On 08/08/2014 02:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So I am making progress but saw a strange bit.
#parted /dev/sdb mkpart uboot ext3 4 516
# parted /dev/sdb print
Model: Generic- Multi-Card (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 7969MB
Sector size (logical/physic
On Aug 8, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I don't think "uboot" is a valid partition type--it should be
> "primary", "logical" or "extended". Thus the format of the command
> should have been:
Since the disk is GPT there's no such distinction among partitions. Behavior
wise they're pri
On Aug 8, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> So I am making progress but saw a strange bit.
>
> #parted /dev/sdb mkpart uboot ext3 4 516
>
> # parted /dev/sdb print
> Model: Generic- Multi-Card (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdb: 7969MB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Tabl
On 08/08/2014 12:38 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 08/08/2014 06:21 AM, Robert Moskowitz issued this missive:
So I am making progress but saw a strange bit.
#parted /dev/sdb mkpart uboot ext3 4 516
# parted /dev/sdb print
Model: Generic- Multi-Card (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 7969MB
Sector size (logica
On 08/08/2014 06:21 AM, Robert Moskowitz issued this missive:
So I am making progress but saw a strange bit.
#parted /dev/sdb mkpart uboot ext3 4 516
# parted /dev/sdb print
Model: Generic- Multi-Card (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 7969MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Di
