Re: Networking problem

On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:19 -0700, JD wrote: > On 05/21/11 14:15, Joe Zeff wrote: > > On 05/21/2011 02:00 PM, JD wrote: > >> I can configure sendmail to run with some specific smarthost. > >> That is my main problem. > >> It is that I have no domain name nor a public mx record, > >> and even if I d

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/11 14:15, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/21/2011 02:00 PM, JD wrote: >> I can configure sendmail to run with some specific smarthost. >> That is my main problem. >> It is that I have no domain name nor a public mx record, >> and even if I did, I would have to deal with all the spam :) > So get yo

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/2011 02:00 PM, JD wrote: > I can configure sendmail to run with some specific smarthost. > That is my main problem. > It is that I have no domain name nor a public mx record, > and even if I did, I would have to deal with all the spam :) So get yourself a domain name; it's not that expens

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/11 13:24, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/21/2011 01:05 PM, JD wrote: >> Well, I do not need a mail server. I would have to fight with >> at&t to open up port 25 for me. > No you wouldn't. You'd tell sendmail to use the AT&T mail server as a > smarthost and pass all of your outgoing mail through

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/2011 01:05 PM, JD wrote: > Well, I do not need a mail server. I would have to fight with > at&t to open up port 25 for me. No you wouldn't. You'd tell sendmail to use the AT&T mail server as a smarthost and pass all of your outgoing mail through it. I know, because I have a cron job t

Re: Networking problem

On 05/21/11 12:19, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:06 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/19/11 18:45, Tom H wrote: >>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JDwrote: On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: > To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" > and a "/etc/sysc

Re: Networking problem

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:06 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/19/11 18:45, Tom H wrote: >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JD  wrote: >>> On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" and a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0"

Re: Networking problem

On 05/19/2011 07:06 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/19/11 18:45, Tom H wrote: >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: >> To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" and a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0"? What are th

Re: Networking problem

On 05/19/11 18:45, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: > >>> To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" >>> and a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0"? What are their >>> contents? >> I have no /etc/sysc

Re: Networking problem

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: >> To the OP: Do you have a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0" >> and a "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0"? What are their >> contents? > > I have no  /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0:0 >

Re: Networking problem

On 05/19/11 17:41, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, JB wrote: >> Tom H gmail.com> writes: >>> If you're referring to "192.168.1.254 0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" as "FROM IPv4 >>> address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface" then >>> no. "0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" is the MAC addres

Re: Networking problem

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, JB wrote: > Tom H gmail.com> writes: >> If you're referring to "192.168.1.254 0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" as "FROM IPv4 >> address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface" then >> no. "0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" is the MAC address of "192.168.1.254". > No, I was re

Re: Networking problem

On 05/17/11 04:25, JB wrote: > Tom H gmail.com> writes: > >> ... >>> Let's try a ping from Fedora to Powerbook. >>> >>> snip >>> >>> But, the situation is curious, because we have ping's IPv4-format packet >>> with >>> FROM IPv4 address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface >> I

Re: Networking problem

Tom H gmail.com> writes: > ... > > Let's try a ping from Fedora to Powerbook. > > > > snip > > > > But, the situation is curious, because we have ping's IPv4-format packet > > with > > FROM IPv4 address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface > > If you're referring to "192.168.1

Re: Networking problem

On 05/16/11 23:42, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:35 PM, JB wrote: >> JB gmail.com> writes: >> On Powerbook machine >> >> # /sbin/netstat -rn >> Routing tables >> Internet: >> DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire >> default192.168.1.254

Re: Networking problem

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:35 PM, JB wrote: > JB gmail.com> writes: > On Powerbook machine > > # /sbin/netstat -rn > Routing tables > Internet: > Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire > default            192.168.1.254      UGSc        8        0    en1 > 127

Re: Networking problem

JD gmail.com> writes: > ... On Fedora (192.168.1.108): Give us the outputs: $ cat /etc/sysconfig/network $ ls /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ Any route files e.g. route-wlan0 ? If yes, then: $ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-* You said you had had trouble modifying routing table on Fe

Re: Networking problem

JD gmail.com> writes: > ... - on Fedora machine: start tcpdump on both interfaces wlan0 and wlan0:0, with -w capture.out ping -c 2 192.168.1.70 kill ping if needed kill tcpdump (Ctl-c) What interface the packets was out on ? Did they get out at all ? Show us tpcdump statistics (

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/11 17:35, JB wrote: > JB gmail.com> writes: > >> > M1 > 192.168.1.x/24 > eth? > | > = > | > 192.168.1.254/24 wireless router > ^

Re: Networking problem

JB gmail.com> writes: > M1 192.168.1.x/24 eth? | = | 192.168.1.254/24 wireless router ^^ ^

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/11 10:48, JB wrote: > JD gmail.com> writes: > >> ... > Have you tried this link layer (layer 2) "ping" ? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linkloop/ > > http://linux.die.net/man/1/linkloop > > JB > > It is a broken program. I can ping my router, but when I provide the router's MAC addr

Re: Networking problem

JD gmail.com> writes: > ... Have you tried this link layer (layer 2) "ping" ? http://sourceforge.net/projects/linkloop/ http://linux.die.net/man/1/linkloop JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/11 08:41, sdaw...@donet.com wrote: > Keep in mind that the table shown above from the powerbook doesn't > say it is reporting the Fedora machine. The powerbook is reporting > that it attempted to obtain the MAC address for the host at > 192.168.1.108, but it didn't receive a reply.

Re: Networking problem

Quoting JD : >> Usually, firewalls don't inhibit ARP entries. To test this theory, >> try "ping 192.168.1.70" from your 192.168.1.108 box. Directly after >> that, issue the command "arp -a". If ARP works, you should see >> something like this. >> >> ? (10.1.1.1) at 00:30:ab:13:9e:3d [ether]

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/11 00:13, g wrote: > On 05/15/2011 03:53 AM, JD wrote: > <> > >> It is model 3800HGV-B > 3800HGV-B is what i was looking for. kevin's reply answered for ip address. > > i tried searching '2wire.com' site, but now that 'pace' has bought them out, > all

Re: Networking problem

On Saturday, May 14, 2011 11:45:47 PM JD wrote: ... > Well, that bridge is the router. > Wireless clients that are associated with an Access Point > in "infrastructure" mode cannot directly talk to each other. > Their traffic must flow through the router. > If I had set the two computers to use Ad

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 11:48 -0400, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.60/32 -j ACCEPT > > there needs to be a netmask in the syntax. No there doesn't. That's a rule being set for a specific IP, not a subnet range of addresses. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.

Re: Networking problem

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:39 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 22:02, Shane Dawalt wrote: >> >> Usually, firewalls don't inhibit ARP entries. To test this theory, >> try "ping 192.168.1.70" from your 192.168.1.108 box.  Directly after >> that, issue the command "arp -a".  If ARP works, you should see >>

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 04:40 AM, JD wrote: <> > Sorry! > My bad. not as bad as not trimming 'dead wood' or slipping off to 'html' and breaking thread i am trying to keep up with and learn something. from what i have read in 2701 pdf that i found, still 1 general uverse pdf missing, i do not believe that

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 03:53 AM, JD wrote: <> > It is model 3800HGV-B 3800HGV-B is what i was looking for. kevin's reply answered for ip address. i tried searching '2wire.com' site, but now that 'pace' has bought them out, all info that was available before is now p

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 22:02, Shane Dawalt wrote: > On 05/15/2011 12:45 AM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 21:28, Shane Dawalt wrote: >>> On 05/15/2011 12:18 AM, JD wrote: On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: >>> Can you add a "special" static route between th

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 12:45 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 21:28, Shane Dawalt wrote: >> On 05/15/2011 12:18 AM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: >> Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router >> as the gatewa

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 21:28, Shane Dawalt wrote: > On 05/15/2011 12:18 AM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: > Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router > as the gateway? > > As I recall, LAN traffic a

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Shane Dawalt wrote: > On 05/14/2011 10:59 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > > On 5/14/11 7:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > >> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: > >>> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > > On 05/14/11 18:2

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 12:18 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router as the gateway? As I recall, LAN traffic assumes that anything sent on the local int

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 21:01, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 11:53 PM, JD wrote: >> It is model 3800HGV-B > O, Bad URL 192.168.1.254 is a non-route-able Internet address. > It only works on *your* network > :) That is weird!! When I copied and pa

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 20:59, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: >>> Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router >>> as the gateway? >>> >>> As I recall, LAN traffic assumes that anything sent on the local >>> interface will get directly to anything else

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 10:59 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 7:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >>>

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 20:53, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 8:42 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 19:41, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >>> On 05/14/

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:59 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > I'm suggesting that you either have: > > 192.168.1.108 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0 UG wlan0 Oops, the Genmask above should have been 255.255.255.255 ... my bad. > 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U wlan0 > 0.0.0.0

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:53 PM, JD wrote: > It is model 3800HGV-B O, Bad URL 192.168.1.254 is a non-route-able Internet address. It only works on *your* network -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.frami

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:42 PM, JD wrote: >> Can you add a "special" static route between the 2 specifying the router >> as the gateway? >> >> As I recall, LAN traffic assumes that anything sent on the local >> interface will get directly to anything else on the local network by >> just sending it. I'm no

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 19:09, g wrote: > On 05/15/2011 12:55 AM, JD wrote: > <> > >> Perhaps it is an unpublished feature. >> >> Gues it is time to call the that horrible customer service bureaucracy! > you do not mention which model, therefore a search from here may help; > > http://support.2wire.com/ind

Re: Networking problem

On 5/14/11 8:42 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 19:41, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >>> I also brought t

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 19:59, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 7:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >>> I al

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 19:41, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: >>> On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >> I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried t

Re: Networking problem

On 5/14/11 7:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: >>> On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >> I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 10:09 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: >> On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: > I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora > from Powerbook. No go!! Th

Re: Networking problem

On 05/15/2011 12:55 AM, JD wrote: <> > Perhaps it is an unpublished feature. > > Gues it is time to call the that horrible customer service bureaucracy! you do not mention which model, therefore a search from here may help; http://support.2wire.com/index.php if a 2701; http://support.2wi

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 18:45, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora from Powerbook. No go!! >>> That means that it's not a firewall issue.

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 09:45 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora from Powerbook. No go!! >>> That means that it's not a firewall iss

Re: Networking problem

On 5/14/11 6:40 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >>> I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora >>> from Powerbook. No go!! >> That means that it's not a firewall issue. Check your router config to >> see if it's set t

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 18:24, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: >> I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora >> from Powerbook. No go!! > That means that it's not a firewall issue. Check your router config to > see if it's set to allow pings inside the LAN. Thanx!

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 01:27 PM, JD wrote: > I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to ping Fedora > from Powerbook. No go!! That means that it's not a firewall issue. Check your router config to see if it's set to allow pings inside the LAN. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 16:46, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/14/2011 07:10 PM, Rick Sewill wrote: >> On Saturday, May 14, 2011 03:27:53 PM JD wrote: >> This setup sounds like wifi bridge mode as opposed to wifi ad-hoc mode. >> >> Question: in wifi bridging, does the packet from the Powerbook, >> which is dest

Re: Networking problem

Dear JD, On 14/05/11 06:36 -0700, JD wrote: >On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection >on specific ports from some machines on the LAN. > >However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: > >-A INPUT -s 192.168.1.60 -j ACCEPT The -A means *appen

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:13 PM, JD wrote: > > The eth0 is not active. It is configured with a static IP, but it is > disconnected. > > Ditto on the PowerBook machine. It is configured with a static IP > but is is disconnected, so the ether links on both machines is down. > Only the wireless is ac

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 07:10 PM, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 03:27:53 PM JD wrote: > This setup sounds like wifi bridge mode as opposed to wifi ad-hoc mode. > > Question: in wifi bridging, does the packet from the Powerbook, > which is destined for the Fedora, go through the gateway, >

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 16:10, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 03:27:53 PM JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 12:55, Rick Sewill wrote: >>> On Saturday, May 14, 2011 10:46:51 AM JD wrote: On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 08

Re: Networking problem

On Saturday, May 14, 2011 03:27:53 PM JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 12:55, Rick Sewill wrote: > > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 10:46:51 AM JD wrote: > >> On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: > >>> On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > > On 0

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 04:27 PM, JD wrote: ded the rule > -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j ACCEPT > and retried. > Same thing. > both machines can ping the GW, and they can ping a third machine I have > on the LAN. > But they cannot ping each other. > I also brought the fedora firewall down, and retried to pi

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 12:55, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 10:46:51 AM JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: >>> On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: >> On my F14, I am running

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 12:55, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/14/2011 02:13 PM, JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 12:36, Genes MailLists wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote: >>> .. >>> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:34:56:00:03:43 inet6 addr: fe80::234:56ff:fe00:343/64 Scope:Lin

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 02:13 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 12:36, Genes MailLists wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote: >>> >> >> .. >> >>> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:34:56:00:03:43 >>> inet6 addr: fe80::234:56ff:fe00:343/64 Scope:Link >>> wlan0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWadd

Re: Networking problem

On Saturday, May 14, 2011 10:46:51 AM JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: > > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: > >> On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > >>> On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: > On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connect

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:08 AM, JD wrote: > Thank you Dale. > I can tell you that the counts do not change!! > > I will seek the help of a friend. Before you do you might consider going to the Fedora Forum at http://www.fedorafourm.org and asking in the Security forum. This will give you input from Fed

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 12:36, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote: > >> On Fedora Machine: >> # /bin/netstat -rn >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt >> Iface >> 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 11:49, Dale Dellutri wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:36 AM, JD wrote: >> On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on >> specific ports from some machines on the LAN. >> >> However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: >> >> -A I

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 11:46 AM, JD wrote: > On Fedora Machine: > # /bin/netstat -rn > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt > Iface > 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth0 > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, 14 May 2011 13:49:34 -0500, DD wrote: > 2. iptables problems can be difficult to debug without seeing all the rules, > since the order of the rules is so important. I know you are worried about > security, but you'll need to show them to someone you trust if you can't > solve tis yourself

Re: Networking problem

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:36 AM, JD wrote: > On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on > specific ports from some machines on the LAN. > > However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: > > -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.60 -j ACCEPT > > After restart

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 09:34, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/14/2011 10:49 AM, JD wrote: > >> -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT >> -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT >> >> And no, I cannot ssh even though on the Fedora machine sshd is running on >> both my Fedora and the machine at 192.168.1.60

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 09:17, Rick Sewill wrote: > On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: >> On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: >>> On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on specific ports from some machines on the LAN.

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 10:49 AM, JD wrote: > > -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT > -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT > > And no, I cannot ssh even though on the Fedora machine sshd is running on > both my Fedora and the machine at 192.168.1.60 > > In that case you need to publish all

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 12:17 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > > mum_icmp_type=${#icmp_types[@]} > Typo - above should obviously be: num_icmp_type -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Networking problem

On Saturday, May 14, 2011 09:27:55 AM JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > > On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: > >> On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on > >> specific ports from some machines on the LAN. > >> > >> However, for one machine I mad

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 10:27 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: >>> On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on >>> specific ports from some machines on the LAN. >>> >>> However, for one machine I made a general rule to

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 08:48, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote: > On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: >> On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on >> specific ports from some machines on the LAN. >> >> However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: >> >> -A INPUT -s

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/11 08:16, Pittigher, Raymond - ES wrote: > Where in the chain did you put the rule? > - > > From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of JD [jd1...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 9:36 AM > To: Community support for Fedora us

Re: Networking problem

On 05/14/2011 09:36 AM, JD wrote: > On my F14, I am running a firewall that accepts specific connection on > specific ports from some machines on the LAN. > > However, for one machine I made a general rule to accept all connections: > > -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.60 -j ACCEPT > > After restarting the fi

RE: Networking problem

Where in the chain did you put the rule? - Ray Pittigher Software Development Environment Department --phone 973-284-2275 --email raymond.pittig...@itt.com http://acdnjpvcs/tmtrack/tmtrack.dll for all your SDE Support needs From: users-boun...@lists.fedora