On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:18:30 -0600 jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 14.04.2015 22:51, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> > There are enough Fedora's kernels for narrow down the search, prior to
> > bisect.
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel
> >
> >
> >
>
> I booted 3.18.5-101.fc20.x86_64
>
> and
On 14.04.2015 22:51, Heinz Diehl wrote:
There are enough Fedora's kernels for narrow down the search, prior to bisect.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel
I booted 3.18.5-101.fc20.x86_64
and hibernation still does not work.
But when I was still running f20, it was working
On 14.04.2015 22:51, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 14.04.2015, poma wrote:
>
>> This title as a statement in itself is actually accurate,
>> but *essentially* it is completely misfired.
>
> Of course it is, and I'm aware that it contains a mistake.
> That can easily happen when you are writing while d
On 04/14/2015 06:36 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/14/2015 05:31 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 04/14/2015 06:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/14/2015 04:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I have 16GB swap, and 8GB RAM.
So, what you suspect is not the case.
It probably wouldn't hurt to check how much of your RAM and s
On 04/14/2015 05:31 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 04/14/2015 06:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/14/2015 04:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I have 16GB swap, and 8GB RAM.
So, what you suspect is not the case.
It probably wouldn't hurt to check how much of your RAM and swap are
available:
free -h
It's probably
On 04/14/2015 06:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/14/2015 04:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I have 16GB swap, and 8GB RAM.
So, what you suspect is not the case.
It probably wouldn't hurt to check how much of your RAM and swap are
available:
free -h
It's probably not an issue, and you needn't post th
On 04/14/2015 04:43 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I have 16GB swap, and 8GB RAM.
So, what you suspect is not the case.
It probably wouldn't hurt to check how much of your RAM and swap are
available:
free -h
It's probably not an issue, and you needn't post the results unless
there's something odd abo
On 04/14/2015 04:30 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 04/14/2015 02:18 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 14.04.2015, John Schmitt wrote:
Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I
agree.
It simply doesn't work..
However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, usi
Thank you John.
Is anyone working on this bug?
I did not have this problem in 3.17 and prior.
On 04/14/2015 02:57 PM, John Schmitt wrote:
Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I
agree.
However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, using
maxcpus=1 o
On 04/14/2015 02:18 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 14.04.2015, John Schmitt wrote:
Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I agree.
It simply doesn't work..
However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, using
maxcpus=1 on your grub command line is going
On 14.04.2015, John Schmitt wrote:
> Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I agree.
It simply doesn't work..
> However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, using
> maxcpus=1 on your grub command line is going to apply only until your
> frozen system
Using maxcpus=1 in your grub command line is an ugly work-around, I agree.
However, if your machine is waking up from sleep or hibernate, using
maxcpus=1 on your grub command line is going to apply only until your
frozen system image (that is, the image of your running kernel that was
running on a
On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> So, use maxcpus=1 during first boot and 2nd boot?
The machine is a quadcore XEON, reducing it to a single-core is not really
something I want.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On 04/14/2015 12:44 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
Also, I am losing files!!! Sorry for this long listing, but I think
something is seriously wrong with the hibernation code.
Does S2R work for you?
Anyway, I have debugged some S2D problems in the last months, and my gut
On 14.04.2015 08:44, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
>
>> Also, I am losing files!!! Sorry for this long listing, but I think
>> something is seriously wrong with the hibernation code.
>
> Does S2R work for you?
>
> Anyway, I have debugged some S2D problems in the last months,
On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> Also, I am losing files!!! Sorry for this long listing, but I think
> something is seriously wrong with the hibernation code.
Does S2R work for you?
Anyway, I have debugged some S2D problems in the last months, and my gut feel
says you're most probably right. The
On 04/13/2015 08:32 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 04/13/2015 02:00 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 13.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
I hibernated and next day I powered up. My previous session was not
restored; i.e., Logged in as normal login and had to start all the
apps all over again.
https://www.kernel.org
On 04/13/2015 02:00 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 13.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
I hibernated and next day I powered up. My previous session was not
restored; i.e., Logged in as normal login and had to start all the
apps all over again.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debuggi
On 13.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> I hibernated and next day I powered up.
> My previous session was not restored;
> i.e., Logged in as normal login and had to
> start all the apps all over again.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
--
users mailing list
users@lis
19 matches
Mail list logo
