Michael,
On 2025-04-28 04:42, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 02:59:55 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> If you prefix your command with e.g. LC_ALL=en_AU.UTF-8 what
> happens?
No difference / improvement.
Then I repeat my request to see example output.
Your first key's stop pos
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 02:59:55 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> > If you prefix your command with e.g. LC_ALL=en_AU.UTF-8 what
> > happens?
>
>
> No difference / improvement.
Then I repeat my request to see example output.
Your first key's stop position is at end of line, which is very generous.
Michael,
On 2025-04-28 00:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 22:02:47 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
sort: text ordering performed using simple byte comparison
What's your locale?
C
If you prefix your command with e.g. LC_ALL=en_AU.UTF-8 what happens?
No difference / imp
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 22:02:47 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> sort: text ordering performed using simple byte comparison
What's your locale?
If you prefix your command with e.g. LC_ALL=en_AU.UTF-8 what happens?
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.f
On 2025-04-27 21:15, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:12:55 +1000, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
People,
For the attached file these work:
sort -k 1.11,1.18n t
sort -k 1.3,1.6n t
but this doesn't:
sort -k 1.8 -k 1.3,1.6n t
Why is this?
Add option --debug, show the output
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:12:55 +1000, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
> People,
>
> For the attached file these work:
>
> sort -k 1.11,1.18n t
> sort -k 1.3,1.6n t
>
> but this doesn't:
>
> sort -k 1.8 -k 1.3,1.6n t
>
> Why is this?
Add option --debug, show the output you get, and describe wha
