Allegedly, on or about 31 August 2016, Christian Stadelmann sent:
> 1. HTTPS Everywhere – force-redirects to HTTPS on a list (whitelist)
> of known sites. Doesn't break much stuff. I think this is a must-have.
Actually, this is one *kind* of thing that I hate, because it causes
breakage all over t
Thanks for sharing this!
Some more addons I use:
1. HTTPS Everywhere – force-redirects to HTTPS on a list (whitelist) of known
sites. Doesn't break much stuff. I think this is a must-have.
2. RequestPolicyContinued – can be configured to disable _all_ requests from
any server but the page source
On 08/27/16 18:32, stan wrote:
Further experience with umatrix
has shown me that the on off button to the left of the vertical line
at the top, completely turns umatrix on or off for a site.
To turn on or off individual cells, it is enough to click in the cell,
and then the result shows under th
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:09:53 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Now I can play with it and see if it will let me view the
> Weatherunderground radar image for Norfolk, actually Wakefield, Va. I
> also had trouble viewing my ISP data usage numbers since I have to
> stay under 25 GB per month I track tha
On 08/27/16 11:58, stan wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 04:09:26 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
After reading this I installed uMatrix and it apparently works well
but for a few sites. the only way I can get any idea of what it is
doint is in Firefox > Tools > Extensions > uMatfix > Logs which can
displ
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 04:09:26 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> After reading this I installed uMatrix and it apparently works well
> but for a few sites. the only way I can get any idea of what it is
> doint is in Firefox > Tools > Extensions > uMatfix > Logs which can
> display a lot of data for the p
On 08/25/16 08:41, Ahmad Samir wrote:
I used to use NoScript up until a couple of years ago when loading
pages took extra time*because of* NoScript which is just irritating.
So I ditched NoScript (which over the years became*too much*) and
switched to other methods to block troublesome javascrip
On 25/08/16 06:41, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 25 August 2016 at 03:14, Tim wrote:
[...]
I used to use NoScript up until a couple of years ago when loading
pages took extra time *because of* NoScript which is just irritating.
So I ditched NoScript (which over the years became *too much*) and
switc
On 25 August 2016 at 03:14, Tim wrote:
[...]
>
> At which point, you may as well have not bothered with using NoScript,
> in the first place. Sure, this half measure has stopped some of the
> nonsense (the other things that would also have loaded), but you're
> still exposed to the risk that many
Allegedly, on or about 23 August 2016, Drew Samson sent:
> I too have found browsing doesn't work without scripting yet still
> find NoScript essential. Here is my typical usage - like 5 minutes ago
> on cnn.com:
>
> Full protection of noscript = page doesn't load. 23 scripts blocked.
>
> 1 click
Just about every site I look at, doesn't work (at all, or usefully)
without scripting. And usually it's not just scripting from the site,
but it's scripting from half a dozen or more different services, some of
which will chainload more crap from yet another set of services. Even
if security w
Allegedly, on or about 23 August 2016, Drew Samson sent:
> Perhaps this will help someone in their quest for greater online
> privacy and enhance their computer security.
If *only* safer browsing didn't have to venture into tinfoil hat
territory... But the moment you start shutting off the hazar
12 matches
Mail list logo
