On 10/23/20 2:51 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:02:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Do I need to dnf remove rpmfusion-free-release-32-1.noarch
rpmfusion doesn't even have a testing repo. You need to provide more
details.
Of course they still offer a testing repo for updates
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:02:23 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > Do I need to dnf remove rpmfusion-free-release-32-1.noarch
>
> rpmfusion doesn't even have a testing repo. You need to provide more
> details.
Of course they still offer a testing repo for updates, and its .repo
file is included with
On 10/20/20 12:53 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:37:04 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/20/20 11:12 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I did:
dnf config-manager --set-disabled updates-testing
But then , how to I uninstall the packages depending on updates-testing
Why do you need to
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:37:04 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/20/20 11:12 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > I did:
> > dnf config-manager --set-disabled updates-testing
> >
> > But then , how to I uninstall the packages depending on updates-testing
>
> Why do you need to? Eventually those packages
On 10/20/20 11:12 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I did:
dnf config-manager --set-disabled updates-testing
But then , how to I uninstall the packages depending on updates-testing
Why do you need to? Eventually those packages will end up in the
regular updates repo and you would get them anyway.
ot;
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: testing update
>
> dnf config-manager --disablerepo=updates-testing
>
> Command line error: one of the following arguments is required: --save
> --add-repo --dump --dump-variables --set-enab
On 10/20/20 11:05 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
dnf config-manager --disablerepo=updates-testing
Command line error: one of the following arguments is required: --save
--add-repo --dump --dump-variables --set-enabled --enable --set-disabled
--disable
Sorry, that was the wrong command.
dnf config-
20, 2020 at 8:02 PM
> From: "Samuel Sieb"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: testing update
>
> On 10/20/20 10:57 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > How do I avoid testing update?
>
> If you've somehow enabled the updates-testing repo, then run:
&g
On 10/20/20 10:57 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
How do I avoid testing update?
If you've somehow enabled the updates-testing repo, then run:
sudo dnf config-manager --disablerepo=updates-testing
Do I need to dnf remove rpmfusion-free-release-32-1.noarch
rpmfusion doesn't even have a testing repo
On 11/06/2018 12:17 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Most languages have a math library containing a pi constant that is as
precise as the computer can store. How is using a trig function going
to be more accurate?
This was from back in the early 1980s, when languages didn't have those
constants built
On 11/5/18 9:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/05/2018 09:44 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
pi = 4 arctan (1)
if you need
Excellent! That was exactly what I was going to suggest. Decades ago,
the late Dan Alderson (The man who wrote JPL's main space probe
navigation package.) told me that you should
On 11/05/2018 09:44 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
pi = 4 arctan (1)
if you need
Excellent! That was exactly what I was going to suggest. Decades ago,
the late Dan Alderson (The man who wrote JPL's main space probe
navigation package.) told me that you should always use that because it
gave you
>
> On 11/05/2018 07:49 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > I am sorry for the confusion.
> > I use gnuplot
>
> I don't, so I presume that pi is predefined.
Yes,
pi = 4 arctan (1)
if you need
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To uns
On 11/05/2018 07:49 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I am sorry for the confusion.
I use gnuplot
I don't, so I presume that pi is predefined.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproje
> On 11/05/2018 06:31 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/05/2018 05:32 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >>> sqrt_pi = sqrt (pi)
> >>>
> >>> z (x, y) = x + I * y
> >>> w (z) = faddeeva (z) / sqrt_pi # Normalized
> >>> plot real (w (z (x, 1))
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Good luck.
> >>
> >> How do you initial
On 11/05/2018 06:31 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
On 11/05/2018 05:32 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
sqrt_pi = sqrt (pi)
z (x, y) = x + I * y
w (z) = faddeeva (z) / sqrt_pi # Normalized
plot real (w (z (x, 1))
Good luck.
How do you initialize pi?
___
I do
>
> On 11/05/2018 05:32 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > sqrt_pi = sqrt (pi)
> >
> > z (x, y) = x + I * y
> > w (z) = faddeeva (z) / sqrt_pi # Normalized
> > plot real (w (z (x, 1))
> >
> >
> > Good luck.
>
> How do you initialize pi?
> ___
I do not have.
On 11/05/2018 05:32 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
sqrt_pi = sqrt (pi)
z (x, y) = x + I * y
w (z) = faddeeva (z) / sqrt_pi # Normalized
plot real (w (z (x, 1))
Good luck.
How do you initialize pi?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Hello Ronaldo
Part of my code
I={0,1}
sqrt_pi = sqrt (pi)
z (x, y) = x + I * y
w (z) = faddeeva (z) / sqrt_pi # Normalized
plot real (w (z (x, 1))
Good luck.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: p
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 17:03, Ronaldo Mercado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to test an update to gnuplot from bugzilla #1476616.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476616
>
> I am using fedora 28 and I managed to install the package okay from copr
> I don't know my way around gnuplot.
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 09:06 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I have a default btrfs install of f21.
>>
>> sudo btrfs subvolume list /
>> ID 257 gen 32476 top level 5 path root
>>
>> I copied /etc/snapper/config-templates/default to
>> /etc/snapper/config/default, and edi
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 09:06 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I have a default btrfs install of f21.
>
> sudo btrfs subvolume list /
> ID 257 gen 32476 top level 5 path root
>
> I copied /etc/snapper/config-templates/default to
> /etc/snapper/config/default, and edited /etc/sysconfig/snapper to
> SNA
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> If you go to:
> admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
> and type in kernel, you'll see kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21 is in "testing"
> which translates into
>
> # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21'
>
> If that doesn't wo
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Meikel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> in bugzilla I found a bug
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197842) that adresses an issue
> I have. In a comment from Fedora Update System I can see that
> "kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
On 03/12/2015 03:51 PM, Meikel wrote:
Hi folks,
in bugzilla I found a bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197842) that adresses an
issue I have. In a comment from Fedora Update System I can see that
"kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.".
Can som
My tendency would be to boot the boxes from Flash or DVD and test with
badblocks or fsck nondestructively obtaining a list of problems to then
help decide how to proceed with each box. You could make a Flash drive
with the basic tools and scripts and then clone it to work with several
drives at o
update::
The boxes can be remotely/ssh accessed, so it would be easier if
there's a solution that could allow us to simply run software tests
over the net, to the boxes/drives that are installed/formatted if
possible!!
thanks again!!
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:39 AM, bruce wrote:
> Morning --
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:34:09 -0700, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> As said just a test!
:-(
That's an opportunity for a netiquette reminder:
Instead of sending meaningless test messages to a mailing-list with
thousands of subscribers, one preferably performs such a test in a
different and smarter way:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've written unit files for deluge to be used with systemd. There are
> two unit files:
>
> deluged.service[1]: for the deluged daemon
> deluge-web.service[2]: for the web ui
>
> As far as I know,
> - they need to be copied to /lib/s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/15/2010 07:29 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> A long time ago I got burned with a type in /etc/fstab and back then I
> was told how to test out changes to fstab.
>
> Well I just added my USB drive to fstab and want to make sure I got it
> right.
On 12/15/2010 10:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 05:29 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> But I want to test first before I reboot.
>>
> mount -a
>
> will try to mount everything in fstab with the current options.
>
thanks!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 12/15/2010 05:29 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> But I want to test first before I reboot.
mount -a
will try to mount everything in fstab with the current options.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On 12/15/2010 09:08 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 20:29 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> Well I just added my USB drive to fstab and want to make sure I got it
>> right. The line I added is:
>>
>> /dev/sdb1/media/usbdriveext4defaults1 2
>>
> Do you als
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 20:29 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Well I just added my USB drive to fstab and want to make sure I got it
> right. The line I added is:
>
> /dev/sdb1/media/usbdriveext4defaults1 2
Do you also have the auto-mounter running? Because /media is it'
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
>
> No yum-3.2.28-13 rpm there yet...
There is now (3.2.28-14), and from my initial tests this is working
really well. Thank you so much for this new feature, Seth! Finally,
Debian converts can be happy on Fedora ;-)
-c
--
users mailing list
u
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> You can use the yum-rawhide repo at
>
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
No yum-3.2.28-13 rpm there yet...
-c
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/orphaned-dep-cleanup-in-yum/
>
Hallelujah! Yum's remove-leaves plugin never worked properly for me..
if this works as expected, it will fill a long standing hole in
Fedora's package management.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 1, various timedemos of existing engines in the repo
> 2. unigine 3d benchmark: http://unigine.com/download/
Thanks, Rudolf and the other respondents.
Regarding suggestion 1, which one does you advise?
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@list
1, various timedemos of existing engines in the repo
2. unigine 3d benchmark: http://unigine.com/download/
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guideline
On 10/17/2010 04:21 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sunday 17 October 2010 03:44 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
>>
>> I would like to test the capabilities (speed, 3D, etc.) of my ATI
>> graphics card. Any ideas?
>
> You can try the Phoronix test suite. The version in the repos is old,
> try to get it from the
On Sunday 17 October 2010 03:44 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to test the capabilities (speed, 3D, etc.) of my ATI
> graphics card. Any ideas?
>
You can try the Phoronix test suite. The version in the repos is old,
try to get it from their home page.
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:44:46 +0100
Paul Smith wrote:
> I would like to test the capabilities (speed, 3D, etc.) of my ATI
> graphics card. Any ideas?
Well, there is gltestperf in the mesa-demos rpm, but it crashes
every system I run it on that has an ATI card :-).
--
users mailing list
users@list
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:00:12 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Did you do a long or short SMART test? I've had drives the report OK
> on the short but fail the long test. I figure you ran the long test
> but since you didn't say I wanted to make sure.
I've run both short and long, smart always says not
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 21:55 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I know about the smart tools, but they run disk tests
> pretty much entirely within the disk drive (I think?).
>
> Is there a good tool for testing the whole disk I/O
> system that will wind up exercising the disk, the
> controller/chipset, e
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I know about the smart tools, but they run disk tests
> pretty much entirely within the disk drive (I think?).
>
> Is there a good tool for testing the whole disk I/O
> system that will wind up exercising the disk, the
> controller/chipset, etc
45 matches
Mail list logo
