As for alternative terminals, rxvt-unicode-256color (actual name of the
package) is a nice starting point (you can customize it via ~/.Xdefaults).
Another good alternative and more close to what I think you are used to is
lxterminal, the terminal emulator from Xfce.
Then you have Konsole (KDE's ter
On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 10:17 -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
> Well, I'm still trying to figure out how I can run a command to get a
> command line from the command line when I don't have a command line.
> Yes, I spent all night coming up with that :).
;-\
With some desktops ALT+F2 pops up a dialog box t
>
>> On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:03 -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Can you point me to where one of these other terminals is? The only
>>> reason I can still use one or make more is because there were some
>>> already opened before I ran the update.
>>
>> Often, one can type "term" in a command line,
> On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:03 -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
>
>> Can you point me to where one of these other terminals is? The only
>> reason I can still use one or make more is because there were some
>> already opened before I ran the update.
>
> Often, one can type "term" in a command line, and get
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:03 -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
> I have been running Fedora 14 since it came out and have never
> installed an update (well, okay, I manually installed the Shellshock
> patch and do run my own custom kernel). I'm still waiting for an
> intrusion or something to go wrong. I am b
On 02/27/15 11:09, Jim Lewis wrote:
>> On 02/27/15 09:03, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>> Since I fully expect to have no terminals when I finally reboot I have
>>> opened Bug 1196472 for this issue. They have already begun to look at
>>> the problem.
>> FWIW, at times I've experienced "weird" things after
> On 02/27/15 09:03, Jim Lewis wrote:
>> Since I fully expect to have no terminals when I finally reboot I have
>> opened Bug 1196472 for this issue. They have already begun to look at
>> the problem.
>
> FWIW, at times I've experienced "weird" things after updates. The latest
> one was segfaul
On 02/27/15 09:03, Jim Lewis wrote:
> Since I fully expect to have no terminals when I finally reboot I have
> opened Bug 1196472 for this issue. They have already begun to look at
> the problem.
FWIW, at times I've experienced "weird" things after updates. The latest one
was segfaults in ibus
> Tim:
>>> I can't say that I have that experience, it's very rare that an update
>>> breaks something on my system. Sounds like you have something wrong
>>> with your system, more than Fedora in general.
>
> Jim Lewis:
>> What does "very rare" mean? So it has happened to you on occasion?
>
> Way
Tim:
>> I can't say that I have that experience, it's very rare that an update
>> breaks something on my system. Sounds like you have something wrong
>> with your system, more than Fedora in general.
Jim Lewis:
> What does "very rare" mean? So it has happened to you on occasion?
Way back on Fedo
> On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 12:49 -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
>> I ran "yum update" on my Fedora 20 system a few days ago. I normally
>> don't do this as something always breaks and in this case it was the
>> Mate-Terminal.
>
> I can't say that I have that experience, it's very rare that an update
> break
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 12:49 -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
> I ran "yum update" on my Fedora 20 system a few days ago. I normally
> don't do this as something always breaks and in this case it was the
> Mate-Terminal.
I can't say that I have that experience, it's very rare that an update
breaks something
12 matches
Mail list logo
