On 05/11/2010 10:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I was disappointed when I read through the Go / No Go meeting log tonight
> when I read that we would have to slip. Then I remembered the evidence of
> hard work I observed over the last couple of weeks and thought, that people
> are going to notice
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 22:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Then I thought about it some more and contrasted it to some of the mailing
> list issues with people making mostly negative comments when something goes
> wrong or when people had disagreements. And what I thought is that we don't
> do eno
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:46:54PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Some recent examples I have noticed:
>
> Mike McGrath promptly dealt with an outage on a weekend a week or so ago.
> I assume that Mike has a life and had to stop something he was doing that
> was either fun or needed to be done in
On 05/12/2010 04:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I was disappointed when I read through the Go / No Go meeting log tonight
> when I read that we would have to slip. Then I remembered the evidence of
> hard work I observed over the last couple of weeks and thought, that people
> are going to notice
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I was disappointed when I read through the Go / No Go meeting log tonight
> when I read that we would have to slip. Then I remembered the evidence of
> hard work I observed over the last couple of weeks and thought, that people
> are going
Here Here!
Some great work from folks trying to get this release out the door and
meeting all our release criteria!
I'd like to note all the work of Adam Williamson, James Laska, and
Kamil Páral in the QA group for all their long hours of testing and
managing bugs and blocker issues.
kevin
