Markus Lindholm writes:
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Multilib version problems found. This often means that the root
>cause is something else and multilib version checking is just
>pointing out that there is a problem. Eg.:
> ...
I found that removing just the o
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:25:44 +0100, Markus Lindholm wrote:
>Protected multilib versions: firefox-26.0-5.fc20.x86_64 !=
> firefox-26.0-3.fc20.x86_64
It seems you've messed up your installation a bit further.
Examine that later.
First try:
setenforce 0
yum clean metadata
yum --enabl
I got also hit by this nfs-utils/selinux-policy issue.
Tried to do a yum reinstall \* but it didn't go through. It gave the following
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: 32:bind-libs-9.9.4-8.fc20.i686 (fedora)
Requires: bind-license = 32:9.9.4-8.fc20
Installed
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:33:33PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> > On 01/17/2014 11:46 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > > You should reinstall all the packages that had a scriptlet failure but
> > > were able to install. I had the same
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 11:46 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > You should reinstall all the packages that had a scriptlet failure but
> > were able to install. I had the same issue, in my case however I was
> > trying to install a few new packages. So I
On 01/17/2014 11:46 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> You should reinstall all the packages that had a scriptlet failure but
> were able to install. I had the same issue, in my case however I was
> trying to install a few new packages. So I simply did yum history undo,
> and repeated the original command.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:39:34AM -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> So I picked the wrong time to upgrade my laptop from F19 to F20 via yum!
>
> The result was a very large number of RPM scriptlet failures. I've
> worked around the fatal errors (with 'setenforce 0'), and I've since
> updated my SELinu
