On Jul 17, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Lists wrote:
> As a ZFS on Linux user, I noticed that there are btrfs packages for Fedora
> 20. Can anybody here comment on their stability? Are you adventurous enough
> to use btrfs on root ? Has it saved your data? Have you lost data because of
> it?
>
> Contex
FYI, i'm using BTRFS for over a year,
Even though it is not a fedora machine, the upstream code remains the same I
guess.
I don't use advanced features of btrfs, (I stil use lvm on top of softraid) but
it has proven for me (in this order)
- reliable enough (never data loss, even after power incid
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Lists wrote:
> Can anybody here comment on their stability?
I used a complicated full-drive btrfs for over a year on Arch Linux with
root, home, opt, pkg, etc. folders as subvolumes with every hour
snapshotting. Anaconda doesn't allow you to install such an elab
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 15:40 -0700, Lists wrote:
> On 07/17/2014 03:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 15:08 -0700, Lists wrote:
> >> As a ZFS on Linux user, I noticed that there are btrfs packages for
> >> Fedora 20. Can anybody here comment on their stability? Are you
> >>
On 07/17/2014 03:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 15:08 -0700, Lists wrote:
As a ZFS on Linux user, I noticed that there are btrfs packages for
Fedora 20. Can anybody here comment on their stability? Are you
adventurous enough to use btrfs on root ? Has it saved your data?
I have been using BTRFS for about a year now and I haven't had any
problems. I think it is stable enough for home use. I can't speak on
business use.
On 07/17/2014 04:08 PM, Lists wrote:
As a ZFS on Linux user, I noticed that there are btrfs packages for
Fedora 20. Can anybody here comment on t
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 15:08 -0700, Lists wrote:
> As a ZFS on Linux user, I noticed that there are btrfs packages for
> Fedora 20. Can anybody here comment on their stability? Are you
> adventurous enough to use btrfs on root ? Has it saved your data? Have
> you lost data because of it?
>
> Con
