On 07/08/13 22:24, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
> Thank you, that's life saver.
>
> Behind I am, but then so is system-config-nfs because that's what I used
> to configure nfs, including the ports.
I don't use that tool. If it lead you down the garden path, you probably
should write a bugzilla.
>
> Whi
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 13:29:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/08/13 13:09, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
>> I normally have an nfs server running on one of my machines. Now nfs
>> itself and the portmapper start on fixed ports, but the rpc services
>> start on random ports so they need to be assigned fixed
On 07/08/13 13:09, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
> I normally have an nfs server running on one of my machines. Now nfs
> itself and the portmapper start on fixed ports, but the rpc services
> start on random ports so they need to be assigned fixed ports in
> /etc/sysconfig/nfs like so:
>
> LOCKD_TCPPORT=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/22/2011 11:20 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/22/2011 08:43 PM, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>>
>> I didn't get anything running sealert -b. The widget "SELinux
>> Alert Browser" showed no alerts. In /var/log/messages I get this
>> message repeated
On 23 October 2011 23:11, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
> I can ping (and ssh) the server from the client.
> When I restart nfs and nfslock on the server I get this in the
> server /var/log/messages:
> PuteF kernel: [25572.902466] NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the
> NFSv4 state recovery directory
Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>
>> On 10/23/2011 07:24 AM, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>>> I have a small home LAN. I am running FC15 on the server. As I still
>>> have not made a full peace with FC15 I'm still running FC13 on the
>>> client. Several years and FC versions ago, someone on the list told me
>>> abo
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 20:58 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:42:26 -0700
> Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>
> > I get this error message:
> > mount.nfs: Connection timed out
>
> Try restarting the NFS server on the host system and
> then try mounting the filesystem on the client
> again.
On 10/22/2011 08:43 PM, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>
> I didn't get anything running sealert -b. The widget "SELinux Alert
> Browser" showed no alerts. In /var/log/messages I get this message
> repeated at intervals:
> Oct 22 17:37:49 PuteB mount[1460]: mount to NFS server '192.168.1.14'
> failed: Conn
On 10/22/2011 04:42 PM, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
> Is this the right mount command?
> mount -t nfs 192.168.1.14:/home/magnusg/Music /home/magnusg/Music
>
If this partition is listed in /etc/fstab, you should be able to get
away with this:
mount /home/magnusg/Music
or, if you really want to avoid t
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:42:26 -0700
Gerhard Magnus wrote:
> I get this error message:
> mount.nfs: Connection timed out
Try restarting the NFS server on the host system and
then try mounting the filesystem on the client
again. I get the impression that systemd somehow
manages to start servers befo
On 10/22/2011 08:07 PM, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is this the right mount command?
>> mount -t nfs
>> 192.168.1.14:/home/magnusg/Music /home/magnusg/Music
>>
>> I get this error message:
>> mount.nfs: Connection timed out
On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 05:19 +0530, Soham Chakraborty wrote:
> Yes, mount command seems fine to me. What does this command say
>
> mount -t nfs,_netdev
> 192.168.1.14:/home/magnusg/Music /home/magnusg/Music
magnusg@PuteB Sat Oct 22 17:03:07
[1004] ~ $ su -c "mount -t nfs,_netdev
192.168.1.14:/home
Yes, mount command seems fine to me. What does this command say
mount -t nfs,_netdev 192.168.1.14:/home/magnusg/Music /home/magnusg/Music
--Soham
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>
> > On 10/23/2011 07:24 AM, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
> > > I have a small home LAN. I am runnin
> On 10/23/2011 07:24 AM, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
> > I have a small home LAN. I am running FC15 on the server. As I still
> > have not made a full peace with FC15 I'm still running FC13 on the
> > client. Several years and FC versions ago, someone on the list told me
> > about this procedure for se
On 10/23/2011 07:24 AM, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
> I have a small home LAN. I am running FC15 on the server. As I still
> have not made a full peace with FC15 I'm still running FC13 on the
> client. Several years and FC versions ago, someone on the list told me
> about this procedure for setting up NF
no, I haven't seen it and tested it many times.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:36 AM, bruce wrote:
> hey gary...
>
> just wondering. i'm assuming that an nfs_12 client doesn't hang?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, gary artim wrote:
>> Hi All --
>>
>>
>> wondering if anyone has had any proble
hey gary...
just wondering. i'm assuming that an nfs_12 client doesn't hang?
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, gary artim wrote:
> Hi All --
>
>
> wondering if anyone has had any problems with nfs between an
> fc12_nfs_server and fc11_nfs_client? I have a client that periodically
> hangs on doi
17 matches
Mail list logo