On 04/21/13 22:30, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> Thanks, for all suggestions. I'll choose subjects and terms more
> precisely next time. Sorry for all your inconvenience and I hope you're
> not going to blacklist my next messages.
No But I may decide to blacklist others for being overly pedan
On 21.04.2013 02:16, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> The fact that you continue to deny a poor choice of subject rather
> than just make a note to be very clear in future subjects makes me
> sorry I spent time composing two answers, one to your subject and one
> to your real problem.
>
> Reindl tends to be
Am 21.04.2013 03:23, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 04/20/2013 05:05 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing
regular system update (or at last, I'm trying)
Am 21.04.2013 01:46, schrieb Bill Davidsen:
> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> I can't cleanly upgrade my Fedora installation (I use --skip-broken),
>> below is error reported by yum:
>>
> You have gained wisdom, the fc17->fc18 upgrade path(s) are not robust.
> Sometime f'ed-up will work,
and if
On 04/20/2013 05:05 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing
regular system update (or at last, I'm trying)
* so please do NOT use the term "upgrade"
Update would be
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 19.04.2013 10:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.04.2013 08:24, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 18.04.2013 23:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing
regular sy
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing
regular system update (or at last, I'm trying)
* so please do NOT use the term "upgrade"
Update would be easier to understand here
* do not use "--s
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
I can't cleanly upgrade my Fedora installation (I use --skip-broken),
below is error reported by yum:
You have gained wisdom, the fc17->fc18 upgrade path(s) are not robust. Sometime
f'ed-up will work, sometimes yum will work, always fresh install will work.
NOTE: b
2013-04-19 10:15 keltezéssel, Reindl Harald írta:
Am 19.04.2013 08:24, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 18.04.2013 23:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing
regular system update (or at la
Am 19.04.2013 10:50, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
> I don't like arguments about terms.
and i don't like discussions about clear subjects
like "yum does not solve dependencies" instead
"can't upgrade" while it is pretty clear that
such dep-problems in case of a normal update
are going away as t
On 19.04.2013 10:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 19.04.2013 08:24, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
>> On 18.04.2013 23:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing
regular system update (o
Am 19.04.2013 08:24, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
> On 18.04.2013 23:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
>>> No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing
>>> regular system update (or at last, I'm trying)
>> * so please do NOT
On 18.04.2013 23:22, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:41:06 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>
>> I can't cleanly upgrade my Fedora installation (I use --skip-broken),
>> below is error reported by yum:
>>
>> Resolving Dependencies
>> --> Running transaction check
>> ---> Package
On 18.04.2013 23:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
>> No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing
>> regular system update (or at last, I'm trying)
> * so please do NOT use the term "upgrade"
Why? Yum uses this term.
> * do not
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:41:06 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> I can't cleanly upgrade my Fedora installation (I use --skip-broken),
> below is error reported by yum:
>
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package febootstrap-supermin-helper.x86_64 0:3.20-1.fc17 will
Am 18.04.2013 23:08, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
> No, because I don't want to upgrade from f17 to f18. I'm just doing
> regular system update (or at last, I'm trying)
* so please do NOT use the term "upgrade"
* do not use "--skip-broken"
* analyze what deps are failing
* consider to wait a fe
On 18.04.2013 23:02, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 03:41 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> I can't cleanly upgrade my Fedora installation (I use --skip-broken),
>> below is error reported by yum:
>>
>> Resolving Dependencies
>> --> Running transaction check
>> ---> Package febootstrap-superm
On 04/18/2013 03:41 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> I can't cleanly upgrade my Fedora installation (I use --skip-broken),
> below is error reported by yum:
>
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package febootstrap-supermin-helper.x86_64 0:3.20-1.fc17 will be
> obsolet
Am 18.04.2013 22:41, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
> I can't cleanly upgrade my Fedora installation (I use --skip-broken),
> below is error reported by yum:
>
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package febootstrap-supermin-helper.x86_64 0:3.20-1.fc17 will be
> obsole
19 matches
Mail list logo
