JD wrote:
> Actually, it is impossible to secure wireless. That's because the
> publicly available crypto systems being used were deliberately
> designed to be broken in real time by parties with very keen
> interest in such ability. The how of such methods of course remain
> in the sole domain of
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday, August 15, 2010 04:19:59 James McKenzie wrote:
>
>> JD wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, it is impossible to secure wireless. That's because the
>>> publicly available crypto systems being used were deliberately
>>> designed to be broken in real time by parties wit
On Sunday, August 15, 2010 04:19:59 James McKenzie wrote:
> JD wrote:
> > Actually, it is impossible to secure wireless. That's because the
> > publicly available crypto systems being used were deliberately
> > designed to be broken in real time by parties with very keen
> > interest in such abilit
On 08/14/2010 08:19 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> JD wrote:
>>On 08/14/2010 07:43 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
>>
>>> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>>>
Bill Davidsen writes:
> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>
>
>> Bob Goodwin writes:
>>
>>
>>> Yes
JD wrote:
> On 08/14/2010 07:43 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
>
>> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>>
>>> Bill Davidsen writes:
>>>
>>>
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>
>
>> Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I
On 08/14/2010 07:43 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>> Bill Davidsen writes:
>>
>>> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>>>
Bob Goodwin writes:
> Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I have one old device that can
> do no more than that, and I usuall
On 08/14/2010 07:38 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Goodwin writes:
>>>
Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I have one old device that can
do no more than that, and I usually admit only certain [18 or 19]
M
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bill Davidsen writes:
>
>> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Goodwin writes:
>>>
Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I have one old device that can
do no more than that, and I usually admit only certain [18 or 19]
MAC
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>
>> Bob Goodwin writes:
>>
>>> Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I have one old device that can
>>> do no more than that, and I usually admit only certain [18 or 19]
>>> MAC addresses that I have listed. Add to that the fac
On 08/14/2010 01:58 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 11:38 -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>> Well, WEP will keep out the casual person looking for an open wifi.
>> To be honest, I think that is good enough unless you have a bored and
>> highly talented kid living next door.
>
> I don't
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 11:38 -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Well, WEP will keep out the casual person looking for an open wifi.
> To be honest, I think that is good enough unless you have a bored and
> highly talented kid living next door.
I don't think it really takes a talented person, the
Bill Davidsen writes:
> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>> Bob Goodwin writes:
>>> Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I have one old device that can
>>> do no more than that, and I usually admit only certain [18 or 19]
>>> MAC addresses that I have listed. Add to that the fact that I a
On 08/13/2010 05:36 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>> Bob Goodwin writes:
>>> Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I have one old device that can
>>> do no more than that, and I usually admit only certain [18 or 19]
>>> MAC addresses that I have listed. Add to t
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>> Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I have one old device that can
>> do no more than that, and I usually admit only certain [18 or 19]
>> MAC addresses that I have listed. Add to that the fact that I am in
>> a rural area surro
On 08/10/2010 10:19 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>On 09/08/10 16:43, Phil Meyer wrote:
>> I am now convinced that ethernet over power has reached an adequate
>> cost/service ratio, and are the best way to go.
>>
>> Powerline networks are up to 200Mb commonly, and you can get a starter
>> kit with t
On 09/08/10 16:43, Phil Meyer wrote:
>
> I am now convinced that ethernet over power has reached an adequate
> cost/service ratio, and are the best way to go.
>
> Powerline networks are up to 200Mb commonly, and you can get a starter
> kit with two or three, depending on brand and model, for abou
Bob Goodwin writes:
> Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I have one old device that can
> do no more than that, and I usually admit only certain [18 or 19]
> MAC addresses that I have listed. Add to that the fact that I am in
> a rural area surrounded by cotton and soy beans, the
On 08/08/10 22:37, James McKenzie wrote:
>
> Just make sure that you apply all of the known good practices for using
> Wireless to these routers since they have much greater transmission
> distances.
>
> James McKenzie
> SSCP 367830
Yes I have been running WEP 'cause I have one old device t
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>
>> Darn, I was hoping you had some experience upon which to recommend
>> them! Yes, I googled and tried some of the places Ed suggested. It
>> looks like there's a whole different WIFI industry out there apart
>> from the prod
Bob Goodwin writes:
> Darn, I was hoping you had some experience upon which to recommend
> them! Yes, I googled and tried some of the places Ed suggested. It
> looks like there's a whole different WIFI industry out there apart
> from the product names we usually see in the compute
On 08/08/2010 12:26 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> So now I'm looking for another router and maybe I don't need 5 gHz despite
> what the ad people would have me believe. In the mean time I will put the old
> Netgear WGR614v9 back in operation. I have several Netgear devices and have
> been satisfi
On 08/08/10 14:18, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>>> department store router prices. see http://www.ubnt.com/ I have one of
>>> their 300mw PCI cards and a now discontinued 300mW AP card.
>>>
>> Where do you buy this "Ubiquiti" stuff?
>>
>> Their site shows some i
Bob Goodwin writes:
>> department store router prices. see http://www.ubnt.com/ I have one of
>> their 300mw PCI cards and a now discontinued 300mW AP card.
>>
> Where do you buy this "Ubiquiti" stuff?
>
> Their site shows some interesting equipment but after wading around
> a bit I
On 08/08/2010 08:41 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Newegg search "Ubiquiti" turns up nothing?
FWIW, Amazon carries some of their products.
--
Fast ship? You mean you've never heard of the Millennium Falcon? -- Han
Solo 葛斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
user
On 08/08/2010 08:41 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> Where do you buy this "Ubiquiti" stuff?
>
> Their site shows some interesting equipment but after wading around
> a bit I find nothing about price or ordering. Perhaps I missed
> "clicking" somewhere? Newegg search "Ubiquiti" turns up
On 08/08/10 06:10, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>> This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
>> have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N, essentially an
>> Ethernet wireless adapter to access the system. I recently bought
On 08/07/2010 12:32 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> And the newer devices have "internal" antennas, no connector to even
> try a gain antenna of any kind. Just try different orientations for
> best signal strength. I do have a camera feeding another Buffalo
> ethernet adapter, 2.4 gH
On 07/08/10 14:50, JD wrote:
>On 08/07/2010 11:07 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
>> have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N, essentially an
>> Ethernet wireless adapter to access the system. I recent
28 matches
Mail list logo
