On Friday 23 July 2010 17:10:27 Nathan Kinder wrote:
> ...the
> X.500 aliases were dropped when we updated the schema to match RFC
> 4519. Please open a bug on this so we can add the X.500 aliases back in.
didit. Plz take care ;)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617629
Peace,
R:
--
On 07/23/2010 07:19 AM, Roberto Polli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it seems that the new 00core.ldif doesn't contain the NAME alias for the
> fields (eg. "cn" "commonName")
>
> it cause other old ldif not to work under new releases of fds.
>
> Why are the aliases have been removed?
>
I don't think that
