Hi,
No, any tricks I have to do to get the two working well with each
other? As I said last time I tried it I needed to get two files which
were in svn and even then I never got it going.
I'll take sshd although you can substitute smtp as an example, ports
22 or 25, port knocking bots I want them
Works fine here. Any concern getting it up and running?
> Am 03.01.2015 um 17:47 schrieb David Mehler :
>
> Hello,
>
> Last time I tried this combination it was either f19 or f20 I was
> unable to get it to work as firewalld was new. On f21 is anyone using
> firewalld to manage their firewall
On 02/24/14 07:05, David Mehler wrote:
> Second question, in my previous setup I used fail2ban to block ip
> addresses that were brute forcing the system. I'm wondering if
> fail2ban and firewalld can work together? Googling showed it was
> possible with an action.d file, but the site referenced re
On 02/24/14 07:05, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use to use iptables on fc17, now with firewalld in fc20 I'm
> migrating to it. I have to say I like it better, there are things I'm
> curious if it can do.
>
> For example, if you allow in http does that work for ipv4, ipv6, or both?
Even with
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:43:14PM +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> Firewalld is a firewall - it only inspects packets and can do some basic
> processing of ip traffic like blocking by port. Firewalld doesn't
Getting into sementics a little bit, but: firewalld doesn't actually do
those things.
On 19.12.2012 15:14, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I use fail2ban to stop ssh intrusions but was curious about firewalld.
> I can't find any information yet, but does anyone know if fail2ban
> works with firewalld? Or does some feature of of firewalld make
> fail2ban unnecessary?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
I h
