Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-03 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:29:49PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > That's a good idea, I think it represents a minimal effort to ask, and would > be > a start. But I think the GNOME2 stack is desirable, there's a lot of stuff > depending on that mindset. Not sure why you bring up GNOME 2 to me, t

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-03 Thread Bill Davidsen
Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:49:30PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for >> GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be >> available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 b

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-02 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:49:30PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for > GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be > available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 become a holy war. Sugg

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-02 Thread Frank Murphy
On 01/12/11 19:49, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for > GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be > available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 become a holy war. I don't believe the Fedora ma

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-01 Thread Genes MailLists
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> What did I say which in any way referenced RHEL7? We are running Fedora on >> our >> support machines (not the servers) and my question was pretty specific as to >> FC17 being the issue, so we can get off FC14. > Seems you have some c

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-01 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > What did I say which in any way referenced RHEL7? We are running Fedora on our > support machines (not the servers) and my question was pretty specific as to > FC17 being the issue, so we can get off FC14. Sorry, I thought you were talking ab

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-01 Thread Bill Davidsen
T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for >> GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be >> available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 bec

Re: GNOME2 support revisited

2011-12-01 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Now that MINT has both a GNOME2 port and ax extension (plugin, whatever) for > GNOME3 to make it usable without user retraining, will these features be > available in Fedora17, or has the move to kill GNOME2 become a holy war. There is nothi