On 11/04/2013 11:28 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> There is no output to /var/log/messages when I plug it in.
>
> On 11/04/2013 07:50:57 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> On 11/03/2013 10:20 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>>> I have a Sony 128MB memory stick. When inserted, Fedora 19 does not
>> recognize
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>
>> I have a Sony 128MB memory stick. When inserted, Fedora 19 does not
>> recognize it -- lsblk does not show it, dmesg reports nothing. It's
>> writable by Windows 7, which reports t
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> I have a Sony 128MB memory stick. When inserted, Fedora 19 does not
> recognize it -- lsblk does not show it, dmesg reports nothing. It's
> writable by Windows 7, which reports the device as "JMCR MS SCSI Disk
> Device"
>
> Any thoughts on h
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:31:43 -0800,
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Sigh! What a bummer. But thanks for the info.
Well, if that works, you could ask the Fedora kernel maintainers about
turning it on. If they know someone is using it and it doesn't cause issues
for others, I expect they'd be like
Sigh! What a bummer. But thanks for the info.
On 11/04/2013 08:18:31 AM, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote:
> On 4 November 2013 01:20, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > Any thoughts on how to access the stick under Fedora?
>
> AFAIU, you need to recompile your kernel in order to get it
>
> http://cateee.
There is no output to /var/log/messages when I plug it in.
On 11/04/2013 07:50:57 AM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> On 11/03/2013 10:20 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > I have a Sony 128MB memory stick. When inserted, Fedora 19 does not
> recognize it -- lsblk does not show it, dmesg reports nothing.
On 4 November 2013 01:20, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> Any thoughts on how to access the stick under Fedora?
AFAIU, you need to recompile your kernel in order to get it
http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/MEMSTICK.html
Using PTP you should be able to read it while pluged-in onto the camera.
Kind rega
On 11/03/2013 10:20 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> I have a Sony 128MB memory stick. When inserted, Fedora 19 does not recognize
> it -- lsblk does not show it, dmesg reports nothing. It's writable by Windows
> 7, which reports the device as "JMCR MS SCSI Disk Device"
>
> Any thoughts on how to acce
On 02/03/2013 02:26 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 12:47 AM, Maseood Raisi wrote:
>> I use xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.12.4-2.fc17.x86_64 with priority Nvidia
>> Driver with KDM-Kwin-KDE ...
>>
>> I don't know which one has memory leak but plasma-desktop and kwin and
>> kdm use normal memory
On 02/03/2013 12:47 AM, Maseood Raisi wrote:
> I use xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.12.4-2.fc17.x86_64 with priority Nvidia
> Driver with KDM-Kwin-KDE ...
>
> I don't know which one has memory leak but plasma-desktop and kwin and
> kdm use normal memory (I mean after working for some days with my
> system
2012/7/16 jdow :
> On 2012/07/16 04:55, Paweł Brodacki wrote:
>>
>> In short: Works as designed. You may try to disable devices you do not
>> use to salvage some address space, but you won't reach 4096 MB
>> available.
>
>
> This is well known issue. The missing space is occupied by the page table
> What is the real difference between i386 and x86?
i386 is an Intel brand, x86 is a term folks use generically for those
32bit processors.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Gu
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > This is well known issue. The missing space is occupied by the page table
> > index. When pages are 4k in size you need a lot of table entries to
> describe
> > a full 4 gigabytes, like a million of them. Linux seems to have optimized
> > this
> This is well known issue. The missing space is occupied by the page table
> index. When pages are 4k in size you need a lot of table entries to describe
> a full 4 gigabytes, like a million of them. Linux seems to have optimized
> this a little. Windows loses a bit more memory, if I recall correc
On 2012/07/16 04:55, Paweł Brodacki wrote:
2012/7/16 Martín Marqués :
I had a problem with my main board and CPU and had to buy a new one.
Also memory, as the old computer had DDR2 memory.
Th problem is that I see only 3.5Gb of memory, while I had a 4Gb bank
put in the Motherboard (the motherbo
2012/7/16 Martín Marqués :
> 2012/7/16 Paweł Brodacki :
>> 2012/7/16 Martín Marqués :
>>> I had a problem with my main board and CPU and had to buy a new one.
>>> Also memory, as the old computer had DDR2 memory.
>>>
>>> Th problem is that I see only 3.5Gb of memory, while I had a 4Gb bank
>>> put
2012/7/16 Paweł Brodacki :
> 2012/7/16 Martín Marqués :
>> I had a problem with my main board and CPU and had to buy a new one.
>> Also memory, as the old computer had DDR2 memory.
>>
>> Th problem is that I see only 3.5Gb of memory, while I had a 4Gb bank
>> put in the Motherboard (the motherboard
2012/7/15 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 16.07.2012 02:14, schrieb Martín Marqués:
>> I had a problem with my main board and CPU and had to buy a new one.
>> Also memory, as the old computer had DDR2 memory.
>>
>> Th problem is that I see only 3.5Gb of memory, while I had a 4Gb bank
>> put in the Motherb
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:16:01 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.07.2012 02:14, schrieb Martín Marqués:
> > I had a problem with my main board and CPU and had to buy a new one.
> > Also memory, as the old computer had DDR2 memory.
> >
> > Th problem is that I see only 3.5Gb of memory, while
On 07/16/2012 11:28 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
are you sure? I have the same problem with an ASROCK board (Conroe
DVI/H): 4 GB mem installed (2x2GB bars), and only 3.34 G available.
And: I'm running *F17/x86_64*.
> 32bit OS is bad for modern computers
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
I don'
On 07/16/2012 02:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.07.2012 02:14, schrieb Martín Marqués:
I had a problem with my main board and CPU and had to buy a new one.
Also memory, as the old computer had DDR2 memory.
Th problem is that I see only 3.5Gb of memory, while I had a 4Gb bank
put in the Mot
Am 16.07.2012 02:14, schrieb Martín Marqués:
> I had a problem with my main board and CPU and had to buy a new one.
> Also memory, as the old computer had DDR2 memory.
>
> Th problem is that I see only 3.5Gb of memory, while I had a 4Gb bank
> put in the Motherboard (the motherboard says it can
2012/7/16 Martín Marqués :
> I had a problem with my main board and CPU and had to buy a new one.
> Also memory, as the old computer had DDR2 memory.
>
> Th problem is that I see only 3.5Gb of memory, while I had a 4Gb bank
> put in the Motherboard (the motherboard says it can handle up to 32Gb
> o
On 07/15/2012 07:14 PM, Martín Marqués wrote:
I had a problem with my main board and CPU and had to buy a new one.
Also memory, as the old computer had DDR2 memory.
Th problem is that I see only 3.5Gb of memory, while I had a 4Gb bank
put in the Motherboard (the motherboard says it can handle up
On 06/29/2012 04:45 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
Hello All,
I was just wondering if anyone knew of a program, or command that give
you a "scan" of your memory running on your system? Preferably, it
should also give you stats as to what KIND of memory you have, the
AMOUNT of memory, and the M
Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I pise:
> I was just wondering if anyone knew of a program, or command that
> give you a "scan" of your memory running on your system? Preferably,
> it should also give you stats as to what KIND of memory you have,
> the AMOUNT of memory, and the MAX capacity that your machine c
cat /proc/meminfo
suomi
On 06/29/2012 10:45 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
Hello All,
I was just wondering if anyone knew of a program, or command that give
you a "scan" of your memory running on your system? Preferably, it
should also give you stats as to what KIND of memory you have, the
A
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:45:40 -0400
"Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I" wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I was just wondering if anyone knew of a program, or command that give
> you a "scan" of your memory running on your system? Preferably, it
> should also give you stats as to what KIND of memory you have, the
>
On 04/27/2012 10:02 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Rick Stevens said:
You might try having a look at the output of ipcs after stopping MySQL
and see if your missing memory is in one or more of the shm segments.
If so, you can reclaim it by using "ipcrm -m". You'd be
surprised at how m
Once upon a time, Rick Stevens said:
> You might try having a look at the output of ipcs after stopping MySQL
> and see if your missing memory is in one or more of the shm segments.
> If so, you can reclaim it by using "ipcrm -m ". You'd be
> surprised at how many programs don't release IPC resour
On 04/27/2012 03:52 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 04/27/2012 02:10 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
Hi all,
I have a strange recurring problem on some of my servers, maybe someone
can help me figure out what might be causing it.
After running a MySQL machine with fairly high load for a while
(~month),
On 04/27/2012 02:10 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
Hi all,
I have a strange recurring problem on some of my servers, maybe someone
can help me figure out what might be causing it.
After running a MySQL machine with fairly high load for a while
(~month), RAM usage in top stops making sense. Normall
On 19.03.2012, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Maybe others have had different experiences, but if
> not, this may point to some possibilities?
3.2.10, .11 and .12 vanilla work(ed) fine here. I guess this problem
is related to a Fedora patch?!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:22:44 -0500 Bruno Wolff III
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 20:18:34 -0500,
>Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> >So here is the problem: I hibernate (this is what causes it to happen
> >most frequently). Sometimes it comes back just fine, other times
> >especially after the s
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 20:18:34 -0500,
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
So here is the problem: I hibernate (this is what causes it to happen
most frequently). Sometimes it comes back just fine, other times
especially after the second time, I get a bunch of layman gibberish
(basically memory address vio
I suggest you try the LXDE spin of Fedora 15. That is, if it´s OK for
you to use LXDE instead of the more resource-hungry Gnome 3 or KDE
4...
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/lxde/
FC
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 18:18, luis redondo wrote:
> I run Fedora13 i386 on my netbook 1GB RAM.I regularly use Vi
On 07/24/2010 12:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday, July 24, 2010 12:19:15 pm binary...@comcast.net did opine:
>
>>FC13
>>
>> Memory terms ??
>>
>> I have a kit of 2 boards 2gb PC2 (2x1gb) , does that mean that the 2
>> boards are a total of 2gb with both boards installed ?
> Generall
On Saturday, July 24, 2010 12:19:15 pm binary...@comcast.net did opine:
> FC13
>
> Memory terms ??
>
> I have a kit of 2 boards 2gb PC2 (2x1gb) , does that mean that the 2
> boards are a total of 2gb with both boards installed ?
Generally yes, buit check with the motherboard manual to see wh
38 matches
Mail list logo
