Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

Here is an image of the console when it stops booting. https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/2lIvcIc9OsOgSAK0_VhtrFve0uk252X7hjsY_3ZXvi8?feat=directlink I have posted this issue to the test mailing list as well. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:08 AM, linux guy wrote: > THE nvidia driver I speak of is

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

THE nvidia driver I speak of is 352-41. Here is a copy and paste of the supported hardware list for that version of the driver. Both the GT555M and the GT635M are in the list. Source: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/90279/en-us *GeForce 900 Series:* GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeFor

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

On 06/10/15 15:32, linux guy wrote: lspci says my laptop has an NVIDIA GF116M [GeForce GT 555M/635M] rev a1 http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-555m/features My laptop is only a few years old. Seems funny the video card wouldn't be supported by the nvidia driver. There's

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

This page says that the GT555M is supported in the latest nvidia drivers. (See the supported products tab.) http://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/90279/en-us On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:32 AM, linux guy wrote: > lspci says my laptop has an NVIDIA GF116M [GeForce GT 555M/635M] rev a1 > >

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

lspci says my laptop has an NVIDIA GF116M [GeForce GT 555M/635M] rev a1 http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-555m/features My laptop is only a few years old. Seems funny the video card wouldn't be supported by the nvidia driver. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Ed Greshko wr

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

On 10/06/2015 06:23 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > linux guy wrote: > >> What kernel/ nvidia driver combination is working for people right now ? >> Is there a kmod package that is working with the current kernels ? > Is the nvidia driver likely to be better than nouveau? > > Incidentally, where do yo

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

Timothy Murphy: >> Where is the "test mailing list"? >> According to >> the "test" list is "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora >> releases". Patrick O'Callaghan: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test Hmm, looks like t

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:19 +1030, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 05 October 2015, linux guy sent: > > Another question... is there a better repository than > > rpmfusion-rawhide for getting akmod-f23 from ? > > There's certainly a better place to ask: On the test mailing list. > That's whe

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:29 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Tim wrote: > > > There's certainly a better place to ask: On the test mailing list. > > That's where the people testing out the not-the-current-release are > > conversing. That's where the appropriate experience is, and > > probably > >

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

Tim wrote: > There's certainly a better place to ask: On the test mailing list. > That's where the people testing out the not-the-current-release are > conversing. That's where the appropriate experience is, and probably > the most useful advice, as well. Where is the "test mailing list"? Accor

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

linux guy wrote: > What kernel/ nvidia driver combination is working for people right now ? > Is there a kmod package that is working with the current kernels ? Is the nvidia driver likely to be better than nouveau? Incidentally, where do you find nvidia drivers? I can't find one for my chip, NV

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

Allegedly, on or about 05 October 2015, linux guy sent: > Another question... is there a better repository than > rpmfusion-rawhide for getting akmod-f23 from ? There's certainly a better place to ask: On the test mailing list. That's where the people testing out the not-the-current-release are

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

Another question... is there a better repository than rpmfusion-rawhide for getting akmod-f23 from ? On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:45 PM, linux guy wrote: > FWIW, on my computer (F23) dnf is showing kernels 4.2.1-300 and > 4.2.2-300. I don't have 4.1.7 installed or available. > > The log file in /

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

FWIW, on my computer (F23) dnf is showing kernels 4.2.1-300 and 4.2.2-300. I don't have 4.1.7 installed or available. The log file in /var/cache/akmods/nvidia/ says that nvidia 346.72-2.1 for kernel 4.2.2-300 was verified and installed correctly, without errors. So I should have a working and i

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

I've got another thing that is bothering me. When I boot, grub isn't displaying all the kernels I have installed. It is only showing me "Fedora" and something else. How do I get grub to display the available kernels ? On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:35 PM, linux guy wrote: > What kernel/ nvidia dr

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

What kernel/ nvidia driver combination is working for people right now ? Is there a kmod package that is working with the current kernels ? On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 21:10 -0600, linux guy wrote: > > I uninstalled nouveau. Didn't know I

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 21:10 -0600, linux guy wrote: > I uninstalled nouveau. Didn't know I had to go so far as to black > list it. > > Where does one do that in F23 ? If it's different from F22, better ask on the Test list. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

I uninstalled nouveau. Didn't know I had to go so far as to black list it. Where does one do that in F23 ? On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Joshua Doll wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:35 PM linux guy wrote: > >> I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary software. >> >> Neither F22 nor

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

I bet this is my problem. I'll check tomorrow and report back. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 14:50 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:35:04PM -0600, linux guy wrote: > > >I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary s

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

I'm using akmod. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:55 PM, birger wrote: > How did you install the nvidia drivers? Manually or did you use the > rpmfusion packages. For rpmfusion, did you use kmod-nvidia or akmod-nvidia? > > I have a few systems running akmod-nvidia-304xx, and have no problems. > > linux

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 14:50 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:35:04PM -0600, linux guy wrote: > >I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary software. > >Neither F22 nor F23 will boot on my laptop with kernels from the > > last > >week or so and the latest nvidia dr

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:35 PM linux guy wrote: > I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary software. > > Neither F22 nor F23 will boot on my laptop with kernels from the last week > or so and the latest nvidia driver. When I attempt these kernel/driver > combinations, it stops on the console

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

How did you install the nvidia drivers? Manually or did you use the rpmfusion packages. For rpmfusion, did you use kmod-nvidia or akmod-nvidia? I have a few systems running akmod-nvidia-304xx, and have no problems. linux guy : >I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary software. > >Neither F

Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:35:04PM -0600, linux guy wrote: >I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary software. >Neither F22 nor F23 will boot on my laptop with kernels from the last >week or so and the latest nvidia driver. When I attempt these >kernel/driver combinations, it