Re: Metamail

2010-10-29 Thread JD
On 10/28/2010 10:23 PM, JD wrote: > On 10/28/2010 09:48 PM, Dave Close wrote: >> Ed Greshko wrote: >> Certainly, mailcap is used by programs other than metamail. But the description seems to imply that metamail is the primary user. So, where= is metamail? >>> metamail hasn't

Re: Metamail

2010-10-28 Thread Ed Greshko
> On 10/28/2010 09:48 PM, Dave Close wrote: >> Ed Greshko wrote: >> Certainly, mailcap is used by programs other than metamail. But the description seems to imply that metamail is the primary user. So, where= is metamail? >>> metamail hasn't been packaged in a long timeat least

Re: Metamail

2010-10-28 Thread JD
On 10/28/2010 09:48 PM, Dave Close wrote: > Ed Greshko wrote: > >>> Certainly, mailcap is used by programs other than metamail. But the >>> description seems to imply that metamail is the primary user. So, where= >>> is metamail? >> metamail hasn't been packaged in a long timeat least before

Re: Metamail

2010-10-28 Thread Ed Greshko
> Ed Greshko wrote: > >>> Certainly, mailcap is used by programs other than metamail. But the >>> description seems to imply that metamail is the primary user. So, where= >>> is metamail? >> metamail hasn't been packaged in a long timeat least before F11. It >> is *old* and no longer maintaine

Re: Metamail

2010-10-28 Thread Dave Close
Ed Greshko wrote: >> Certainly, mailcap is used by programs other than metamail. But the >> description seems to imply that metamail is the primary user. So, where= >> is metamail? > >metamail hasn't been packaged in a long timeat least before F11. It >is *old* and no longer maintained by any

Re: Metamail

2010-10-28 Thread Ed Greshko
> Certainly, mailcap is used by programs other than metamail. But the > description seems to imply that metamail is the primary user. So, where > is metamail? metamail hasn't been packaged in a long timeat least before F11. It is *old* and no longer maintained by anyone. -- Be wary of stron