Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-20 07:01, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-19 17:58, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> Well, you can always use https://imgur.com/ and then post the link.  That is >> one way. >> >> Feel free to send directly to me as well.  I have no data limits. :-) > ° > /I'm not sure I an doing this right,

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-19 17:58, Ed Greshko wrote: Well, you can always use https://imgur.com/ and then post the link.  That is one way. Feel free to send directly to me as well.  I have no data limits. :-) ° /I'm not sure I an doing this right, Nautilus: https://imgur.com/RtiyhIG.png                

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-20 05:43, Bob Goodwin wrote: > I can not recall the service used for sending images to the mailing list, but  > I will do that as soon as I get the details Well, you can always use https://imgur.com/ and then post the link.  That is one way. Feel free to send directly to me as well. 

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-19 23:08, Bob Goodwin wrote: > When I say smb that is smb in the left panel of the file manager and smb > appearing under Places You can right-click on that SMB in Places and then select "Remove Shortcut". -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-19 16:55, Ed Greshko wrote: An upgrade won't change anything.  Well, unless you wipe out everything including the user's home directory. ° I have done the system upgrade and it works well but I prefer to start anew with each release, I have another drive and will clear it and i

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-20 03:31, Bob Goodwin wrote: > My first thought is I don't like any of those options. I would rather wait  > for a new release, FC-33 in September if I understand what I read. An upgrade won't change anything.  Well, unless you wipe out everything including the user's home directory.

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-19 14:54, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-19 23:08, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 2020-07-19 10:18, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-19 21:52, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 2020-07-18 18:47, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-18 23:57, Bob Goodwin wrote: Yes it is ready: Press pwr on button, user name, pa

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-19 23:08, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-19 10:18, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-07-19 21:52, Bob Goodwin wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-07-18 18:47, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-18 23:57, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> Yes it is ready: Press pwr on button, user name, password, startx and ll

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-19 21:52, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-18 18:47, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-07-18 23:57, Bob Goodwin wrote: Yes it is ready: Press pwr on button, user name, password, startx and ll  /mnt/smb in the terminal: >> I see.  Well, I've now done it this was as opposed from st

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-19 03:53, Tim via users wrote: Ed Greshko: I hate to say this, but in your situation and the need to satisfy your Apple using family members it may be worth the extra few $ to invest in a NAS that supports NFS, SMB, and AFP. It may help you avoid headaches and keep everyone happier

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-18 18:47, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-18 23:57, Bob Goodwin wrote: Yes it is ready: Press pwr on button, user name, password, startx and ll  /mnt/smb in the terminal: I see.  Well, I've now done it this was as opposed from starting with a GUI login.  I still have no problems. [

Re: Samba problems -

Ed Greshko: >> I hate to say this, but in your situation and the need to satisfy >> your Apple using family members it may be worth the extra few $ to >> invest in a NAS that supports NFS, SMB, and AFP. It may help you >> avoid headaches and keep everyone happier. :-) :-) Bob Goodwin: > Yes I aw

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-18 23:57, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> Yes it is ready: Press pwr on button, user name, password, startx and ll  >> /mnt/smb in the terminal: I see.  Well, I've now done it this was as opposed from starting with a GUI login.  I still have no problems. > [bobg@WS1 ~]$ ll /mnt/smb > total 4 >

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 18:47, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-18 06:06, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 2020-07-17 17:41, Ed Greshko wrote: Correct me if I am wrong. You've not changed anything and yesterday it was working under /mnt/smb and today after powering up it is failing? . That seems to be a true

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-18 06:06, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-17 17:41, Ed Greshko wrote: >> Correct me if I am wrong. >> >> You've not changed anything and yesterday it was working under /mnt/smb and >> today after powering >> up it is failing? > . > That seems to be a true statement, but may only

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 17:41, Ed Greshko wrote: Correct me if I am wrong. You've not changed anything and yesterday it was working under /mnt/smb and today after powering up it is failing? . That seems to be a true statement, but may only be not working for either file manager? I just restarte

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 23:21, Bob Goodwin wrote: > Ed, as for the changes you suggest I believe that describes what I have now  > for the last several days after setting things per you directions? > > The active line in /etc/fstab is: >  //192.168.50.149/bobg    /mnt/smb    cifs > uid=bobg,gid=bobg,credent

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-16 22:46, Ed Greshko wrote: All that said, and with my local testing, there should be no reason to change the server's hostname.  So, leave it as smb. I would like you to make one more test on the client side. I would like you to revert to what a standard fstab entry should be.  (

Re: Samba problems -

On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 22:21 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote: > What I meant was what was wrong with /mnt that made the Fedora devs > decide to create /media to do the same job? It's not quite the same job. /mnt was considered a place where you might mount one thing (such as temporarily connecting another h

Re: Samba problems -

Re: Tim's comment about not naming a server "smb" Bob Goodwin wrote: > I am open to suggestions, can change to whatever common practice > might suggest it ought to be ... Generally speaking, give a device a hostname that's *unique* and useful for you to know what it is. You could call it fred, s

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 12:28, Ed Greshko wrote: > I'm not curious enough to > research it. Or so he said Maybe /media has been there for a long time and I just didn't notice it. The Spec published by the Linux Foundation way back https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_2.3/fhs-2.3.html (Note:

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 12:21, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 07/16/2020 10:03 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-07-17 11:20, Joe Zeff wrote: >>> On 07/16/2020 08:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On the subject of research, I looked into the purpose of /media.  I don't know when that was introduced in Fedora. I

Re: Samba problems -

On 07/16/2020 10:03 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-17 11:20, Joe Zeff wrote: On 07/16/2020 08:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On the subject of research, I looked into the purpose of /media.  I don't know when that was introduced in Fedora. I knew it was there, but I've ignored it.  Anyway, in read

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 12:03, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-07-17 11:20, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 07/16/2020 08:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On the subject of research, I looked into the purpose of /media.  I don't >>> know when that was introduced >>> in Fedora. I knew it was there, but I've ignored it.  Anywa

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 11:20, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 07/16/2020 08:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On the subject of research, I looked into the purpose of /media.  I don't >> know when that was introduced >> in Fedora. I knew it was there, but I've ignored it.  Anyway, in reading >> about it, its purpose is to

Re: Samba problems -

On 07/16/2020 08:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On the subject of research, I looked into the purpose of /media.  I don't know when that was introduced in Fedora. I knew it was there, but I've ignored it.  Anyway, in reading about it, its purpose is to be a place where removable media would be mounte

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 04:14, Bob Goodwin wrote: > Certainly it can wait. Well, it will be yet another day since I've had time to do some research and would like you to try one more thing. On the subject of research, I looked into the purpose of /media.  I don't know when that was introduced in Fedora.

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-16 20:21, Ed Greshko wrote: Yes.  I had been assigning addresses but found letting the router dhcp server do it is much more convenient. I can change them if I want  and make them static so they match the mac addresses for filtering, and whatever ... Nothing is set in concrete, I

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 06:44, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-16 17:43, Ed Greshko wrote: >> OK  Will do it in a bit.  I did forget to ask one question. >> >> Your systems are all using DHCP to get their IP addresses, yes? > ° > Yes.  I had been assigning addresses but found letting the router dhcp

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-16 17:43, Ed Greshko wrote: OK  Will do it in a bit.  I did forget to ask one question. Your systems are all using DHCP to get their IP addresses, yes? ° Yes.  I had been assigning addresses but found letting the router dhcp server do it is much more convenient. I can change t

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 04:14, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > Certainly it can wait. > OK  Will do it in a bit.  I did forget to ask one question. Your systems are all using DHCP to get their IP addresses, yes? -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. _

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-16 16:01, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-17 03:13, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 2020-07-16 14:27, Ed Greshko wrote: So, you can use Thunar to display the share files. Is this sufficient to say it is working?.- ° Yes perhaps, but not the way it should and did work a week or ten days earli

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 03:13, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-16 14:27, Ed Greshko wrote: >> So, you can use Thunar to display the share files. >> >> Is this sufficient to say it is working?.- > ° > Yes perhaps, but not the way it should and did work a week or ten days > earlier, NFS still produces a u

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-16 14:27, Ed Greshko wrote: So, you can use Thunar to display the share files. Is this sufficient to say it is working?.- ° Yes perhaps, but not the way it should and did work a week or ten days earlier, NFS still produces a usable display in Thunar, Samba has changed. I rarely n

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 02:17, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-16 12:39, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-07-17 00:27, Bob Goodwin wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-07-15 01:32, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-15 10:20, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 2020-07-14 20:03, Ed Greshko wrote: >> The share is now, under /mn

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-16 12:39, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-17 00:27, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 2020-07-15 01:32, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-15 10:20, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 2020-07-14 20:03, Ed Greshko wrote: The share is now, under /mnt/smb and you can access them from the command line, yes? Yes it

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 01:36, Ed Greshko wrote: Well, I would never name a host "smb" or anything like that either.  But, apparently, that is what Bod did as one can see from a post from a different thread were he showed. [root@smb bobg]# ll /media/dd2 total 0 At that time, I didn't think it was wort

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-14 19:55, Ed Greshko wrote: Well that is, in part, my point.  There should be no reason to connect to a server called smb by the GUI as the share is already mounted.  The GUI should be treating it as any other mounted file system. He can access the share just fine from the command

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-17 00:27, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-15 01:32, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-07-15 10:20, Bob Goodwin wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-07-14 20:03, Ed Greshko wrote: The share is now, under /mnt/smb and you can access them from the command line, yes? >>> Yes it does that from th

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 12:58, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 07:57:59PM -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: then I thought I'd better try rebooting this computer, ws1. Now after the restart/reboot the network browser displays nothing, not even the Mac portable which I believe is still running.

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 01:32, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-15 10:20, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 2020-07-14 20:03, Ed Greshko wrote: The share is now, under /mnt/smb and you can access them from the command line, yes? Yes it does that from the terminal. So, how about if you navigate from / (a.k.a. File

Re: Samba problems -

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 07:57:59PM -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: > then I thought I'd better try rebooting this computer, > ws1. Now after the restart/reboot the network browser displays nothing, not > even the Mac portable which I believe is still running. Since you disabled Avahi, you shouldn't expe

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 13:32, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-07-15 10:20, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> >> On 2020-07-14 20:03, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> The share is now, under /mnt/smb and you can access them from the command >>> line, yes? >> Yes it does that from the terminal. >> > So, how about if you navigate from

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 13:11, Tim via users wrote: > On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 07:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> There should be no reason to connect to a server >> called smb by the GUI as the share is already mounted. > Personally, I wouldn't be naming things that way. You end up using > names where you expe

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 10:20, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-14 20:03, Ed Greshko wrote: >> The share is now, under /mnt/smb and you can access them from the command >> line, yes? > Yes it does that from the terminal. > So, how about if you navigate from / (a.k.a. File System) to mnt and then to smb

Re: Samba problems -

On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 07:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > There should be no reason to connect to a server > called smb by the GUI as the share is already mounted. Personally, I wouldn't be naming things that way. You end up using names where you expect options, that have the same spelling, etc. It

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-14 20:03, Ed Greshko wrote: The share is now, under /mnt/smb and you can access them from the command line, yes? Yes it does that from the terminal. -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD FEDORA-32/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 __

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 08:03, Ed Greshko wrote: > > The share is now, under /mnt/smb and you can access them from the command > line, yes? > And the GUI for me when I use /mnt   https://imgur.com/gallery/lxViRec -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 07:57, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-14 18:36, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On 2020-07-14 14:02, Ed Greshko wrote: OK, one more thing to try. sudo systemctl --now disable avahi-daemon.service sudo systemctl --now disable avahi-daemon.socket >>> . >>> Did that, w

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-14 18:36, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-07-14 14:02, Ed Greshko wrote: OK, one more thing to try. sudo systemctl --now disable avahi-daemon.service sudo systemctl --now disable avahi-daemon.socket . Did that, what now? I/t has  had no immediately apparent effect ... But maybe an

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 07:16, George N. White III wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 16:29, Bob Goodwin > wrote: > > > > On 2020-07-14 14:24, George N. White III wrote: > > > > Thunar 1.8 uses gvfs for cifs.  Is gvfs installed?  Maybe the > permissions > > are w

Re: Samba problems -

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 16:29, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-14 14:24, George N. White III wrote: > > > > Thunar 1.8 uses gvfs for cifs. Is gvfs installed? Maybe the permissions > > are wrong for the run directory used by gvfs. What is "ls -ld > > /run/user/1000/gvfs"? > ° > [bobg@WS1 ~]

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 03:16, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-14 14:02, Ed Greshko wrote: >> OK, one more thing to try. >> >> sudo systemctl --now disable avahi-daemon.service >> sudo systemctl --now disable avahi-daemon.socket > . > Did that, what now? I/t has  had no immediately apparent effect ..

Re: Samba problems -

On 07/14/2020 01:28 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: Would Viasat stoop to that, seems a different kind of business, i get spam, routed to junk, from Newegg, Amazon, and one credit account too, they would be just one more, but I'm not aware of anything Viasat might have triggered ... IANAL, but if Vias

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-14 14:24, George N. White III wrote: Thunar 1.8 uses gvfs for cifs.  Is gvfs installed?  Maybe the permissions are wrong for the run directory used by gvfs.  What is  "ls -ld /run/user/1000/gvfs"? ° [bobg@WS1 ~]$ ls -ld /run/user/1000/gvfs drwx--. 2 bobg bobg 40 Jul 14 12:21 /

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-14 14:02, Ed Greshko wrote: OK, one more thing to try. sudo systemctl --now disable avahi-daemon.service sudo systemctl --now disable avahi-daemon.socket . Did that, what now? I/t has  had no immediately apparent effect ... But maybe an additional action is required? Does "/

Re: Samba problems -

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 14:05, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-13 17:20, Ed Greshko wrote: > > No matter what the "ping" test shows, > > > > Edit the /etc/nsswitch.conf file to change the hosts: line to > > > > hosts: files dns myhostnamegvfs > > > > And see if thunar works any differentl

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-15 01:04, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-13 17:20, Ed Greshko wrote: >> No matter what the "ping" test shows, >> >> Edit the /etc/nsswitch.conf file to change the hosts: line to >> >> hosts:  files dns myhostname >> >> And see if thunar works any differently.  It sounds, to me,

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-13 17:20, Ed Greshko wrote: No matter what the "ping" test shows, Edit the /etc/nsswitch.conf file to change the hosts: line to hosts:  files dns myhostname And see if thunar works any differently.  It sounds, to me, like there is a network resolution issue going on. ° I cha

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-14 05:57, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-13 17:20, Ed Greshko wrote: >> FirstJust as a*test*  do >> >> ping smb > . > [bobg@WS1 ~]$ ping smb > PING smb (192.168.50.149) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from smb (192.168.50.149): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.382 ms > 64 bytes from sm

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-13 17:20, Ed Greshko wrote: FirstJust as a*test* do ping smb . [bobg@WS1 ~]$ ping smb PING smb (192.168.50.149) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from smb (192.168.50.149): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.382 ms 64 bytes from smb (192.168.50.149): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.342 ms 64 byte

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-14 04:35, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-13 13:29, Ed Greshko wrote: >> When you use thunar or nautilius are there any messages in the journal? >> >> And, on the client side (WS1), what do you get for >> >> grep ^hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf > ° > Before I installed nautilus, thunar wou

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-13 13:29, Ed Greshko wrote: When you use thunar or nautilius are there any messages in the journal? And, on the client side (WS1), what do you get for grep ^hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf ° Before I installed nautilus, thunar would display "smb" in the network browser but now it is sho

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-14 00:12, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-12 21:32, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> I'll report anything significant in the morning, > ° > The computer was shut down overnight and rebooted this morning, the servers > are not shutdown. There was no difference in the Thunar smb display symptoms

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-12 21:32, Bob Goodwin wrote: I'll report anything significant in the morning, ° The computer was shut down overnight and rebooted this morning, the servers are not shutdown. There was no difference in the Thunar smb display symptoms after restarting this morning. i dnf installed

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-12 20:40, Ed Greshko wrote: So, the only problem you have is with Thunar, yes? Maybe logging out and logging back in is needed. . Ok, it's about the end of the day here, had to stop for supper. we'll see if it works differently in the morning. I keep wondering if it is something

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-13 08:26, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-12 20:17, Ed Greshko wrote: >> If that is what it is with the share mounted then everything should work. >> >> As user bobg, not root, what do you get when you do >> >> touch /media/smb/x > . > [bobg@WS1 ~]$ touch /media/smb/x > [bobg@WS1 ~]$

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-12 20:17, Ed Greshko wrote: If that is what it is with the share mounted then everything should work. As user bobg, not root, what do you get when you do touch /media/smb/x . [bobg@WS1 ~]$ touch /media/smb/x [bobg@WS1 ~]$ ll /media/smb/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 bobg bobg 0 Jul 10 17:

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-13 07:46, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-12 19:30, Ed Greshko wrote: >> What do you get for >> >> ll -d /media >> >> and >> >> ll -d /media/smb >> >> ? > . > > What do you get for > > ll -d /media > > and > > ll -d /media/smb > > ? > . > [root@WS1 bobg]# ll -d /media > drwxr

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-12 19:30, Ed Greshko wrote: What do you get for ll -d /media and ll -d /media/smb ? . What do you get for ll -d /media and ll -d /media/smb ? . [root@WS1 bobg]# ll -d /media drwxrwxr-x. 7 root root 4096 Jun 29 13:04 /media [root@WS1 bobg]# ll -d /media/smb drwxr-xr-

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-13 06:15, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-12 17:26, Ed Greshko wrote: >> Oh, yes.  Those are needed to make the permissions and ownership correct. > . > New fstab line:  //192.168.50.149/bobg    /media/smb    cifs > uid=bobg,gid=bobg,credentials=/home/bobg/cred   0 0 > > I did 'syst

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-12 17:26, Ed Greshko wrote: Oh, yes.  Those are needed to make the permissions and ownership correct. . New fstab line:  //192.168.50.149/bobg    /media/smb    cifs uid=bobg,gid=bobg,credentials=/home/bobg/cred   0 0 I did 'systemctl daemon-reload' and umount /media/smb  >  mount

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-13 05:19, Bob Goodwin wrote: > The screen shot had to be copied so J could zoom to the maximum and is > difficult to read Sorry about that. Next time I'll try to remember and increase the font size of the terminal and only take a snapshot of the relevant area. -- The key to gettin

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-13 05:19, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 2020-07-12 16:16, Ed Greshko wrote: >> Have you succeeded in mounting bobg? > . > Yes it mounts as expected with 'mount /media/smb' >> >> Here is what I have >> >> https://imgur.com/gallery/SOdsnlA > . > The screen shot had to be copied so J coul

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-12 16:16, Ed Greshko wrote: Have you succeeded in mounting bobg? . Yes it mounts as expected with 'mount /media/smb' Here is what I have https://imgur.com/gallery/SOdsnlA . The screen shot had to be copied so J could zoom to the maximum and is difficult to read but my fstab

Re: Samba problems -

On 2020-07-13 02:29, Bob Goodwin wrote: > ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: > > Just remember 2 things > > 1.  Check the journal for more info on errors. > > 2.  Use "smbclient -L remote_address" to find the available Sharenames. > > In your case, /home/share was not on the list.  It was "bobg". >

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Craig White wrote: > > Revisiting a thread where you tried to pass off poorly informed opinions > as facts seemed to be rather unnecessary. > If you substitute "is" for "seemed to be rather" from the previous sentence, you obtain a clean, readable sentence in En

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 22:08 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Craig White wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 00:15 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Craig White > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:29 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: >

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Craig White wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 00:15 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Craig White wrote: >> > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:29 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:17 PM, linux guy wrote: >> >> > Surely

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:06:57 -0600 linux guy wrote: > Could you tell me what users you have set up for Samba and what you log in > as ? Since I'm the only one on my internal network, I have everything setup as public shares so no logins are required, and somewhere in there I tell samba to use use

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 00:25 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Craig White wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 19:25 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:53 PM, linux guy wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > I'm finding the online documentation for Samba to be u

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 00:15 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Craig White wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:29 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:17 PM, linux guy wrote: > >> > Surely its not that hard to get Samba going. > >> > > >> > If it w

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 22:11 -0600, linux guy wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Craig White > wrote: > > > > For your problems... > > chkconfig smb on > chkconfig nmb on > service nmb restart > service smb res

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 19:25 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:53 PM, linux guy wrote: >> >> > >> > I'm finding the online documentation for Samba to be umm... wanting.  I'll >> > post up a little HOWTO when I get my NAS

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:29 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:17 PM, linux guy wrote: >> > Surely its not that hard to get Samba going. >> > >> > If it wasn't worth the effort, how else did you enable file sharing on a >

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Craig White wrote: > > For your problems... > > chkconfig smb on > chkconfig nmb on > service nmb restart > service smb restart > > Do you mean systemctl enable smb.service systemctl enable nmb.service systemctl start nmb.service systemctl start smb.service Beca

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:17:23 -0600 > linux guy wrote: > > > Has anyone gotten Samba working from a virgin F15 install ? > > Not exactly. Thank you very much for sharing that, Tom. I find the following two lines very interesting. dns pro

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 19:25 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:53 PM, linux guy wrote: > > > > > I'm finding the online documentation for Samba to be umm... wanting. I'll > > post up a little HOWTO when I get my NAS going. > > > > Samba how-to's always have a short shelf-lif

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 16:53 -0600, linux guy wrote: > I'm having a lot of trouble setting up a Samba share on a virgin F15 > install. > > Right now everything works until I click on a shared file (via Samba). > At that point I get a "the file or folder smb://nas/TEST does not > exist" error. > >

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:29 -0400, Robert Myers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:17 PM, linux guy wrote: > > Surely its not that hard to get Samba going. > > > > If it wasn't worth the effort, how else did you enable file sharing on a > > mixed client network ? > > > > Has anyone gotten Samba wo

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:17 PM, linux guy wrote: > Surely its not that hard to get Samba going. > > If it wasn't worth the effort, how else did you enable file sharing on a > mixed client network ? > > Has anyone gotten Samba working from a virgin F15 install ? > If you want it to work out of th

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:17:23 -0600 linux guy wrote: > Has anyone gotten Samba working from a virgin F15 install ? Not exactly. I used to use the web interface to try and set up samba on each install of a new fedora, but at some point, I could no longer duplicate my working setup by starting from

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

Surely its not that hard to get Samba going. If it wasn't worth the effort, how else did you enable file sharing on a mixed client network ? Has anyone gotten Samba working from a virgin F15 install ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription optio

Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:53 PM, linux guy wrote: > > I'm finding the online documentation for Samba to be umm... wanting.  I'll > post up a little HOWTO when I get my NAS going. > Samba how-to's always have a short shelf-life, because Microsoft wants to make it as hard as possible. In getting