On Wed Apr16'25 12:59:45AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:59:45 +0100
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: updating the GRUB bootloader on EFI syste
> > Is the command called something else?
>
> FYI: There a a number of ways to answer this question yourself.
>
> 1. ls /usr/bin/*fwupd*
> 2. rpm -ql fwupd
>
> I use the rpm -ql frequently when I'm not sure what an RPM installed and
> where it put it.
>
Thanks very much for this information!
Ranjan Maitra:
>> It is my understanding that my GRUB2 is installed on UEFI systems.
Marco Moock:
> In most cases it is, as it also provides an EFI bootloader that can
> boot Linux. Even if there are ways to boot the Linux kernel directly
> from the UEFI, most operating systems ship a boot loader
> On 16 Apr 2025, at 00:54, Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
>
> $ sudo fwupd
> sudo: fwupd: command not found
>
> However, fwupd is installed. Why can it not be found?
>
> $ sudo dnf install fwupd
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositories loaded.
> Package "fwupd-1.9.29-1.fc41.x86
On Wed Apr16'25 12:38:41AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:38:41 +0100
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: updating the GRUB bootloader on EFI syste
nity support for Fedora users
> > Subject: Re: updating the GRUB bootloader on EFI systems while upgrading
> >
> > On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 18:00 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > > Thanks! But I get fwupd: command not found.
> > >
> > > Is that not
On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 18:00 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> Thanks! But I get fwupd: command not found.
>
> Is that not different from an update not found?
>
$ rpm -qi fwupd
Name: fwupd
Version : 1.9.29
Release : 1.fc41
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: Thu 20 Mar 2025 09
On Wed Apr16'25 12:20:56AM, greg wrote:
> From: greg
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:20:56 +0200
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: updating the GRUB bootloader on EFI systems while upgrading
>
> >
> Why do I get fwupd not found?
The commands to use - as root - are:
# fwupdmgr get-updates
If updates are available for any devices on the system, they'll be displayed.
# fwupdmgr update
This will download and apply all updates for your system.
(Taken from
/usr/share/doc/fwupd/README.md)
Also t
Thanks for your response!
On Tue Apr15'25 09:07:27PM, Marco Moock wrote:
> From: Marco Moock
> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:07:27 +0200
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: updating the GRUB bootloader on EFI sys
> On 15 Apr 2025, at 19:59, Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
>
> However, the installed or embedded bootloaders are never updated
> automatically.
If you mean the fedora efi code; it is updated in /boot/efi when there is a
change.
I have personally verified this works recently.
Barry
--
Am 15.04.2025 um 13:25:14 Uhr schrieb Ranjan Maitra via users:
> According to
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline/
> systems with the BIOS firmware have the GRUB RPM packages updated.
> However, the installed or embedded bootloaders are never updated
> automa
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:45 AM murph nj wrote:
>
> I got it running. The write-up will not be super complete, but here goes.
>
> When I checked for kernels, I saw that there was a new one available
> (6.9.9?) That installed OK, and seemed to resolve the uname-r issue.
>
> Another package (ko-s
I got it running. The write-up will not be super complete, but here goes.
When I checked for kernels, I saw that there was a new one available
(6.9.9?) That installed OK, and seemed to resolve the uname-r issue.
Another package (ko-something) that was part of the plamsa desktop was
causing a pr
Reinstalling all of those did not seem to resolve it.
As kernel-uname-r is part of kernel-core, I tried reinstalling
kernel-core 6.8.8, which is installed, but not currently running.
I got "Installed package kernel-core-6.8.8-300.fc40.x86_64 (From
@System) not available."
I already removed the 6.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:20 PM murph nj wrote:
>
> Progress:
>
> I've added mirrors.fedoraproject.org and mirror.math.princeton.edu to
> my /etc/hosts, and can do some dnf work:
>
> When I do a dnf distro-sync I get an error:
>
> package kernel-modules-extra-6.8.9-300.fc.x86_64 from @System requ
Note: the error was *not* the same when booting from the 6.8.9 kernel,
replace all of the 6.8.9 from the previous message with 6.8.10.
So, when in 6.8.10, it complains about the 6.8.9, when on 6.8.9, it
complains about .10
I'm a bit confused.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:19 PM murph nj wrote:
>
>
Progress:
I've added mirrors.fedoraproject.org and mirror.math.princeton.edu to
my /etc/hosts, and can do some dnf work:
When I do a dnf distro-sync I get an error:
package kernel-modules-extra-6.8.9-300.fc.x86_64 from @System requires
kernel-uname-r - 6.8.9-300.fc40.x86.x86.64 but none of the p
When I try to start nmcli, I get the following error: "Error: Could
not create NMClient object: Could not Connect: Connection refused"
In journalctl -xe:
nothing but some pam_systemd failed to connect to system bus:
Connection refused
Didn't see anything related to networking
journalctl -u networ
On 7/16/24 3:27 PM, murph nj wrote:
I had not used my Fedora partition on my old laptop for a few weeks.
Came back to a lot of updates that needed running. In the midst of
updating, an overlooked intemittent (thermal) hardware problem cropped
up, locking the machine. I had to hard boot it.
No
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:47:58 -0400
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> (I have open questions about systems that claim both BIOS and UEFI,
> but I have not been able to find answers. If I need to back up a bit,
> then please say so).
This may or may not be helpful, but when I make a "universal" boot
USB stic
On 4/26/23 22:47, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I just dnf-upgraded my last system from F37 to F38. One of the
post-upgrade task is "Update GRUB bootloader on BIOS systems"
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/):
Systems with the BIOS firmware have the GRUB RPM packag
On 02/01/2022 14:43, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/01/2022 20:15, John Pilkington wrote:
My reply was intended to give some evidence about what the rpmfusion
packages provided, and to hint, in response to the preceding post,
that it might give a complete version of the cuda set. I posted a
list of
On 02/01/2022 20:15, John Pilkington wrote:
My reply was intended to give some evidence about what the rpmfusion packages
provided, and to hint, in response to the preceding post, that it might give a
complete version of the cuda set. I posted a list of installed nvidia
packages earlier, but
On 02/01/2022 11:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/01/2022 19:07, John Pilkington wrote:
On 02/01/2022 09:39, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi
On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 13:26:47 -0700 Jerry James wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 1:07 PM wrote:
Can you confirm that you need CUDA and not only the nvid
On 02/01/2022 19:07, John Pilkington wrote:
On 02/01/2022 09:39, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi
On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 13:26:47 -0700 Jerry James wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 1:07 PM wrote:
Can you confirm that you need CUDA and not only the nvidia drivers ?
If yes, I suggest to not
On 02/01/2022 09:39, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi
On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 13:26:47 -0700 Jerry James wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 1:07 PM wrote:
Can you confirm that you need CUDA and not only the nvidia drivers ?
If yes, I suggest to not use the rpmfusion repositories since they do
Hi
On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 13:26:47 -0700 Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 1:07 PM wrote:
>> Can you confirm that you need CUDA and not only the nvidia drivers ?
>> If yes, I suggest to not use the rpmfusion repositories since they don't
>> provide CUDA. See below.
> They don't? Then
John Pilkington wrote:
> There have been several posts in the last few days arising from the shift of
> some nvidia cards to 'legacy' status. Cards supported by the
> 470 series driver but not by 495 now have to add the 470xx tag to the
> rpmfusion package name.
>
> The GTX2060 is listed as supp
Fulko Hew wrote on 2022/01/02 2:52:
I'm not sure where the problem lies, so I'll start out with where I'm
coming from...
I built a machine 2 years ago to support the Folding@Home project
using F32 and an Nvidia 2060 card.
If I can't get to a GUI screen to be able to fetch and install newer N
On Jan 1, 2022, at 16:59, John Pilkington wrote:
> There have been several posts in the last few days arising from the shift of
> some nvidia cards to 'legacy' status. Cards supported by the 470 series
> driver but not by 495 now have to add the 470xx tag to the rpmfusion package
> name.
That
On 01/01/2022 17:52, Fulko Hew wrote:
I'm not sure where the problem lies, so I'll start out with where I'm
coming from...
I built a machine 2 years ago to support the Folding@Home project
using F32 and an Nvidia 2060 card.
It's been running non-stop ever since.
But I want to update the system
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 1:07 PM wrote:
> Can you confirm that you need CUDA and not only the nvidia drivers ?
>
> If yes, I suggest to not use the rpmfusion repositories since they don't
> provide CUDA. See below.
They don't? Then what are the xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda and
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda
Hi.
On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 12:52:46 -0500 Fulko Hew wrote:
> But I want to update the system to the latest and greatest release and
> drivers
> (since it appears that my old? CUDA drivers have stopped working with F@H)
Can you confirm that you need CUDA and not only the nvidia drivers ?
If yes, I
Hello,
I have completed my upgrade. I used the fedora-upgrade package and
command to go the slow way, Fc17 > Fc18 > FC19 > FC20.
It is working.
Much thanks.
Dave.
On 2/17/14, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/17/2014 07:51 AM, Martin Airs wrote:
>> the only thing I would add, is that you probably shoul
On 02/17/2014 07:51 AM, Martin Airs wrote:
the only thing I would add, is that you probably shouldn't use fedup, because
if I remember correctly, fedup puts an entry in the grub.conf to complete the
installation after reboot, and being a remote server, you probably dont have
access to choose this
On Monday 17 Feb 2014 10:26:35 David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you. I will be doing:
>
> F17 > F18 > F20
>
> What issues did you run into when performing your yum update? This
> will be to a remote server and over ssh.
>
> Thanks.
> Dave.
>
the only thing I would add, is that you proba
Hello,
Thank you. I will be doing:
F17 > F18 > F20
What issues did you run into when performing your yum update? This
will be to a remote server and over ssh.
Thanks.
Dave.
On 2/17/14, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:25:59 -0500
> David Mehler wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've got
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:25:59 -0500
David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a Linode running fc17. I'd like to update it to fc20. I'm
> wondering if it's possible to do this upgrade from fc17 to fc20
> without doing a complete reinstall?
Yes and NO,
You cannot go F17 > F20 in one step. (# 2 r
On 12/18/2013 11:00 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:44:20 -0500, Jim wrote:
ERRORS in UPdating on Fedora 18 . I have quite a number of updates but I
keep getting these errors and preventing updates.
What do these ERRORS mean ?
You've added an incompatible package repository
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:44:20 -0500, Jim wrote:
> ERRORS in UPdating on Fedora 18 . I have quite a number of updates but I
> keep getting these errors and preventing updates.
>
> What do these ERRORS mean ?
You've added an incompatible package repository called "linuxtech-release",
which offers
| From: Bruno Wolff III
| On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:16:29 -0400,
| "D. Hugh Redelmeier" wrote:
| >If I install from this stick, will the installed system be already
| >updated?
| The way things currently work the anwser is yes. The file system is
| essentially copied off the live image for
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:16:29 -0400,
"D. Hugh Redelmeier" wrote:
I have built a USB stick with a Live Fedora 19 on it.
I gave it a large overlay to make room for updates.
I booted the stick and did a yum update. (Boy was that slow. I think
that the Kingston DT101 G2 stick, combined with
On 1/20/2013 7:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.01.2013 00:51, schrieb Edward Diener:
I have Fedora 17 installed, using grub2, and have grub2 installed in the /boot
partition and not in the MBR. I have
a multi-boot manager ( Acronis OSS ) in the MBR. Everything is working fine.
As I underst
On 1/20/2013 6:51 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
I have Fedora 17 installed, using grub2, and have grub2 installed in the
/boot partition and not in the MBR. I have a multi-boot manager (
Acronis OSS ) in the MBR. Everything is working fine.
As I understand it I must use FedUp in fedora 17 to upgrade
You can also upgrade using yum... which right now appears the only tested way
to do it.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list
Am 21.01.2013 00:51, schrieb Edward Diener:
> I have Fedora 17 installed, using grub2, and have grub2 installed in the
> /boot partition and not in the MBR. I have
> a multi-boot manager ( Acronis OSS ) in the MBR. Everything is working fine.
>
> As I understand it I must use FedUp in fedora 17
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:56 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> I recommend that you manually change the user and group IDs (UID & GID) prior
> to upgrading the system.
>
> On the old system:
>
> usermod -g 1000 username
> usermod -u 1000 username
>
> Then run:
>
> chown -R username:username directo
I recommend that you manually change the user and group IDs (UID & GID) prior
to upgrading the system.
On the old system:
usermod -g 1000 username
usermod -u 1000 username
Then run:
chown -R username:username directory
chgrp -R username:username directory
for all of your directories.
Reboot
Speaking of system users > 1000 now, does system-config-users
still think 500 is the magic number? I could swear I remember
seeing a bunch of strange users various services installed
to provide themselves a unique user when I run s-c-u on
f16, but didn't stop to think about it at the time. Usually
well i did know dracut but i wasn't aware it was used to update pxe image.
I will give a careful eye on it
Thanks for your answer
Eric Doutreleau
Le 01/07/2011 00:19, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 07/01/2011 05:30 AM, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
>> i m trying to install f13 on a computer with cobbler and
On 07/01/2011 05:30 AM, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> i m trying to install f13 on a computer with cobbler and pxe but when i
> boot the network card is not detected.
> i would like to update the initrd image file with updated modules
>
> Does anybody have a pointer on how to do that?
>
> Thanks in adva
On 06/13/2011 09:10 AM, Alex wrote:
> Yes, I hadn't realized they were available in a repo. Can you point me
> to info on how to use this repo?
>
If you go to http://get.adobe.com/air/ and select YUM as the version to
download it will download an rpm containing the adobe repo information.
After
Hi,
>> Any idea what the issue could be here? Why does it require these
>> applications? I don't ever recall having any difficulty updating this
>> application in the past.
>>
>> gnome-keyring is already installed according to rpm, but is there
>> something I need to do to enable it or something?
> I use the Adobe Air binaries to support Pandora on my fedora14 box.
> Adobe Air is displaying a message that updates are available, but
> every time I try to update it, it prompts me for the root password,
> then prints a message that says "Adobe AIR could not be installed.
> Install either Gnom
--- On Tue, 5/24/11, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> From: Timothy Murphy
> Subject: Re: Updating to F15
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 5:02 AM
> Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> >> From: fred smith
>
> >> I've recently in
On 05/24/2011 05:32 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Sorry to be dim, but is your answer Yes?
> In other words, if I install F-15-rc3 will "yum upgrade"
> bring me to a kosher version of F-15 when this comes out?
Yes. Fedora 15 RC3 = Fedora 15 final
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapr
Antonio Olivares wrote:
>> From: fred smith
>> I've recently installed the latest pre-release on a system
>> here and
>> am wondering if, once the "real" release occurs, would "yum
>> update"
>> bring it up to the release level, or not?
> You are right on track :) You are running Fedora 15 :)
On 05/24/2011 08:14 AM, fred smith wrote:
> I'm SLIGHTLY premature, I know, I beg your indulgence...
>
> I've recently installed the latest pre-release on a system here and
> am wondering if, once the "real" release occurs, would "yum update"
> bring it up to the release level, or not? If not is th
--- On Mon, 5/23/11, fred smith wrote:
> From: fred smith
> Subject: Updating to F15
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Monday, May 23, 2011, 7:44 PM
>
> I'm SLIGHTLY premature, I know, I beg your indulgence...
>
> I've recently installed the latest pre-release on a system
> here an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2011 01:13 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 13:27 -0700, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> Various SSL keys are aging out so we will be updating them before anyone
>> gets a page.
>>
>> The first server to be updated will be fedorahosted.org.
>
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 13:27 -0700, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Various SSL keys are aging out so we will be updating them before anyone
> gets a page.
>
> The first server to be updated will be fedorahosted.org.
>
> The old certificate came from Equifax, was a 1024 bit key and had the
> fingerprint
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:48:22 -0700,
joojee wrote:
> I'd like to automate the process of keeping an iso image current with
> updates that are released. I googled a bit and didn't see anything, but
> does anyone know if there's anything that exists that rsyncs (or whatever)
> the updated pack
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Really, just check the java applet.
Sure.
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: htt
On 09/08/10 11:11, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>
>> That is why there are left various prior Sun Jre's,
>> that you can safely remove after a fresh update.
>> Have done it many times, the old stuff it still there.
>
>
> Oh, really.
Really, just c
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> That is why there are left various prior Sun Jre's,
> that you can safely remove after a fresh update.
> Have done it many times, the old stuff it still there.
Oh, really.
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:56 AM, James McKenzie
wrote:
> Not really. Sun's JRE will install over the top of an existing JRE
> install. However, if it breaks, you get to keep the results. I also
> have a lot of fun installing the JDK on Sun systems and RHEL/RHAS
> systems. Windows is another an
On 09/08/10 00:26, James McKenzie wrote:
>>
>> You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
>> reinstall.
>> Even on Windows
>>
>>
> Not really. Sun's JRE will install over the top of an existing JRE
> install. However, if it breaks, you get to keep the results. I also
>
Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 02/08/10 13:22, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>
>>
>> friend of fedora, i was asking for update only and not reinstalling!!
>>
>
> You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
> reinstall.
>
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Reporting bugs is just fine but not in the language used by the
> reporter. If you are using for a bug to be fixed in a free software
> project, being polite would get you further along than ranting.
This is very correct.
--
Regards,
P
On 08/04/2010 12:45 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Andrew Haley
>> LOL! Not very often, no.
>> Thanks for the sympathy. :-)
>
> Reporting bugs is good because many people see and the one who thinks
> for it, could resolve also or the community in aggregation.
Repo
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> LOL! Not very often, no.
> Thanks for the sympathy. :-)
Reporting bugs is good because many people see and the one who thinks
for it, could resolve also or the community in aggregation.
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Christofer C. Bell
wrote:
> Wow, the guy who reported that bug is a huge jerk. Do you all have to
> put up with that kind of name calling and general unpleasantness
> often?
Why do you say like that?
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lis
On 08/03/2010 05:33 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>> * Parshwa Murdia [2010-08-03 05:29]:
>>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>>
Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
JDK? Does
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Parshwa Murdia [2010-08-03 05:29]:
>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>
>> > Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
>> > JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> H. We may have to fix it eventually.
Yes, humans can do that also.
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On 08/03/2010 03:31 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Parshwa Murdia [2010-08-03 05:29]:
>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>
>>> Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
>>> JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do?
>>
>>
>>
* Parshwa Murdia [2010-08-03 05:29]:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> > Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
> > JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do?
>
>
> Not a problem. I tries to play chess at,
>
> ht
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
> JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do?
Not a problem. I tries to play chess at,
http://www.pogo.com/action/pogo/signin.do?returnType=game&
* Parshwa Murdia [2010-08-02 08:10]:
> I have installed JRE (Sun Java) according to the website:
>
> http://sites.google.com/site/indiadoor/java-jre
>
> But the matter is that the installed version is JRE 1.6.0 Update 20
> and have disabled Open JDK, but how to update this JRE (Sun Java) in
> th
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> :)
:):)
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailin
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Mauriat Miranda wrote:
> Sorry, because you used those instructions there is NO easy way to update.
> You need to redo *every* step.
Oh I see.
> You can undo all those steps and install the RPM.
> There are guides on the web on how to install the Sun JRE RPM an
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> You get to keep the pieces.
No, two parts are not pieces, more that that is pieces!
:)
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproje
On 02/08/10 16:25, Mauriat Miranda wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Mauriat Miranda wrote:
>>
>>> If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
>>> proper symlinks, then the update is just one single 'rpm' co
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Mauriat Miranda wrote:
>
>> If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
>> proper symlinks, then the update is just one single 'rpm' command.
>
>
> I installed using the following:
>
On 02/08/10 16:09, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
>> reinstall.
>> Even on Windows
>
>
> Really?
You get to keep the pieces.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fe
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Mauriat Miranda wrote:
> If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
> proper symlinks, then the update is just one single 'rpm' command.
Oh, I installed using 'yum'!
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorap
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Mauriat Miranda wrote:
> If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
> proper symlinks, then the update is just one single 'rpm' command.
I installed using the following:
http://sites.google.com/site/indiadoor/java-jre
Now what do you t
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
> reinstall.
> Even on Windows
Really?
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
> reinstall.
> Even on Windows
If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
proper symlinks, then the update is just one single 'rpm' command.
--
Ma
On 02/08/10 13:22, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>
> friend of fedora, i was asking for update only and not reinstalling!!
You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
reinstall.
Even on Windows
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UT
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
friend of fedora, i was asking for update only and not reinstalling!!
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
On 02/08/10 13:09, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> I have installed JRE (Sun Java) according to the website:
>
> http://sites.google.com/site/indiadoor/java-jre
>
> But the matter is that the installed version is JRE 1.6.0 Update 20
> and have disabled Open JDK, but how to update this JRE (Sun Java) in
> t
terry writes:
do I need pinyin engine and open phrasedb for chinese since I use
English. and how do i keep the updater from offering it.
Remove the older versions of these packages which you already have
installed.
You are prompted to update to newer versions of any packages you have
insta
prakhar gaur wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> This is my first mail to a mailing list , so if i make any mistakes, Sorry.
> I am trying to update my F9 to F12.
> i have to go from F9 to F10, then F10 to F12.
> i tried
>
> $rpm -Uvh
> ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/Fedora/i3
> I am trying to update my F9 to F12.
> i have to go from F9 to F10, then F10 to F12.
>>I was only able to use "preupgrade" to go from F9 to F11. For whatever
>>reason, F9 to F12 did not work for me. Some time in the near future, I
>>will probably try F11 to F14
when I do,
$ sudo yum ins
--- On Mon, 3/29/10, prakhar gaur wrote:
This is my first mail to a mailing list , so if i make any mistakes, Sorry.
I am trying to update my F9 to F12.
i have to go from F9 to F10, then F10 to F12.
i tried
[snip]
Don't waste your time trying to upgrade. Upgrading has always been
problemat
Hi,
According to the wiki, it's simply not possible to upgrade to F12 from F10
or lower directly, see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq#Fedora_11_-.3E_Fedora_12
It says:
It is not possible to update directly from Fedora 10 or earlier with yum.
To upgrade from Fedora 10, first update t
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 08:36 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> I was only able to use "preupgrade" to go from F9 to F11. For
> whatever
> reason, F9 to F12 did not work for me. Some time in the near future,
> I
> will probably try F11 to F14
$ rpm -qi preupgrade
[...]
preupgrade prepares your
On 03/29/2010 07:43 AM, prakhar gaur wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> This is my first mail to a mailing list , so if i make any mistakes, Sorry.
> I am trying to update my F9 to F12.
> i have to go from F9 to F10, then F10 to F12.
I was only able to use "preupgrade" to go from F9 to F11. For whatever
100 matches
Mail list logo
