Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 04:22:13 -0400, Radek Holy wrote: The most precise description is that it sets the SOLVER_FLAG_ALLOW_UNINSTALL flag which is described here: https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/blob/master/doc/libsolv-bindings.txt#L2024 I looked through that and it isn't easy to unde

Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-22 Thread Radek Holy
- Original Message - > From: "Bruno Wolff III" > To: "Radek Holy" > Cc: "Community support for Fedora users" > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:20:02 PM > Subject: Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-) > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:3

Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:32:58 -0400, Radek Holy wrote: Right, it still does not allow the depsolver to remove a capability at all. It allows it only to replace a package which provides a required capability with another package which provides it as well. Can you describe this more preci

Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-21 Thread Radek Holy
- Original Message - > From: "Bruno Wolff III" > To: "Jan Zelený" > Cc: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 5:54:34 PM > Subject: Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-) > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 17:35:18 +0200, >

Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 17:35:18 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: That's basically what --allowerasing is about. The idea is that when you run upgrade, you most likely don't want this upgrade to remove any of the packages that are currently installed on your system. As the name says, the -- allowerasi

Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-20 Thread Jan Zelený
On 20. 7. 2015 at 10:12:35, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 16:02:11 +0200, > > Jan Zelený wrote: > >On 20. 7. 2015 at 08:57:41, kevin martin wrote: > >> I'm with Jan...Thank God for yum-deprecated. Been trying to get systemd > >> updated with DNF forever and it's been throwin

Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 16:02:11 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: On 20. 7. 2015 at 08:57:41, kevin martin wrote: I'm with Jan...Thank God for yum-deprecated. Been trying to get systemd updated with DNF forever and it's been throwing an error about fedora-release..yum-deprecated has it handled. The

Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-20 Thread Jan Zelený
On 20. 7. 2015 at 08:57:41, kevin martin wrote: > I'm with Jan...Thank God for yum-deprecated. Been trying to get systemd > updated with DNF forever and it's been throwing an error about > fedora-release..yum-deprecated has it handled. The whole skip-broken part > of yum makes it so much easier t

Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-20 Thread kevin martin
I'm with Jan...Thank God for yum-deprecated. Been trying to get systemd updated with DNF forever and it's been throwing an error about fedora-release..yum-deprecated has it handled. The whole skip-broken part of yum makes it so much easier to actually do updates. DNF's handling of broken package

Re: Thank God for yum-deprecated :-)

2015-07-20 Thread Jan Zelený
On 18. 7. 2015 at 17:59:49, Tom Horsley wrote: > I see that dnf, in its infinite wisdom, has classified > ignoring packages it can't find as a bug, therefore > if you say > > dnf install `cat f22-missing.txt` > > to install as much stuff as possible in your new > f22 as you used to have in f20, i