?
192.168.2.1 is not a subnet, 192.168.2.0 is
signature.asc
Description:
On 12/15/2011 04:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 04:10 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
>> The relevant line from my dhcpd.conf is the top one here:
>>
>> subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
...
>
> Try 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0
>
typo - your net is 192.168.2.0 / 255.255.255.
On 12/15/2011 04:10 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
> The relevant line from my dhcpd.conf is the top one here:
>
> subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> range 192.168.2.100 192.168.2.199;
> option routers 192.168.2.1;
> default-lease-time 600;
> max-lease-time 7200;
>
> From my messages l
11 matches
Mail list logo