Re: Bind mounting hogs.

On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 23:22 -0400, R. Clayton wrote: > Is this an old system that has been updated across several versions? > > It is; my notes start at 31, and it's been all updates since. > You might want to consider doing a fresh install, using BTRFS rather than LVM. Your disk space admin wi

Re: Bind mounting hogs.

Is this an old system that has been updated across several versions? It is; my notes start at 31, and it's been all updates since. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedorapro

Re: Bind mounting hogs.

> On 28 Aug 2024, at 18:28, R. Clayton wrote: > > 'm guessing the implication is I can shift 100g or so from fedora-home to > fedora-root instead of using bind mounts. Yes that is what I would do. You need to shrink /home and then you grow /. I know you can grow an EXT4 LVM partition on-line,

Re: Bind mounting hogs.

On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 13:28 -0400, R. Clayton wrote: > Apparently I am using LVM, although I didn't set it up.  I specify > ext4 whenever I make file systems; it doesn't look like anything has > helped me by using btrfs in a file system. Is this an old system that has been updated across several v

Re: Bind mounting hogs.

On 8/28/24 10:28 AM, R. Clayton wrote: Depending on the details of your disk partition and file system setup you may be able to grow / Are you using LVM? I assuming you do not use btrfs. Apparently I am using LVM, although I didn't set it up. I specify ext4 whenever I make file systems; i

Re: Bind mounting hogs.

Depending on the details of your disk partition and file system setup you may be able to grow / Are you using LVM? I assuming you do not use btrfs. Apparently I am using LVM, although I didn't set it up. I specify ext4 whenever I make file systems; it doesn't look like anything has helped me

Re: Bind mounting hogs.

> On 27 Aug 2024, at 16:40, R. Clayton wrote: > > I'm having space pressure under / Depending on the details of your disk partition and file system setup you may be able to grow / Are you using LVM? I assuming you do not use btrfs. What is the output of this? lsblk -f Barry -- __

Re: Bind mounting hogs.

On 8/27/24 8:40 AM, R. Clayton wrote: I'm having space pressure under /: Fedora 40 won't install because it runs out of space. I'm thinking I can solve this by moving some hogs from / into /home and bind mounting them back into / like so: /home/storage/cache /var/cache none bind /

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 6/29/21 8:10 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: 0) backup your zone tables (3+), named.confg. named.root.key files 0) backup your zone tables (3+), named.config, named.root.key, named.local files ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproje

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 6/29/21 7:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/29/21 5:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 10:26, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 7:13 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 10:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:44, Ed Gr

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 30/06/2021 10:00, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/29/21 5:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 10:26, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 7:13 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 10:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:44, Ed G

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 6/29/21 5:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 10:26, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 7:13 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 10:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:44, Ed Greshko wrote: and [root@f33k ~]# ls -i /var/nam

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 28/06/2021 10:26, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 7:13 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 10:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:44, Ed Greshko wrote: and [root@f33k ~]# ls -i /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/ /var/named/

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 28/06/2021 10:26, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 7:13 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 10:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:44, Ed Greshko wrote: and [root@f33k ~]# ls -i /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/ /var/named/

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 6/27/21 7:13 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 10:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:44, Ed Greshko wrote: and [root@f33k ~]# ls -i /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/ /var/named/slaves/ /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/: 24154

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 28/06/2021 10:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:44, Ed Greshko wrote: and [root@f33k ~]# ls -i /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/ /var/named/slaves/ /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/: 2415417 greshko.com.zone /var/named/slaves/:

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 6/27/21 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:44, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:39, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 5:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 06:40, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/26/21 7:27 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/25/21 12:24 AM, Tim

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 28/06/2021 09:44, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 09:39, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 5:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 06:40, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/26/21 7:27 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/25/21 12:24 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2021-06-24 at

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 28/06/2021 09:39, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/27/21 5:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 06:40, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/26/21 7:27 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/25/21 12:24 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 21:04 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wro

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 6/27/21 5:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 28/06/2021 06:40, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/26/21 7:27 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/25/21 12:24 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 21:04 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I am trying to clean up my bind-chroot forward

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 28/06/2021 06:40, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/26/21 7:27 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/25/21 12:24 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 21:04 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I am trying to clean up my bind-chroot forward and reverse files. The goal is to have

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 6/26/21 7:27 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/25/21 12:24 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 21:04 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I am trying to clean up my bind-chroot forward and reverse files. The goal is to have bind-chroot do its thing by duplicating these two f

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On 6/25/21 12:24 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 21:04 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I am trying to clean up my bind-chroot forward and reverse files. The goal is to have bind-chroot do its thing by duplicating these two files over into /var/named/chroot/var/named/sl

Re: bind-chroot not duplicating my forward and reverse tables

On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 21:04 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > I am trying to clean up my bind-chroot forward and reverse files. > > The goal is to have bind-chroot do its thing by duplicating > these two files over into > /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/ > with the identical inodes li

Re: BIND 9.16

Hi Jerry, I am actually bind maintainer. I would recommend using fedpkg command instead. It does more or less the same as mock here, but is a bit simpler to use. Just use: fedpkg clone bind cd bind git checkout f32 fedpkg mock-build Adding to mock group is still required however. It would buil

Re: BIND 9.16

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 4/28/20 1:06 PM, David wrote: >> What factors will play out by the person choosing to >> replace the current version of "bind" in the Rawhide >> repo" with a later version ? > > For rawhide, mostly just does it work and does it break > anything else. [...] >> And finally, w

Re: BIND / Thank you

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 8:28 PM David wrote: > I have zero idea what are things like bodhi, koji, mock, rpmbuild, etc. In the Red Hat / Fedora world, packages come in the form of files with an ".rpm" suffix. RPM stands for RedHat Package Manager. The tool that is used to create those rpm files

Re: BIND / Thank you

Mr. Sieb, and Mr. James, Thank you very much. I will save these two emails and study them word for word. I have zero idea what are things like bodhi, koji, mock, rpmbuild, etc. But I plan to at least to try to grasp the general basic newbie stuff. David Locklear ___

Re: BIND 9.16

Samuel's answers were excellent. I just want to add one thing. On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:11 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > That is a huge topic. I don't know where to start with that. I use > "rpmbuild" for my purposes, but I've seen it mentioned that "mock" is > the recommended way to build. Actual

Re: BIND 9.16

On 4/28/20 1:06 PM, David wrote: I have nunerous Linux newbie questions, just using "bind" as a package example. The new 9.16 test-version of "bind" is considered "upstream.".  Right ? No, "upstream" is the project supplying the source code. "dnf info bind" gives https://www.isc.org/downloads

Re: BIND 9.16

I have nunerous Linux newbie questions, just using "bind" as a package example. The new 9.16 test-version of "bind" is considered "upstream.". Right ? Is 9.17 "further upstream" ? What factors will play out by the person choosing to replace the current version of "bind" in the Rawhide repo" wit

[389-users] Re: BIND (DNS)

A that explains it! It's possible to do by ldapadd, but it requires a file formatted differently. Glad you got it running in the end. Always happy to help! > On 5 Sep 2019, at 00:04, Fernando Fuentes wrote: > > William, > > Thanks, I got it to import. I was trying to do an ldif import vi

Re: bind-chroot?

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/12/14 08:43, Tom Horsley wrote: >> I am trying to adapt all the config from an ancient (fedora 13) >> system where the disk died to the new disk I figured I might as >> well go ahead and update to centos 7. >> >> Is there anything magical

Re: bind-chroot?

On 08/12/14 08:43, Tom Horsley wrote: > I am trying to adapt all the config from an ancient (fedora 13) > system where the disk died to the new disk I figured I might as > well go ahead and update to centos 7. > > Is there anything magical I need to do to get bind and > bind-chroot working? I've n

Re: bind-license package

On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:04:50 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > What is the purpose of mentioned package? Couldn't it be just a part of > some bind related package? > > $ rpm --query --filesbypkg bind-license > bind-license /usr/share/doc/bind-license-9.9.1 > bind-license

Re: bind 9.7.2-4.P3 in f14 not working with previous reverse lookup zone file

On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:04 -0700, dave perry wrote: > The zone file contents being rejected follow: > > $TTL86400 > @ IN SOA ns1.colo-perrys.com. > hostmaster.colo-perrys.com. ( > 2010121301 ; Serial >

Re: bind 9.7.2-4.P3 in f14 not working with previous reverse, lookup zone file

On 12/14/2010 Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 12/14/2010 12:04 AM, dave perry wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I decided to update a home dns server to fc14 (was running fc9). I >> > can't get bind to accept a zone file that worked with fc12 bind. >> > named-checkconf returns OK so my old named.conf

Re: bind 9.7.2-4.P3 in f14 not working with previous reverse lookup zone file

On 12/14/2010 12:04 AM, dave perry wrote: > Hi, > > I decided to update a home dns server to fc14 (was running fc9). I > can't get bind to accept a zone file that worked with fc12 bind. > named-checkconf returns OK so my old named.conf seem not the problem. > The zone file contents being rej

Re: bind

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:17 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: >> >>  Does the version in koji (bind-9.7.2-1.P3) resolve : >> >>   CVE-2010-3613 >>   CVE-2010-3614 >>   CVE-2010-3615 >> >>  Which *seem* to only impact versions up to P2 - am I correct

Re: bind

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > >  Does the version in koji (bind-9.7.2-1.P3) resolve : > >   CVE-2010-3613 >   CVE-2010-3614 >   CVE-2010-3615 > >  Which *seem* to only impact versions up to P2 - am I correct in > thinking this version indeed resolves the above 3 issues ?

Re: bind() to /dev/log failed

On 07/23/2010 05:14 AM, Mansuri, Wasim (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote: > > > I am working on some network server which has to monitor the os > events and report it to some GUI. For that I want to read the > /dev/log and process it and report it to the GUI. > > So here my aim is not to write but I wa

Re: bind() to /dev/log failed

agram socket whithout consuming data from the socket? I want to keep the data for other applications to read. -Original Message- From: Rick Stevens [mailto:ri...@nerd.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:52 PM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: bind() to /dev/log failed

Re: bind() to /dev/log failed

On 07/21/2010 11:29 PM, Mansuri, Wasim (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote: > > > Hello All, > > I want to listen to /dev/log. For that I am using the following code. > > Please let me know whats the issue in the following code snip. Code I am > running with root user. > > Thanks, wasim > > if ((sockfd = s

Re: bind() to /dev/log failed

On 07/22/2010 02:29 AM, Mansuri, Wasim (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote: > > Hello All, > > I want to listen to /dev/log. For that I am using the following code. > > Please let me know whats the issue in the following code snip. Code I am > running with root user. > > Thanks, wasim > > if ((sockfd =

Re: Bind downloads

On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:53 PM, JD wrote: >  On 07/18/2010 08:36 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Marcel Rieux > > wrote: >> >>     Result: >> >>     >> https://mail.google.com/mail/channel/bind?VER=(...)&it=(...)&SID=(...)&RID=(...)&

Re: Bind downloads

On 07/18/2010 08:36 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Marcel Rieux > wrote: > > Result: > > > https://mail.google.com/mail/channel/bind?VER=(...)&it=(...)&SID=(...)&RID=(...)&AID=(.. > >

Re: Bind downloads

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > Result: > > > https://mail.google.com/mail/channel/bind?VER=(...)&it=(...)&SID=(...)&RID=(...)&AID=(.. > .) > > Page displayed: > Unk

Re: Bind downloads

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Kevin J. Cummings < cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > On 07/16/2010 12:12 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Kevin J. Cummings > > mailto:cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net>> > wrote: > > > > On 07/15/2010 07:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >

Re: Bind downloads

On 07/16/2010 12:12 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Kevin J. Cummings > mailto:cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net>> wrote: > > On 07/15/2010 07:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > This looks like you were at some site that had a 0 length file called > > 'bind' and when

Re: Bind downloads

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Kevin J. Cummings < cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > On 07/15/2010 07:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > This looks like you were at some site that had a 0 length file called > > 'bind' and when you clicked on it it downloaded... it uses the numbers > > each time

Re: Bind downloads

On 07/15/2010 07:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > This looks like you were at some site that had a 0 length file called > 'bind' and when you clicked on it it downloaded... it uses the numbers > each time you download it as a unique identifier, so you must have > clicked on that thing 7 times. I disa

Re: Bind downloads

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:00:49 -0400 Marcel Rieux wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:44:02 -0400 > > Marcel Rieux wrote: > > > > > Once in a while, a pop-up shines saying "Download complete" when I > > > downloaded nothing. > > > > From what

Re: Bind downloads

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:44:02 -0400 > Marcel Rieux wrote: > > > Once in a while, a pop-up shines saying "Download complete" when I > > downloaded nothing. > > From what application? Can you tell by it's window? Web browser perhaps? > Firefox.

Re: Bind downloads

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:44:02 -0400 Marcel Rieux wrote: > Once in a while, a pop-up shines saying "Download complete" when I > downloaded nothing. From what application? Can you tell by it's window? Web browser perhaps? > So, I checked the Downloads directory where, > since 04:12 till 04:57 tod

Re: Bind downloads

Around 10:44pm on Thursday, July 15, 2010 (UK time), Marcel Rieux scrawled: > Anybody knows what's this, why the system automatically downloads 0 byte > bind files? What are bind files? Do you mean the suffix is .bind? Steve -- Play Champions - my free football predictions game at: