On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, James Mckenzie wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply. As I mentioned in my original post, I was
>> primarily ranting against Adobe there. :-)
>>
> Rather than rant against Adobe, rant against the web designers that
> don't use standard files because they are LAZY and 'don't know
Joe Klemmer wrote:
>
>Thanks for the reply. As I mentioned in my original post, I was
>primarily ranting against Adobe there. :-)
>
Rather than rant against Adobe, rant against the web designers that don't use
standard files because they are LAZY and 'don't know how to do it that way'.
Of cou
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:25 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Where did you get a 64bit plugin? There are separate 32 and 64 bit
> compiles of previous versions, did Adobe finally give us a 64 or can
> Firefox somehow run the 32 bit object?
I'm pretty sure all he's doing is linking the 32-bit plugin
Christoph A. wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 06:03 AM, Joe Klemmer wrote:
>> Upon upgrading to flash-plugin-10.1.82.76 flash movies no longer play.
>> I get either nothing or a black box. Regular flash components don't
>> work either.
>>
>> I know we're using flash at our own risk but, until everything mov
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:53 +0200, Christoph A. wrote:
> you might want to have a look at my thread "flash-plugin-10.1.82.76
> not working within SELinux sandbox" although you do not have problems
> relating SELinux.
I read that thread, Christoph. I had searched the list for the plugin
before po
On 08/12/2010 06:03 AM, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> Upon upgrading to flash-plugin-10.1.82.76 flash movies no longer play.
> I get either nothing or a black box. Regular flash components don't
> work either.
>
> I know we're using flash at our own risk but, until everything moves to
> whateverthenextlat
