Re: Samba 4 support

2014-12-10 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 12/10/2014 11:41 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Dec 9, 2014 6:44 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" > wrote: > So what is the story? Does Fedora work for a Samba AD? As others have mentioned, not presently. But if you're adventurous: http://negativo17.org/samba-4-activ

Re: Samba 4 support

2014-12-10 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Dec 9, 2014 6:44 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: > So what is the story? Does Fedora work for a Samba AD? As others have mentioned, not presently. But if you're adventurous: http://negativo17.org/samba-4-active-directory-with-bind-dlz-zones-dynamic-dns-updates-windows-static-rpc-2/ -T.C. --

Re: Samba 4 support

2014-12-10 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 12/10/2014 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 10 December 2014 at 08:38, wrote: Indeed, At FOSDEM, two years ago (or is it already three) at de samba-devroom they say that with samba4 you could do a seamless switch from Microsoft-AD to samba4, and back. All major distro's fail to do so,

Re: Samba 4 support

2014-12-10 Thread James Hogarth
On 10 December 2014 at 08:38, wrote: > Indeed, > > At FOSDEM, two years ago (or is it already three) at de samba-devroom they > say that with samba4 you could do a seamless switch from Microsoft-AD to > samba4, and back. > All major distro's fail to do so, because of the HEIMDAL / MIT issue ..

RE: Samba 4 support

2014-12-10 Thread J.Witvliet
Indeed, At FOSDEM, two years ago (or is it already three) at de samba-devroom they say that with samba4 you could do a seamless switch from Microsoft-AD to samba4, and back. All major distro's fail to do so, because of the HEIMDAL / MIT issue ... It looks like this issue is more difficult to s

Re: Samba 4 support

2014-12-09 Thread Robin Laing
On 2014-12-09 19:53, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/09/2014 06:47 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 18:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following response about Fedora and Samba4: "If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see

Re: Samba 4 support

2014-12-09 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 12/09/2014 06:47 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-12-09 18:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following response about Fedora and Samba4: "If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see that Samba 4 uses Heimdal Kerberos libraries

Re: Samba 4 support

2014-12-09 Thread Robin Laing
On 2014-12-09 18:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I was asking about Samba 4 on the Samba list and got the following response about Fedora and Samba4: "If you look thru previous posts to this forum you will see that Samba 4 uses Heimdal Kerberos libraries , while Fedora uses MIT kerberos libraries, s

Re: Samba 4

2013-04-15 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 03/28/2013 02:23 PM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > Unfortunately, no. :-( It seems the samba manual is not telling the truth or there are defaults set that the manual has not been updated to display. I fixed this by setting the following variable: force create mode = 0775 You may also need to use

Re: Samba 4

2013-03-28 Thread Gabriel VLASIU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I'm running into the same thing. Did you figure anything out? Unfortunately, no. :-( Gabriel - -- // Gabriel VLASIU // // OpenGPG-KeyID : 44952F15 // OpenGPG-Fingerprint: 4AC5 7C26 2FE9 02D

Re: Samba 4

2013-03-28 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 01/31/2013 08:10 AM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > The important thing here is "create mask". I do not want all files created > by users to be executable in linux. > > The same definition work in samba 4 with the exception of running windoze > .exe files from the share. In windoze, there is no read

Re: Samba 4

2013-02-20 Thread Reindl Harald
raproject.org > [users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Kleber Rocha > [kli...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:14 PM > To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: Samba 4 > > Samba4 on fedora don't support Domain Control setup, here you can read abou

RE: Samba 4

2013-02-20 Thread Shelby, James
Behalf Of Kleber Rocha [kli...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:14 PM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: Samba 4 Samba4 on fedora don't support Domain Control setup, here you can read about this: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/MIT_KDC 2013/2/20 Pedro

Re: Samba 4

2013-02-20 Thread Kleber Rocha
MIT Kerberos 5 Support === Fedora is using MIT Kerberos implementation as its Kerberos infrastructure of choice. The Samba build in Fedora is using MIT Kerberos implementation in order to allow system-wide interoperability between both desktop and server applications running on

Re: Samba 4

2013-02-20 Thread Kleber Rocha
Samba4 on fedora don't support Domain Control setup, here you can read about this: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/MIT_KDC 2013/2/20 Pedro Silva > 2013/2/20 Reindl Harald : > > > > > > Am 20.02.2013 20:29, schrieb Pedro Silva: > >> In fedora 18 installed package "samba" and then try to

Re: Samba 4

2013-02-20 Thread Pedro Silva
2013/2/20 Reindl Harald : > > > Am 20.02.2013 20:29, schrieb Pedro Silva: >> In fedora 18 installed package "samba" and then try to find the command >> installed "samba-tool" and not against. The >> samba in fedora does not have this command? > > what is the command supposed to do? > > i am using

Re: Samba 4

2013-02-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.02.2013 20:29, schrieb Pedro Silva: > In fedora 18 installed package "samba" and then try to find the command > installed "samba-tool" and not against. The > samba in fedora does not have this command? what is the command supposed to do? i am using samba since many years including now sa