On 25/10/22 11:16, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Oct 22, 2022, at 21:56, Stephen Morris
wrote:
Hi,
As part of the install of F36 from the live CD I have, there is a
question asking whether or not to install 3rd party repositories. I
have done the install twice and replied to the message i
On Oct 22, 2022, at 21:56, Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> Hi,
> As part of the install of F36 from the live CD I have, there is a
> question asking whether or not to install 3rd party repositories. I have done
> the install twice and replied to the message in the affirmative both times,
> and
On 7/11/19 12:05 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> I just realized I didn't have the "tainted" repos installed.
I know that feeling. :-)
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default
color scheme
___
users mailing list -- u
On 7/10/19 8:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 7/11/19 11:57 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Which repo file did you install? I'm hoping you used the -release rpms from
rpmfusion.
But you must have added some other repo as well though. I don't see any
dvb-firmware
package in either Fedora or rpmfusion.
[
On 7/10/19 7:05 PM, JD wrote:
warning:
/var/cache/dnf/rpmfusion-free-updates-c9c282509e45419b/packages/mpv-0.29.1-6.fc30.x86_64.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c0aeda6e: NOKEY
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free -
Updates 0.0 B/s | 0
B
On 7/11/19 11:57 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 7/10/19 8:47 PM, JD wrote:
>> Installed the repo file, but
>>
>> dnf install \*-firmware
>>
>> yields
>>
>> rror: Transaction check error:
>> file /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-dec.fw conflicts between attempted
>> installs of
>> ivtv-firmware-2:200
On 7/10/19 8:47 PM, JD wrote:
Installed the repo file, but
dnf install \*-firmware
yields
rror: Transaction check error:
file /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-dec.fw conflicts between attempted
installs of ivtv-firmware-2:20080701-36.fc30.noarch and
dvb-firmware-20170329-4.git3fef04a.fc30.n
On 7/11/19 10:05 AM, JD wrote:
> # dnf -y install smplayer
> Last metadata expiration check: 5:42:42 ago on Wed 10 Jul 2019 08:11:20 PM
> Boise.
> Dependencies resolved.
> ===
>
> P
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 9:25 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Change boot parameters
>
> # grub2-editenv - set kernelopts="root=UUID=blahblahblahuuidblahblah
> ro rootflags=subvol=root30 enable_mtrr_cleanup=1 zswap.enabled=1
> zswap.max_pool_percent=25 zswap.compressor=lz4 no_console_suspend"
You can al
By the way, there really is a minus symbol in the second position. I
think that's the placeholder for [FILE] if you look at the man page
for grub2-editenv, and that file is the grubenv. And now I'm gonna
look at some Rube Goldberg cartoons.
--
Chris Murphy
_
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 8:36 AM Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> I have theoretically disabled the BLS stuff
> (so I can boot fedora 30 with the configfile
> command from an older grub that knows nothing
> of the BLS support in the configfile).
>
> This worked, but now I wonder about the state
> of the rpmfu
On 27/06/16 17:28, Clifford Snow wrote:
I use the non free rpmfusion for Nvidia drivers. (The nouveau doesn't
work for my card, no or insufficient thermal controls.) Where is the
best place to ask for drivers compiled for the latest kernel, 4.5.7-300?
Thanks,
Clifford
Just installed a new syst
On 06/27/2016 07:28 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
I use the non free rpmfusion for Nvidia drivers. (The nouveau doesn't
work for my card, no or insufficient thermal controls.) Where is the
best place to ask for drivers compiled for the latest kernel, 4.5.7-300?
Thanks,
Clifford
--
I had to expli
On 06/28/16 08:23, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Do you use the akmods or the kmods? I'm using kmods which are precompiled as
> I understand.
I use akmods so as not to have to wait for the fine folks at rpmfusion to
update after a
kernel update.
--
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing li
Do you use the akmods or the kmods? I'm using kmods which are precompiled
as I understand.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/28/16 07:28, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
> > I use the non free rpmfusion for Nvidia drivers. (The nouveau doesn't
> work for my card,
> > no or insuf
On 06/28/16 07:28, Clifford Snow wrote:
> I use the non free rpmfusion for Nvidia drivers. (The nouveau doesn't work
> for my card,
> no or insufficient thermal controls.) Where is the best place to ask for
> drivers
> compiled for the latest kernel, 4.5.7-300?
rpmfusion is up and running with
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:43:47 -0700
CS DBA wrote:
> Should I leave the testing repos enabled? Has the rpmfusion repos
> changed such that I should want this?
Those are the only repos that contain anything in f23
rpmfusion at the moment. When the rpmfusion folks
think they actually have a stable
On 06/08/2015 09:38 PM, William Biggs wrote:
<>
> Thank's for the info if look like it was a server error or they was
> rebuilding the site it back up today
again, only the real Ed Greshko knows for sure. ;-)
--
peace out.
If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
...oh
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 02:10 -0500, g wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2015 12:34 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 06/07/2015 10:22 PM, g wrote:
> > >It's not just you!http://www.edgreshko.com looks down from
> > > here.
> >
> > Checking, whois doesn't recognize the domain.
>
> correct, i put 'ed' in by err.
On 06/08/2015 12:39 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 08.06.2015, g wrote:
>
>> It's not just you! http://www.edgreshko.com looks down from here.
>
> His email suggests the domain is "greshko.com", not "edgreshko.com".
> The former resolves just fine.
you have to excuse a chemo brain. ;-)
greshk
On 06/08/2015 12:34 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/07/2015 10:22 PM, g wrote:
>>It's not just you!http://www.edgreshko.com looks down from here.
>
> Checking, whois doesn't recognize the domain.
correct, i put 'ed' in by err. yet,
It's not just you! http://www.greshko.com looks down from
On 08.06.2015, g wrote:
> It's not just you! http://www.edgreshko.com looks down from here.
His email suggests the domain is "greshko.com", not "edgreshko.com".
The former resolves just fine.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
h
On 06/07/2015 10:22 PM, g wrote:
It's not just you!http://www.edgreshko.com looks down from here.
Checking, whois doesn't recognize the domain.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On 06/07/2015 08:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/08/15 08:47, William Biggs wrote:
>> I try to setup a new computer .
<<>>
> The site is up but it seems a general problem. Probably a file
> server problem on their side as none of the install rpms can be
> downloaded.
what i your take on this s
On 06/07/2015 07:05 PM, William Biggs wrote:
It's not just you!http://rpmfusion-free-release-22.noarch.rpm looks
down from here.
Well, at least you know now.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 18:01 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/07/2015 05:47 PM, William Biggs wrote:
> > I try to setup a new computer . I'm trying to add rpmfusion on f22
> > but
> > when I click the f22 repo I get this error . Any ide how to report
> > this
> > to them so it can get fixed oll so t
On 06/08/15 08:47, William Biggs wrote:
> I try to setup a new computer . I'm trying to add rpmfusion on f22 but
> when I click the f22 repo I get this error . Any ide how to report this
> to them so it can get fixed oll so the non-free is same error
> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/de
On 06/07/2015 05:47 PM, William Biggs wrote:
I try to setup a new computer . I'm trying to add rpmfusion on f22 but
when I click the f22 repo I get this error . Any ide how to report this
to them so it can get fixed oll so the non-free is same error
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/deve
On 20 December 2014 at 16:29, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 16:10:28 +0200
> Ahmad Samir wrote:
>
>> 1:343.22-4.fc21
>
> 343 is different than 340 (I don't understand nvidia's
> naming conventions, but 343 is apparently some sort
> of "test" version, whereas 340 is the production
> vers
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 16:10:28 +0200
Ahmad Samir wrote:
> 1:343.22-4.fc21
343 is different than 340 (I don't understand nvidia's
naming conventions, but 343 is apparently some sort
of "test" version, whereas 340 is the production
version - or something like that). Only the 340
claims full support f
On 18 December 2014 at 16:42, Tom Horsley wrote:
> The most irritating thing I note that's missing is the
> akmod-nvidia-340xx package these instructions claim
> I can use:
>
> http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
>
It's there:
$ yum list akmod-nvidia*34*
Loaded plugins: changelog, tsflags
Available
The most irritating thing I note that's missing is the
akmod-nvidia-340xx package these instructions claim
I can use:
http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
I've got a relatively new maxwell nvidia card, and I suspect
I need this driver to get 3D working.
Also the table on the rpmfusion home page for
On 12/18/2014 06:01 AM, Marco Guazzone wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:20:06 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
This no one told me to expect: it said the RPMfusion non-free packages
for F21 were not ready.
That's very vague. Care to expand on it?
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:20:06 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
>
>> This no one told me to expect: it said the RPMfusion non-free packages
>> for F21 were not ready.
>
> That's very vague. Care to expand on it?
>
> Do you refer to the rpmfusion.org
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:20:06 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
> This no one told me to expect: it said the RPMfusion non-free packages
> for F21 were not ready.
That's very vague. Care to expand on it?
Do you refer to the rpmfusion.org web page? Or a specific error?
The repository for F21 is available:
Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:02:43 +0100
Bob Marcan kirjoitti:
> It is available now.
>
Noticed, thanks.
But upgraded with pgpcheck. That didn't work..
Jarmo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:47:30 +0200
jarmo wrote:
> Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:55:50 +0100
> Michael Schwendt kirjoitti:
>
>
> > What error/problem do you see? Anything with their own mirror manager?
> > The repo tree for '21' is available, at least:
>
> I get no more mirrors available... And looking
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:33:41 +0100,
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote:
Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21..
Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the one
that targets Fedora 21. There even is a fresh
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:55:50 +0100
Michael Schwendt kirjoitti:
> What error/problem do you see? Anything with their own mirror manager?
> The repo tree for '21' is available, at least:
I get no more mirrors available... And looking at
http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration
There's not yet any 21...
On 12/10/2014 06:55 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:38:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
On 12/10/2014 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote:
Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21..
Due to their different developmen
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:38:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
> On 12/10/2014 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote:
> >
> >> Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21..
> > Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the o
On Dec 10, 2014 4:38 AM, "Temlakos" wrote:
>
> On 12/10/2014 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote:
>>
>>> Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21..
>>
>> Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the one
>>
On 12/10/2014 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote:
Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21..
Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the one
that targets Fedora 21. There even is a fresh -release-21 packag
On 12/10/2014 05:01 AM, jarmo wrote:
Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21..
Jarmo
That's what I'm waiting for: for RPMfusion, the google repo, and the
Adobe repo to catch up with the new release. How long would anyone
suggest I wait?
Temlakos
--
users mailing list
users
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:01:37 +0200, jarmo wrote:
> Seems, that RPMFUSION is not yet up to date with Fedora 21..
Due to their different development model, their Rawhide repo is the one
that targets Fedora 21. There even is a fresh -release-21 package in it
since yesterday. Whether the repo is comp
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Got the f21 rpmfusion repos installed by guessing the
> URL from the f20 URLs which are the latest listed on
> the rpmfusion web page :-).
Under "Command Line Setup using rpm" there is link to install
RPMFusion repos for Fedora 14 to the most
On 07/08/12 09:44, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
and the problem persists.. is there a problem with packaging?
Thanks!
Adrian
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/mailman/listinfo/rpmfusion-users
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
Am 14.06.2012 16:13, schrieb Neal Becker:
> I tried from 2 different machines. I tried yum clean all. I get:
>
> http://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/rpmfusion/nonfree/fedora/updates/17/x86_64/repodata/50a3ec209ea701cb92976a80a229cb43674186ce36b0d16961f487b2276561b0-
> primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 14]
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:20:42 -0600, LG (Lawrence) wrote:
> It can not find the right keys. It is not pointed in the right
> direction. I truly don't understand except it ask for a key and then
> says it is wrong.
Still not enough details. Consider quoting something next time.
Meanwhile, I've fi
It can not find the right keys. It is not pointed in the right
direction. I truly don't understand except it ask for a key and then
says it is wrong.
On 11/01/2011 09:15 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
When will the rpmfusion respository
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> When will the rpmfusion respository be fixed.
> --
> Lawrence Graves All things are workable but don't all things work.
if you don't tell what are the problem, then never
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
msn, google talk: ita...@is
On 08/15/2011 01:36 AM, Oluwagbenga Shobowale wrote:
> Which means your dns is looking the wrong way. Nslook domain.com or dig
> domain.com is the command to use.
> You would need to check name server that you are using it might be using
> cached info.
> Oluwagbenga Shobowale
Yeah that was the pr
Which means your dns is looking the wrong way. Nslook domain.com or dig
domain.com is the command to use.
You would need to check name server that you are using it might be using cached
info.
Oluwagbenga Shobowale
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subsc
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:52 -0400, james tate wrote:
> On 08/14/2011 11:39 AM, Oluwagbenga Shobowale wrote:
> > Why not the repository and do an nslookup on the domains is should confirm
> > if the file is corrupt.
> > Oluwagbenga Shobowale
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: james tate
>
On 08/14/2011 11:39 AM, Oluwagbenga Shobowale wrote:
> Why not the repository and do an nslookup on the domains is should confirm if
> the file is corrupt.
> Oluwagbenga Shobowale
>
> -Original Message-
> From: james tate
> Sender: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Aug
Why not the repository and do an nslookup on the domains is should confirm if
the file is corrupt.
Oluwagbenga Shobowale
-Original Message-
From: james tate
Sender: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:21:10
To: Fedora user-lists
Reply-To: Community support fo
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Lawrence E Graves
wrote:
> I am unable to install the rpmfusion repos. Please advise.
> Error message says it cannot connect.
1. Do you mean that you cannot download the rpmfusion configuration
file from http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration/?
or
2. Yum fails to conn
On 06/22/2011 06:02 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> I am unable to install the rpmfusion repos. Please advise.
> Error message says it cannot connect.
Use download2.rpmfusion.org
download1 is down
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
2011/5/25 Michael Schwendt
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 13:38:00 -0500, ME wrote:
>
> > Just that.
> >
> > Anyone here knows when RPMFusion for F15 is going to jump into the stable
> > branch?
>
> It has built against Fedora 15 Branched + Updates the whole time, so far,
> and still does. What's missing
On Wed, 25 May 2011 13:38:00 -0500, ME wrote:
> Just that.
>
> Anyone here knows when RPMFusion for F15 is going to jump into the stable
> branch?
It has built against Fedora 15 Branched + Updates the whole time, so far,
and still does. What's missing is the jump to Fedora 16 development.
--
us
Darr kirjoitti maanantai, 14. kesäkuuta 2010 05:02:25:
> The simplest way is open Firefox, surf to
> http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration
> then click the pertinent links under Graphical Setup.
During weekend, that didn't work either.
Jarmo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
The simplest way is open Firefox, surf to
http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration
then click the pertinent links under Graphical Setup.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 13/06/10 15:09, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>> I'm trying to set up the RPMFusion Depository on a x86_64 system running
>
> Enquire on rpmfusion.org.
> Would it not make more sence.
> they have a mailing list.
> http://lists.rpmfusion.org/mailma
Am 13.06.2010 16:09, schrieb Gerhard Magnus:
> I'm trying to set up the RPMFusion Depository on a x86_64 system running
> FC13. According to the "Personal Guide" at
> http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f13.html#yum
> I need to run these two commands
>
> rpm -ivh
> http://download1.rpmfusi
On 13/06/10 15:09, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
> I'm trying to set up the RPMFusion Depository on a x86_64 system running
Enquire on rpmfusion.org.
Would it not make more sence.
they have a mailing list.
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/mailman/listinfo/rpmfusion-users
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encode
65 matches
Mail list logo
