Re: Strange problem with chroot

> $ ld.so --help | sed -n '/glibc-hwcaps directories/,$p' > Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order: > x86-64-v4 > x86-64-v3 > x86-64-v2 (supported, searched) I find this a nice example of using UNIX tools. Much as I love them, I could not resist sen

Re: Strange problem with chroot

I saw RedHat with RHEL8 cut off hardware that first release was just 7 years earlier(2012) than RHEL8's release(2019) (so some of the hardware was only 4-5 years old). I always suspected it was the OEM (the board was a version of raid card only used in their hw and in that age of hardware) that wa

Re: Strange problem with chroot

> On 16 Jun 2025, at 18:11, Robert McBroom via users > wrote: > > System dates from 2007. With f41 running would think the Alma OS would also That’s a very old system, which I assume Alma does not support. Fedora and Alma do not make matching choices on CPU support. Fedora deliberately suppor

Re: Strange problem with chroot

On 6/16/25 10:16 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Robert McBroom via users wrote: From the Fedora 41 installation ~]# ld.so --help [...] Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order:  x86-64-v4  x86-64-v3  x86-64-v2 None of those say "supported, searched" which indicates it does

Re: Strange problem with chroot

Robert McBroom via users wrote: > From the Fedora 41 installation > ~]# ld.so --help [...] > Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order: >  x86-64-v4 >  x86-64-v3 >  x86-64-v2 None of those say "supported, searched" which indicates it doesn't support x86-64-v2 or newer. Here is

Re: Strange problem with chroot

On 6/14/25 6:01 AM, Barry Scott wrote: On 14 Jun 2025, at 04:35, Robert McBroom via users wrote: CentOs 9.4 installation is going into kernel panic. Trying to get access to the system from a running Fedora 41 installation. ~]# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/sysimage ~]# for dir in /dev /proc /sys;

Re: Strange problem with chroot

> On 14 Jun 2025, at 14:29, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > You should turn off whatever "helpful" part of your mail > chain converts things it thinks are URLs. :) Oh! Thanks for the heads up I missed the mailer being “helpful”. Barry -- ___ users mail

Re: Strange problem with chroot

Barry Scott wrote: > Run this to find out what your hardware supports: > >ld.so --help You should turn off whatever "helpful" part of your mail chain converts things it thinks are URLs. :) For shell commands, having something stick redirect characters and URLs into them autom

Re: Strange problem with chroot

> On 14 Jun 2025, at 04:35, Robert McBroom via users > wrote: > > CentOs 9.4 installation is going into kernel panic. Trying to get access to > the system from a running Fedora 41 installation. > > ~]# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/sysimage > ~]# for dir in /dev /proc /sys;do mount --bind $dir /mnt/

Re: Strange problem with phpmyadmin after recent dnf update?? Was GNOME Shell integration

On 14 Nov 2023 at 16:06, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote: To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date sent: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:06:52 +1000 Subject:Strange problem with phpmyadmin after recent dnf upate?? Priority: normal Send reply to

Re: strange problem, may be related to ssh

Thanks for the clarification Samuel, On 12/11/2023 19.09, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/11/23 14:07, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote: My SMTP server requires SSL/TLS security, and uploading files to the same site requires sftp. So both run over ssh. This is not correct.  SSL ≠ SSH.  They use similar

Re: strange problem, may be related to ssh

On 11/11/23 14:07, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote: My SMTP server requires SSL/TLS security, and uploading files to the same site requires sftp. So both run over ssh. This is not correct. SSL ≠ SSH. They use similar encryption, but they are different protocols and not using the same port. ___

Re: strange problem, may be related to ssh [resolved]

On 12/11/2023 10.06, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote: On 12/11/23 09:16, Roger Heflin wrote: If connections/files/stuff passes that is less than 1 network packet (about 1500 bytes - header--say 1460 give or take) then this is a sign that a piece of the network somehow has the wrong MTU size. I have

Re: strange problem, may be related to ssh [resolved]

On 12/11/23 09:16, Roger Heflin wrote: If connections/files/stuff passes that is less than 1 network packet (about 1500 bytes - header--say 1460 give or take) then this is a sign that a piece of the network somehow has the wrong MTU size. I have seen network ports not get their MTU set to 1502 o

Re: strange problem, may be related to ssh

On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 5:08 PM wrote: > > Since the middle of the night on 7/Nov, uploading files with ssh is > problematic. > > My SMTP server requires SSL/TLS security, and uploading files to the same > site requires sftp. > So both run over ssh. > > I have a few scripts that run from cron an

Re: strange problem, may be related to ssh

If connections/files/stuff passes that is less than 1 network packet (about 1500 bytes - header--say 1460 give or take) then this is a sign that a piece of the network somehow has the wrong MTU size. I have seen network ports not get their MTU set to 1502 or 1504 and when this happens it causes th

Re: strange problem

Chrome was working fine on this system yesterday.  The upgrade went fine, so I'm really stumped as to why it has stopped working. Paolo On 11/11/18 2:47 PM, stan wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 14:03:31 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: What I don't understand about this problem is why it affects only

Re: strange problem

On 11/11/2018 03:47 PM, stan wrote: Try to remove chrome on the system that doesn't work, and the system that works (be sure to say no to confirmation). Or, just use dnf --assumeno to make sure it doesn't get removed by accident. ___ users mailing lis

Re: strange problem

On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 14:03:31 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: > What I don't understand about this problem is why it affects only one > system.  Chrome on my other system works fine as does chrome on my > android tablet. Plugins? Configuration? Were some packages rejected for update because of de

Re: strange problem

What I don't understand about this problem is why it affects only one system.  Chrome on my other system works fine as does chrome on my android tablet. Paolo On 11/11/18 12:12 PM, stan wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 09:55:06 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: I encountered a strange problem today I'

Re: strange problem

On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 09:55:06 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: > I encountered a strange problem today I'm wondering if someone can > explain what's going on. > > Here's the problem, I have 2 systems running F28, one system was > upgraded from F27 two days ago, the other upgraded yesterday. Both >

Re: Strange problem -

On 02/12/2014 02:56 AM, poma wrote: On 10.02.2014 14:17, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: … But the sledgehammer [bobG, new user] works! Bob http://www.youtube.com/embed/cQl6r0fqRAI?rel=0&border=0&autoplay=1 :) great series. lmao nearly every time i watched it. -- peace out. i

Re: Strange problem -

On 10.02.2014 14:17, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: … > But the sledgehammer [bobG, new user] works! > > Bob > http://www.youtube.com/embed/cQl6r0fqRAI?rel=0&border=0&autoplay=1 :) poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription optio

Re: Strange problem -

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:29:35 -0500 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: > > xfdesktop: Fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on x > server :0.0 > You have a borked X &| Xfce try: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=129274 ___ Regards Frank frankly3d.com -- users

Re: Strange problem -

On 10/02/14 09:00, Frank Murphy wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:46:30 -0500 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: Feb 10 08:33:30 box7 kernel: mei_me :00:03.0: reset: connect/disconnect timeout. What kernel are you using on that box? [bobg@box7 ~]$ uname -a Linux box7 3.12.9-301.fc20

Re: Strange problem -

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:46:30 -0500 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: > Feb 10 08:33:30 box7 kernel: mei_me :00:03.0: reset: > connect/disconnect timeout. What kernel are you using on that box? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917081 also check: https://bbs.archlinux.org

Re: Strange problem -

On 10/02/14 08:22, Frank Murphy wrote: > Xfce is still coming up on console 2. I need to stop whatever causes > console 1 to be active. It appears to be happening when xfce4 starts > since it sits displaying a small progress circle until something > "times-out" and then switches to the usual lar

Re: Strange problem -

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:17:07 -0500 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: > Xfce is still coming up on console 2. I need to stop whatever causes > console 1 to be active. It appears to be happening when xfce4 starts > since it sits displaying a small progress circle until something > "times-o

Re: Strange problem -

On 09/02/14 21:22, poma wrote: > I worked around the problem by creating a new user, that will have to do! > > Bob > That is always a valid choice, however 'xfce4-session-settings', http://docs.xfce.org/xfce/xfce4-session/preferences#session ;) If that doesn't help, man 1 loginctl poma That

Re: Strange problem -

On 10/02/14 04:43, Frank Murphy wrote: That was using a sledgehammer for toilet paper. In Xfce > Application Menu > Settings > Session and Startup > Session > "Clear Saved Session" If you do not want any programs started except those that are in Application Autostart: As above but: > Session an

Re: Strange problem -

On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 20:21:28 -0500 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: > I worked around the problem by creating a new user, that will have to > do! > > Bob That was using a sledgehammer for toilet paper. In Xfce > Application Menu > Settings > Session and Startup > Session > "Clear Save

Re: Strange problem -

On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 21:06:24 -0500 David wrote: > Most users here use KDE or Gnome so I doubt they can help you with a > Xfce problem. I use Xfce. There are also Fedora lists for Gnome and KDE, this is a Fedora user list, not specific to DE X > > But? Want a suggestion? A good one? Ask on

Re: Strange problem -

On 09/02/14 21:06, David wrote: When I offer advice here I am usually ignored. I have offered you advice before with similar results. I know how to solve this but I choose not to give you the information. My apologies David, I try to acknowledge everyone. I also feel this accusation is unjus

Re: Strange problem -

On 10.02.2014 02:21, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > On 09/02/14 13:23, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: >> Fedora 20 64 bit XFCE >> >> When logging out from gui I get: >> >> "Received error while trying to log out >> Session manager must be in idle state when requesting a shu

Re: Strange problem -

On 2/9/2014 8:21 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > On 09/02/14 13:23, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: >> Fedora 20 64 bit XFCE >> >> When logging out from gui I get: >> >> "Received error while trying to log out >> Session manager must be in idle state when requesting a shu

Re: Strange problem -

On 09/02/14 13:23, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: Fedora 20 64 bit XFCE When logging out from gui I get: "Received error while trying to log out Session manager must be in idle state when requesting a shutdown." Each time I reboot a number of windows/tabs are loaded, I go through a