[0:root@elmo shorewall]$ grep trouble /etc/{passwd,group}
/etc/passwd:setroubleshoot:x:990:300::/var/lib/setroubleshoot:/sbin/nologin
/etc/group:setroubleshoot:x:300:
[0:root@elmo ~]$ rpm -qf /var/lib/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_database.xml
setroubleshoot-server-3.2.24-1.fc22.x86_64
HTH,
Bill
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:40 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> You can install the "exfat-fuse" package from RPMFusion-free in order
> to mount exFAT disks in Fedora, and fsck/mkfs/etc. are in the
> "exfat-utils" package also in RPMFusion.
Thanks TC!
yum install
ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/rpmfusi
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> F18 here. I thought Linux included support for Microsoft's exFat?
>
> I get "'Unknown filesystem type: exfat' when plugging a Sandisk U3 8GB
> Pen Drive formattted on WinXP with Exfat...
exFAT may be subject to patents [1] and thus cannot
r...@dwf.com wrote:
I set my screen size to 1280x1024 in my xorg.conf
This worked fine up thru Fedora 11 (I dont currently have running copies
of F12 or F13 to test it there) but it DOES NOT WORK in Fedora14.
In Fedora14 I get 1024x768 with or without the xorg.conf.
Now my actual screen is b
xinyou yan wrote:
> I have a freebsd system.
> In my computer /dev/sda10 is a freebsd slice.
>
> I use mount -t ufs /dev/sda10 /tmp
> It fail.
>
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda10,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> In some cases u
Mikkel infinity-ltd.com> writes:
> ...
> What kind of problems would it cause?
>
> > OSs, e.g.
> ># fdisk -l /dev/sda
> >...
> >/dev/sda1 638192015940960048+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> >/dev/sda2 *81920160 11122271914651280 a5 FreeBSD
> >...
> >
On 03/18/2011 10:12 AM, JB wrote:
> JB gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>
> It is apparent that Linux, besides some minor bugs detected here, handles
> *BSD file systems in an awkward way.
> I say *BSD, as I assume that the FreeBSD test results probably appply to
> OpenBSD and NetBSD as well due to s
JB gmail.com> writes:
> ...
It is apparent that Linux, besides some minor bugs detected here, handles
*BSD file systems in an awkward way.
I say *BSD, as I assume that the FreeBSD test results probably appply to
OpenBSD and NetBSD as well due to similarity in their partition/slices
structure of
JB gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> While having that /dev/sda10 (FreeBSD slice) mounted as above, I used cfdisk
> and added /dev/sda10 Linux partition (right after /dev/sda9 of course).
>
> To my surprise, I discovered that after that df and mount do not show that
> FreeBSD /dev/sda10 mounted partit
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:51 AM, xinyou yan wrote:
>
> I do the same with you .Where I can not mount still
>
> fdisk -l
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/sda1 * 16065 92255936 46119936 7 HPFS/NTFS
> /dev/sda2 92256255 459442934 183
I do the same with you .Where I can not mount still
fdisk -l
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1606592255936461199367 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda292256255 459442934 183593340f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/sda3 459442935 6251263
JB gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> What would have happened (as I suggested it previously) if I put that FreeBSD
> /dev/sda10 in /etc/fstab ?
> That new Linux /dev/sda10 partition would be auto mounted at that mount point,
> which would presumably be a source of data for some system or user app ...
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:45 PM, JB wrote:
> Tom H gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Thanks. So Linux starts numbering BSD slices after it's done with its
>> own partitions.
>>
>> I presume that if you create sda10, the slices'll start at sda11...
>
> # fdisk -l /dev/sda
> /dev/sda1 63 819
Tom H gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:55 PM, JB gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tom H gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> You then have to pass the options below when mounting (for slice a)
> >> mount -t ufs -o ro,ufstype=ufs2 /dev/sda5 /path/to/mount/point
> >
> > Thanks Tom.
>
> You're welcom
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/17/2011 10:55 AM, JB wrote:
>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> /dev/sda1 63 81920159 40960048+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
>> /dev/sda2 * 81920160 111222719 14651280 a5 FreeBSD
>> /dev/sd
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:55 PM, JB wrote:
> Tom H gmail.com> writes:
>> You then have to pass the options below when mounting (for slice a)
>> mount -t ufs -o ro,ufstype=ufs2 /dev/sda5 /path/to/mount/point
>
> Thanks Tom.
You're welcome.
> Here is how it worked for me.
>
> # fdisk -l /dev/s
2011/3/17 JB :
> xinyou yan gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> I have a freebsd system.
>> In my computer /dev/sda10 is a freebsd slice.
>>
>> I use mount -t ufs /dev/sda10 /tmp
>> It fail.
>> ...
>
> Are you sure about that device name /dev/sda10 ?
Freebsd need the primary partition . Then i
JB gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> # fdisk -l /dev/sda
> ...
>Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/sda1 638192015940960048+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> /dev/sda2 *81920160 11122271914651280 a5 FreeBSD
> /dev/sda3 111222720 140525279
On 03/17/2011 10:55 AM, JB wrote:
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/sda1 638192015940960048+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> /dev/sda2 *81920160 11122271914651280 a5 FreeBSD
> /dev/sda3 111222720 14052527914651280 83 Linux
>
Tom H gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> To OP: (You can check that Fedora is recognizing the FreeBSD disk with
> "dmesg | grep bsd" but it should be detected by default)
>
> I've never mounted a FreeBSD slice that was on a partition of a Linux
> disk so I'm not sure how that'll work.
>
> With a separ
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:36 AM, JB wrote:
> xinyou yan gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> I have a freebsd system.
>> In my computer /dev/sda10 is a freebsd slice.
>>
>> I use mount -t ufs /dev/sda10 /tmp
>> It fail.
>
> Are you sure about that device name /dev/sda10 ?
> This is a FreeBSD Handbook.
> 18
xinyou yan gmail.com> writes:
>
> I have a freebsd system.
> In my computer /dev/sda10 is a freebsd slice.
>
> I use mount -t ufs /dev/sda10 /tmp
> It fail.
> ...
Are you sure about that device name /dev/sda10 ?
Have you configured that machine or somebody else ?
This is a FreeBSD Handbook
xinyou yan gmail.com> writes:
>
> I have a freebsd system.
> In my computer /dev/sda10 is a freebsd slice.
>
> I use mount -t ufs /dev/sda10 /tmp
> It fail.
>
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda10,
>missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:16:48 +0200
Dj YB wrote:
> On Friday December 10 2010 17:59:26 you wrote:
>
> > Read man setkeycodes . The error messages tell you how to fix
> > them. You just have to decide what you want the key to be mapped to.
>
> thanks,
> but why do I need to this for?
> all the
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:05:49 +0200
Dj YB wrote:
> Hello,
> I see many lines all over the /var/log/messages like the below.
> what is causing this and how do I fix this (if it is a problem) or
> stop this?
[snip]
> Dec 5 14:34:57 localhost kernel: atkbd serio0: Unknown key pressed
> (translated
25 matches
Mail list logo
