On 07/12/2012 04:14 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/10/2012 11:43 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Do you have any information on this problem? What did you try to solve
it?
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769747 for details. Note
that
Am 13.07.2012 01:58, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 07/12/2012 04:14 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>> On 07/10/2012 11:43 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Do you have any information on this problem? What did you try to solve
it?
>>>
>>>
>>> See https
On 07/12/2012 04:14 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/10/2012 11:43 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Do you have any information on this problem? What did you try to solve
it?
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769747 for details. Note
that
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 11:43 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>>
>> Do you have any information on this problem? What did you try to solve
>> it?
>
>
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769747 for details. Note
> that I'm not the original reporter, an
On 07/10/2012 02:31 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/10/2012 02:33 PM, Edward M wrote:
just a suggestion:-)
this thread appears is getting hijacked, may want to start your own
thread.
Actually, I only mentioned it as an example of needing a backup kernel.
--
sorry, I misunderstood. but
On 07/10/2012 02:33 PM, Edward M wrote:
just a suggestion:-)
this thread appears is getting hijacked, may want to start your own
thread.
Actually, I only mentioned it as an example of needing a backup kernel.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 07/10/2012 02:15 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/10/2012 01:56 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
I think you should compile a completely fresh 3.4.4. from kernel.org
and report this onlinux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, if the problem
persists. You could use the Fedora .config from /boot as a starting
point, if you
On 07/10/2012 01:56 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
I think you should compile a completely fresh 3.4.4. from kernel.org
and report this onlinux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, if the problem
persists. You could use the Fedora .config from /boot as a starting
point, if you're not used to compile your own kernels.
On 10.07.2012, Joe Zeff wrote:
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769747 for details. Note
> that I'm not the original reporter, and I seem to be the only one who can't
> boot because of it.
I think you should compile a completely fresh 3.4.4. from kernel.org
and report this on li
On 07/10/2012 11:43 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
Do you have any information on this problem? What did you try to solve
it?
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769747 for details.
Note that I'm not the original reporter, and I seem to be the only one
who can't boot because of it. I rep
On 10.07.2012, Joe Zeff wrote:
> My laptop is running F17 with a kernel from F14 because every F16 kernel
> I've tried on it fails to boot with the exact same problem.
Do you have any information on this problem? What did you try to solve
it?
So far, I've never used any Fedora-kernel longer th
On 10.07.2012 20:00, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 02:15 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> Thanks, a lot. But now one thing bothers me even more. Is it possible
>> that broken kernel which won't boot or cause any other serious problems
>> is released in Fedora 16 or 17? I know that in Rawhide s
On 07/10/2012 02:15 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Thanks, a lot. But now one thing bothers me even more. Is it possible
that broken kernel which won't boot or cause any other serious problems
is released in Fedora 16 or 17? I know that in Rawhide something might
go wrong, but in 16, 17?
My l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 07:23 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>
> Of course, there's rarely any harm in skipping the last step and not
> removing the kernel until later. This was back in the days of manual
> updates with rpm -i/F but it carries over to yum equally w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 02:31 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 10.07.2012 11:26, Dave Cross wrote:
>> On 10 July 2012 10:15, Mateusz Marzantowicz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible that broken kernel which won't boot or cause any
>>> other serious problems is
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
wrote:
> Maybe having two kernels installed is more comfortable, you'll never
> know when something breaks. I must reconsider my initial idea. Thanks a
> lot for any thoughts.
The boot images are about 20-30 MBs each, so I keep 5.
--
Suvayu
On 10.07.2012 11:26, Dave Cross wrote:
> On 10 July 2012 10:15, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>
>> Is it possible
>> that broken kernel which won't boot or cause any other serious problems
>> is released in Fedora 16 or 17? I know that in Rawhide something might
>> go wrong, but in 16, 17?
> It's ha
On 10 July 2012 10:15, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> Is it possible
> that broken kernel which won't boot or cause any other serious problems
> is released in Fedora 16 or 17? I know that in Rawhide something might
> go wrong, but in 16, 17?
It's happened to me more often than I'd like. Probably
On 10 July 2012 10:15, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 10.07.2012 09:47, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 10 July 2012 08:33, Mateusz Marzantowicz
>> wrote:
>>> How can I reduce the number of installed kernels to only one on my
>>> Fedora 17 systems? I'm asking about automated approach without the need
On 10.07.2012 09:47, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 10 July 2012 08:33, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> How can I reduce the number of installed kernels to only one on my
>> Fedora 17 systems? I'm asking about automated approach without the need
>> of manual package removal.
>>
>> I haven't compiled new ke
On 10 July 2012 08:33, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> How can I reduce the number of installed kernels to only one on my
> Fedora 17 systems? I'm asking about automated approach without the need
> of manual package removal.
>
> I haven't compiled new kernels myself for a very long time so I don't
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
