On 6/21/19 12:33 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Is it an issue with the stick, or it is because I have not been able to
configure properly the bios to boot on an external USB stick (efi?) ?
Check in the BIOS to make sure there is a USB option in the EFI boot
list. You can also try to disable legacy
)380395988
===
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 7:58 PM
> From: "Gordon Messmer"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: New install
>
> On 6/21/19 5:35 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> &g
On 6/21/19 5:35 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
But I get the following message:
Your bios-based system needs a special partition to boot from a GPT disk label.
To continue please create a 1Mb /biosboot type
There is already a fedora installed on sdb
Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT.
Numb
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:25 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I cannot swap the cables, one is a Sata (3.5) and the other one
> is a SSH on the mother board.
>
I like seeing my drives in a certain order to satisfy my OCD but it doesn't
really matter...
Thanks,
Richard
I cannot swap the cables, one is a Sata (3.5) and the other one
is a SSH on the mother board.
>
> Allegedly, on or about 20 February 2019, Patrick Dupre sent:
> > I got a machine with 1 ssd and on HD.
> > The ssd shows up in sdb, with the HD shows up in sda.
> > I could not change from the BIOS th
Allegedly, on or about 20 February 2019, Patrick Dupre sent:
> I got a machine with 1 ssd and on HD.
> The ssd shows up in sdb, with the HD shows up in sda.
> I could not change from the BIOS the order.
For future reference: If they both use the same interface type, such
as SATA, then you probabl
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:09 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> The issue is solved.
> Because I did not boot on the SUB live in UEFI, the install was not
> compatible with a UEFI
> boot.
>
> Sorry for the disturbance.
>
It's not intuitive! But that was going to be my next question, glad you
figured it o
The issue is solved.
Because I did not boot on the SUB live in UEFI, the install was not compatible with a UEFI
boot.
Sorry for the disturbance.___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists
"Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: New install
I was temporarily not able to ssh into my home machine, but here's some examples of what you should see for a UEFI install:
$ sudo parted -l
...
Model: NVMe Device (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 500GB
Sector
20, 2019 at 2:27 PM
From: "Richard Shaw"
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: New install
I was temporarily not able to ssh into my home machine, but here's some examples of what you should see for a UEFI install:
$ sudo parted -l
...
Model:
ity support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: New install
I was temporarily not able to ssh into my home machine, but here's some examples of what you should see for a UEFI install:
$ sudo parted -l
...
Model: NVMe Device (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 500GB
Sector size (log
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 12:41 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Thank for the feedback,
>
> May I shuld have say something.
> When I got the SSD, there was a Ubuntu install taht I destroyed, but I kept
> the 2 first
> partitions:
> Device StartEnd Sectors Size Type
> /dev/sdb1
20, 2019 at 8:20 PM
From: "Richard Shaw"
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: New install
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:08 AM Patrick Dupre <pdu...@gmx.com> wrote:
Hello,
I need help!
I got a machine with 1 ssd and on HD.
The ssd shows up in sdb, with
I was temporarily not able to ssh into my home machine, but here's some
examples of what you should see for a UEFI install:
$ sudo parted -l
...
Model: NVMe Device (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 500GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Si
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:08 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need help!
> I got a machine with 1 ssd and on HD.
> The ssd shows up in sdb, with the HD shows up in sda.
> I could not change from the BIOS the order.
> The machine is UEFI, then I guess that it does not really matter.
>
No,
On 13/2/19 7:59 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/12/19 1:28 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I have installed Windows 10 on my raid system as that was the
only OS the new motherboard provided raid drivers for at install
time. The install of Windows 10 was done in UEFI mode (albeit there
doesn't appea
On 2/12/19 1:28 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I have installed Windows 10 on my raid system as that was the only
OS the new motherboard provided raid drivers for at install time. The
install of Windows 10 was done in UEFI mode (albeit there doesn't appear
to be a UEFI partition on the ssd wind
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:05:47 +1030
Leo Simmonds wrote:
> I used LiveUSB, I've now tried the Unetbootin and that doesnt work
> either, as comes up with a different error, saying BOOTMGR is
> missing...
>
use dd /iso to /usb/disk method.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_Live_U
I used LiveUSB, I've now tried the Unetbootin and that doesnt work either, as
comes up with a different error, saying BOOTMGR is missing...
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: eoconno...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New Install
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:42:19 -0500
Maybe try downloadin
Maybe try downloading the F20 installer again?...did you use Unetbootin to
get the files on the USB?
- Reply message -
From: "Leo Simmonds"
To: "users@lists.fedoraproject.org"
Subject: New Install
Date: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 11:10 am
Hi, I have v20 on a USB drive and want to install
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 02:40:05 +1030
Leo Simmonds wrote:
Can't mount root filesystem" What now?
>
https://www.happyassassin.net/2014/02/04/more-on-booting-a-practical-fedora-uefi-guide-and-dont-use-universal-usb-stick-writers/
___
Regards
Frank
frankly3d.
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:04 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> List,
>
> I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
> 256 mgs of memory.
>
> I am able to boot from the DVD as well as the netiso CD without
> difficulty, but after picking the first option on the "Welcome
On 05/24/2011 08:04 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
> 256 mgs of memory.
If you go to http://fedoraproject.org/ the minimum requirements include
"at least 512 MB of memory." Sorry.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:04 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> List,
>
> I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
> 256 mgs of memory.
>
> I am able to boot from the DVD as well as the netiso CD without
> difficulty, but after picking the first option on the "Welcome
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 10/23/2010 01:59 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
while the /etc/passwd seems OK
pdupre:x:500:500:Patrick:/home/pdupre:/bin/bash
id:
uid=500(pdupre) gid=500(pdupre) groups=500(pdupre)
context=unconfin
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I just installed on a machine fedora13 and I do face a couple of
small problems. They may be related together.
The NetworkManager does not seem to be running while the service seems
running OK (enabled and running)
I have to do /et
On 10/23/2010 01:59 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
while the /etc/passwd seems OK
>> pdupre:x:500:500:Patrick:/home/pdupre:/bin/bash
>> id:
>> uid=500(pdupre) gid=500(pdupre) groups=500(pdupre)
>> context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed on a machine fedora13 and I do face a couple of
> small problems. They may be related together.
>
> The NetworkManager does not seem to be running while the service seems
> running OK (enabled and running)
> I have
> > There is a process by which people can support other architectures. If
> > enough
> > people that care enough to do the actual work involved with maintaining
> > a secondary architecture work to make it happen, there could be an i586
> > and/or i486 secondary architecture.
> Well, what is invo
On 9/18/2010 2:08 PM, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 09/18/2010 10:39 AM, David Boles wrote:
>> On 9/18/2010 1:14 PM, JD wrote:
>>
>> I would think that Fedora would be more than happy if you performed the
>> work and provided the server(s) and HD space.
>>
>> So when can we expect to see the fruits of your
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:05 PM, JB wrote:
>
> I think Fedora excludes too many users and their machines for no good reason.
> Perhaps Fedora could change arch to i586 and have a bigger base of users and
> testers as a result ? Starting with Fedora 14 ?
>
> Sometimes I think Fedora is getting ah
On 09/18/2010 10:39 AM, David Boles wrote:
> On 9/18/2010 1:14 PM, JD wrote:
>>
>> On 09/18/2010 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +,
>>> JB wrote:
>>> Fedora doesn't have infinite resources. Not doing things to save resources
>>> is a good reason.
>>
On 9/18/2010 1:14 PM, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 09/18/2010 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +,
>>JB wrote:
>> Fedora doesn't have infinite resources. Not doing things to save resources
>> is a good reason.
>>
>> There is a process by which people can support
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:14:50 -0700,
JD wrote:
>
>
> Well, what is involved in building of Fedora for the i386 arch
> other than an automated script that sets the gcc options to
> compile for the i386 architecture?
> Is that really all that much work?
If you don't care that any of it work
On 09/18/2010 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +,
>JB wrote:
>> I think Fedora excludes too many users and their machines for no good reason.
>> Perhaps Fedora could change arch to i586 and have a bigger base of users and
>> testers as a result ? Starti
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +,
JB wrote:
>
> I think Fedora excludes too many users and their machines for no good reason.
> Perhaps Fedora could change arch to i586 and have a bigger base of users and
> testers as a result ? Starting with Fedora 14 ?
Fedora doesn't have infinite reso
On 09/18/2010 09:05 AM, JB wrote:
snip a lot
> Wow ! Who could be behind it ? :-)
> Mr Sherlock Holmes to the rescue ...
>
> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=fedora
snip some more ..
Well, Sherlock JB Holmes,
You gotta know that more often than not,
MONEY TALKS!!
--
users mailing
, September 18, 2010 11:05 AM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: New install
Rod McCown aircanopy.net> writes:
> ...
Hi,
> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
> 13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office that I can get
&
Rod McCown aircanopy.net> writes:
> ...
Hi,
> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
> 13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office that I can get
> 512 MB of RAM on.
> ...
Ys ... :-)
> I just tried on a AMD K6-2 500Mhz machine and it says this
> All released binaries are for the i686 architecture.
The released binaries are not for i686, they are for i686 *plus* some
extensions - one of which happens to be cmov.
Alan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
> While waiting for the (clears throat) definitive answer from this
> list, you might want to try Googling CMOV and pondering what comes up.
> Among other things, I wonder if the problem isn't the way the
> instruction is (or isn't) detected (or, alternately, how CMOV is
> implemented by a particu
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:24:32 -0500
"Rod McCown" wrote:
> Hello all,
> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the
> "Fedora 13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office
> that I can get 512 MB of RAM on. The disk will boot my laptop, but
> unfortunately it is
On 09/17/2010 09:08 PM, Darr wrote:
> On Saturday, 18 September, 2010 @00:51 zulu, JD scribed:
>
>> All released binaries are for the i686 architecture.
> Live spins, yeah... but the OP should be able to install the i386 version
> from DVD or CDs.
>
> e.g.
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/relea
On Saturday, 18 September, 2010 @00:51 zulu, JD scribed:
> All released binaries are for the i686 architecture.
Live spins, yeah... but the OP should be able to install the i386 version
from DVD or CDs.
e.g.
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/13/Fedora/i386/iso/
--
users mailing list
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Rod McCown wrote:
> Hello all,
> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
> 13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office that I can get
> 512 MB of RAM on. The disk will boot my laptop, but unfortunately it is a
> c
On 09/17/2010 05:46 PM, Jonathan Beatty wrote:
> That chip isn't technically i686 and you'll need to use a 386 distro
> with it, as far as I know.
>
> On 9/17/10, Rod McCown wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
>> 13 desktop" on the on
46 matches
Mail list logo
