Re: Partition fuckup

2013-07-26 Thread Martin Skjöldebrand
On Friday 26 July 2013 19.38.06 Paul W. Frields wrote: > > I really like how you quoted my reply which thanked someone for sending > > input to my question and saying I should be banned to post to the list > > ... > > > > OK, I'll never thank anyone ever again > > Your thanks were very poli

Re: Partition fuckup

2013-07-26 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 08:05:01PM +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: > On Friday 26 July 2013 08.58.30 Alan Findly wrote: > > On 7/26/2013 2:40 AM, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: > > > On Friday 26 July 2013 17.47.16 David Beveridge wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Martin Skjöldebrand > >

Re: Partition fuckup

2013-07-26 Thread Martin Skjöldebrand
On Friday 26 July 2013 08.58.30 Alan Findly wrote: > On 7/26/2013 2:40 AM, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: > > On Friday 26 July 2013 17.47.16 David Beveridge wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Martin Skjöldebrand > >> > >> wrote: > >>> I want them the other way round really. > >>> What woul

Re: Partition fuckup

2013-07-26 Thread Digimer
On 26/07/13 11:05, Dave Ihnat wrote: Once, long ago--actually, on Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:58:30AM CDT--Alan Findly (afin...@ronan.net) said: Using this kind of language on this list is against the guidlines. Well, yes, but... This user should be banned from future posting. Excessive for a

Re: Partition fuckup

2013-07-26 Thread Dave Ihnat
Once, long ago--actually, on Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:58:30AM CDT--Alan Findly (afin...@ronan.net) said: > Using this kind of language on this list is against the guidlines. Well, yes, but... > This user should be banned from future posting. Excessive for a first mistake, especially if it's not

Re: Partition fuckup

2013-07-26 Thread Alan Findly
On 7/26/2013 2:40 AM, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: On Friday 26 July 2013 17.47.16 David Beveridge wrote: On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: I want them the other way round really. What would be the best way of trying to achieve this? You can do it with Logical Volume

Re: Partition fuckup

2013-07-26 Thread Martin Skjöldebrand
On Friday 26 July 2013 17.47.16 David Beveridge wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Martin Skjöldebrand > > wrote: > > I want them the other way round really. > > What would be the best way of trying to achieve this? > > You can do it with Logical Volume Manager, > assuming LVM was used to

Re: Partition fuckup

2013-07-26 Thread David Beveridge
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: > I want them the other way round really. > What would be the best way of trying to achieve this? You can do it with Logical Volume Manager, assuming LVM was used to create the partitions. This is a procedure I use to remove the /home

Re: Partition fuckup

2013-07-25 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 26.07.2013, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: > / is 50 Gb > /home is 250 Gb > I want them the other way round really. > What would be the best way of trying to achieve this? This seems quite fine to me. Anyway, if you want to change this, the easiest way would be to make a backup og both on an e