Re: ssh forward agent

On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 19:00:06 +0700 Frederic Muller wrote: > Jun 3 18:54:09 host sudo[2371]: pam_ssh_agent_auth: Failed > Authentication: `user' as `user' using /etc/security/authorized_keys > Any idea why this is happening? I check the authorized_keys and it's > there, and it's the same as the

Re: ssh forward agent

> > > Exactly. > > > > > > poc > > > -- > > > > What about "sudo bash" for same result? > > Not the same: > >-i, --login >Run the shell specified by the target user's password > database entry as

Re: ssh forward agent

On 03/06/2025 13:15, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi. On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 22:45:48 +0700 Frederic Muller wrote: On 02/06/2025 21:45, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: AFAIK sudo cannot be configured to authenticate with SSH keys. of course it can. Effectively, a search shows that this i

Re: ssh forward agent

-i, --login Run the shell specified by the target user's password database entry as a login shell. This means that login-specific re‐ source files such as .profile, .bash_profile, or .login will be read by the shell. "sudo bash" will not run th

Re: ssh forward agent

On 03/06/2025 18:32, Frederic Muller wrote: debugging... So I am getting this for the /var/log/auth.log [...] Jun  3 18:54:09 airport1 sudo[2371]: pam_ssh_agent_auth: trying public key file /etc/security/authorized_keys Jun  3 18:54:09 host sudo[2371]: pam_ssh_agent_auth: auth_secure_filenam

Re: ssh forward agent

On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 10:43:37 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote: > On Tue, 2025-06-03 at 15:07 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 11:50 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > > passwordless sudo seems quite risky to me (and seems to defeat the > > > purpose of sudo). > >

Re: ssh forward agent

On Tue, 2025-06-03 at 15:07 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 11:50 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > passwordless sudo seems quite risky to me (and seems to defeat the > > purpose of sudo). > > [...] > Having said that, on my system where I am the sole user, I'll only

Re: ssh forward agent

Hi. On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 22:45:48 +0700 Frederic Muller wrote: > On 02/06/2025 21:45, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: >> AFAIK sudo cannot be configured to authenticate with SSH keys. > of course it can. Effectively, a search shows that this is possible by configuring sudo with pam_ssh_agent_au

Re: ssh forward agent

On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 11:50 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > passwordless sudo seems quite risky to me (and seems to defeat the > purpose of sudo). Yes, and no... If I "sudo something" the password I'm going to type is my own, which I already know. Though it does offer an "are you sure" m

Re: ssh forward agent

On Mon Jun02'25 10:45:48PM, Frederic Muller wrote: > From: Frederic Muller > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:45:48 +0700 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: ssh forward agent > > On 02/06/2025 21:45, francis.montag

Re: ssh forward agent

On 02/06/2025 21:45, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi. On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 21:32:41 +0700 Frederic Muller wrote: I copied the old .ssh from my backup so it's all the same files and I do manage to ssh to the server, just not sudo su. This is thus a change in the sudo configurations, not SS

Re: ssh forward agent

Hi. On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 21:32:41 +0700 Frederic Muller wrote: > I copied the old .ssh from my backup so it's all the same files and I do > manage to ssh to the server, just not sudo su. This is thus a change in the sudo configurations, not SSH. AFAIK sudo cannot be configured to authenticate wi

Re: f42 default background not working

On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 15:28 +0200, François Patte wrote: > Le 02/06/2025 à 15:20, George N. White III a écrit : > > journalctl --no-hostaname -b > > journalctl : option non reconnue (not known) '--no-hostaname' It's a typo. man journalctl: ... --no-hostname Do not show the host

Re: f42 default background not working [SOLVED]

Le 02/06/2025 à 15:09, François Patte a écrit : Bonjour, I upgraded to f42 from f40 using the dnf system upgrade, everything seems to be alright, except the default background which is missing on the logging screen (black) and also when users are logged (white). I use lightdm and all files

Re: f42 default background not working

Le 02/06/2025 à 15:20, George N. White III a écrit : journalctl --no-hostaname -b journalctl : option non reconnue (not known) '--no-hostaname' -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lis

Re: f42 default background not working

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 10:10 AM François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, > > I upgraded to f42 from f40 using the dnf system upgrade, everything seems > to be alright, except the default background which is missing on the > logging screen (black) and also when users are logged (white). > > I use lightdm

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Todd, Thanks very much again! > > > > Oh, I see. I put in the BuildRequires now, but also made > > the changes below. I am not sure I needed to put in the > > BuildRequires but I did it anyway. Btw, it appears to me > > that the Requires should no longer be needed, since the > > image that is th

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Hi, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > On Sun Jun01'25 09:09:55PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> 'ln -s' works because it doesn't actually need the target to >> create the link. If you did a build in mock and then looked >> for the target file in the chroot, it's not there because >> there's no BuildReq

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Todd, Thanks very much for this! On Sun Jun01'25 09:09:55PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > From: Todd Zullinger > Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:09:55 -0400 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim:

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > [As a note, upstream is in trouble because the maintainer > is quite unwell, judging by the ticket responses on the > slimfork site. I hope he recovers well and soon, at least > for his sake.] Yes, I hope they get well soon. > So, I think that there are two option

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Thanks again! On Sun Jun01'25 10:11:16AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > From: Todd Zullinger > Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 10:11:16 -0400 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get start

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

On Sun Jun01'25 04:04:38PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > From: Todd Zullinger > Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 16:04:38 -0400 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started) > >

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > Thank you to both! > > OK, dealing with the pam first, here is the problem. > >> >>> Another point: /etc/pam.d/slim uses pam_console.so that is not >>> provided (any more ?) on F42. >> >> The pam_console.so was removed from pam in Fedora 39: >> >> https://fedor

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Thank you to both! OK, dealing with the pam first, here is the problem. > > > Another point: /etc/pam.d/slim uses pam_console.so that is not > > provided (any more ?) on F42. > > The pam_console.so was removed from pam in Fedora 39: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemovePamConsole >

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jun 2025 07:48:16 +0200 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > >> I don't know slim, but being a display manager, it's him that starts >> Xorg. Look thus for slim traces in the journal, and also in it's >> logfiles: /var/log/slim.log > > I installed sli

Re: lightdm config HELP [SOLVED]

Le 01/06/2025 à 11:02, François Patte a écrit : Bonjour, I have made a great error installing "lightdm-settings" : it is supposed to help to configure the startup screenof lightdm... Not only does it not do what is requested, but it is also impossible to get rid of what it has done. I rem

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Hi, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > Btw, I noticed that 1.4.1 has the following as changelog: > > * Adjusted how/when the pseudo-root window is created and removed, in > preparation for handling multiple monitors in SLiM > * Adjusted slimlock to use the panel class in the way it was

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

On Sun, 01 Jun 2025 07:48:16 +0200 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > I don't know slim, but being a display manager, it's him that starts > Xorg. Look thus for slim traces in the journal, and also in it's > logfiles: /var/log/slim.log I installed slim on a test machine. /var/log/slim.log says:

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Hi. On Sat, 31 May 2025 14:53:50 -0500 Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: >> At the grub menu, add systemd.debug_shell to the kernel parameters. >> Suppress rhgb may also help. >> You will normally get a root shell on tty9. > Before I do this, do I need to have a root account set up? No. > I am ab

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Todd, Thanks very much again! > Maybe, but if it just reports a spurious error, that makes > me think it's something else. It's also why I don't like > ignorable errors. :) I agree, same with warnings. I do not like disregarding them, and want more warnings. > > > The version on slim is sli

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > Todd, > > Thank you for this! > > On Sat May31'25 04:18:49PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> I know nothing about slim, but that seems like a problem. >> The package does include /var/run/slim and has a >> tmpfiles.d config which should recreate it on boot, but >> perha

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Todd, Thank you for this! On Sat May31'25 04:18:49PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > From: Todd Zullinger > Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 16:18:49 -0400 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim:

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > On Sat May31'25 07:48:07AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: >> Then look at the logs from tty9: journalctl -b, /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > I am able to get into one of these machines and was able to look at > /var/log/Xorg.0.log. > > Here it is: > > https://paste

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

ora users > Subject: Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started) > > Hi. > > On Fri, 30 May 2025 15:24:10 -0500 Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > >> I use openbox WM and the SLiM login manager. > > >> I upgraded my F41 -> F42 machines, following

Re: shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

On 5/30/25 17:57, Robert Nichols via users wrote: On 5/30/25 10:23, Barry wrote: On 30 May 2025, at 14:14, Robert Nichols via users wrote: Has anybody actually used this program?  Since it fails for me in two different environments, I can't see how. Well, the "Linux portable tar" vers

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 17:11 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 5/30/25 3:19 AM, Tim via users wrote: >>> On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 20:05 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Also see and t

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 17:11 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/30/25 3:19 AM, Tim via users wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 20:05 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > Also see > > > > > > and the section, "Configure a Vi

Re: iso from usb stick

On 5/30/25 8:33 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/30/25 7:33 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 06:52 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I have a functioning/bootable USB drive.  I want to make an ISO out of it but do not want the extra space included that dd gives I think you'd have

Re: systemd-automount

On Sat, 31 May 2025 10:12:17 +0200 François Patte wrote: > Le 31/05/2025 à 09:52, francis.montag...@inria.fr a écrit: Why do you want that to be done when you log-in ? >> No answer to this question :-( > Just to be sure that everything is working as in the previous install... > so as not to

Re: systemd-automount

Le 31/05/2025 à 09:52, francis.montag...@inria.fr a écrit : On Sat, 31 May 2025 09:34:12 +0200 François Patte wrote: Le 30/05/2025 à 21:46,francis.montag...@inria.fr a écrit : On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:52:06 +0200 François Patte wrote: I would like that the directory should be automounted when I

Re: systemd-automount

On Sat, 31 May 2025 09:34:12 +0200 François Patte wrote: > Le 30/05/2025 à 21:46, francis.montag...@inria.fr a écrit : >> On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:52:06 +0200 François Patte wrote: >>> I would like that the directory should be automounted when I log-in >> The goal of automount, with autofs as well

Re: systemd-automount

Le 30/05/2025 à 21:46, francis.montag...@inria.fr a écrit : On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:52:06 +0200 François Patte wrote: I would like that the directory should be automounted when I log-in The goal of automount, with autofs as well as with systemd.automount, is to do the mount only when you access

Re: systemd-automount

Le 31/05/2025 à 04:35, Tim via users a écrit : Barry: The options include noauto François Patte: Thank you for this remark! I changed to auto and and it doesn't go up either I wonder if your network is up and ready for use by this stage. Do you mean network 192.168 ? Yes it is. F.P

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

Hi. On Fri, 30 May 2025 15:24:10 -0500 Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: >> I use openbox WM and the SLiM login manager. >> I upgraded my F41 -> F42 machines, following the instructions on >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline/ >> to the letter. >> However, the

Re: shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

On 5/30/25 17:57, Robert Nichols via users wrote: Thread 59 "Thread (pooled)" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fe5bbdfe6c0 (LWP 8783)] ___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x4054c348) ... Looks like I'm not alone. I've added this to https://bugzi

Re: iso from usb stick

On 5/30/25 7:33 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 06:52 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I have a functioning/bootable USB drive. I want to make an ISO out of it but do not want the extra space included that dd gives I think you'd have to play with sizing: Shrink the partiti

Re: systemd-automount

Barry: >> The options include noauto François Patte: > Thank you for this remark! I changed to auto and and it doesn't go up > either I wonder if your network is up and ready for use by this stage. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 4 14:43:51 UTC 2024 x86_6

Re: iso from usb stick

On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 06:52 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > I have a functioning/bootable USB drive. I want to make an > ISO out of it but do not want the extra space included > that dd gives I think you'd have to play with sizing: Shrink the partition of the working drive down to what it

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On 5/30/25 3:19 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 20:05 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Also see and the section, "Configure a Virtual Host for the domain". When following such instructions, you have to

Re: shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

On 5/30/25 10:23, Barry wrote: On 30 May 2025, at 14:14, Robert Nichols via users wrote: ___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x2aed4278d06f824f) at pthread_mutex_lock.c:80 80 unsigned int type = PTHREAD_MUTEX_TYPE_ELISION (mutex); That mutex address looks bad. Getting a bac

Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)

On Fri May23'25 04:53:58PM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote: > From: Ranjan Maitra via users > Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 16:53:58 -0500 > To: Community Support for Fedora Users > Cc: Ranjan Maitra > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does n

Re: systemd-automount

On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:52:06 +0200 François Patte wrote: > I would like that the directory should be automounted when I log-in The goal of automount, with autofs as well as with systemd.automount, is to do the mount only when you access the mountpoint. Why do you want that to be done when you lo

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 20:05 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Also see > > and the section, "Configure a Virtual Host for the domain". When following such instructions, you have to be careful about the choice of where y

Re: systemd-automount

On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:52:06 +0200 François Patte wrote: > Le 30/05/2025 à 17:46, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : > On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 16:20 +0100, Barry wrote: > > > >> On 30 May 2025, at 14:05, François Patte wrote: > >>> > >>> Why it is not automaticlly mounted when I loggin? > >>> > >> T

Re: systemd-automount

Le 30/05/2025 à 17:46, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 16:20 +0100, Barry wrote: On 30 May 2025, at 14:05, François Patte wrote: Why it is not automaticlly mounted when I loggin? The options include noauto I was about to say that, but 'noauto' (according to the fstab man p

Re: systemd-automount

On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 16:20 +0100, Barry wrote: > > > On 30 May 2025, at 14:05, François Patte wrote: > > > > Why it is not automaticlly mounted when I loggin? > > The options include noauto I was about to say that, but 'noauto' (according to the fstab man page) means "don't include in 'mount

Re: systemd-automount

> On 30 May 2025, at 16:37, François Patte wrote: > > Thank you for this remark! I changed to auto and and it doesn't go up > either > > Did you reboot to test? I have a less complex line in my /etc/fstab to mount a NFS share. Maybe one of the other options is the problem? ser

Re: systemd-automount

Le 30/05/2025 à 17:20, Barry a écrit : On 30 May 2025, at 14:05, François Patte wrote: Why it is not automaticlly mounted when I loggin? The options include noauto Thank you for this remark! I changed to auto and and it doesn't go up either F.P. -- _

Re: shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

> On 30 May 2025, at 14:14, Robert Nichols via users > wrote: > > ___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x2aed4278d06f824f) > at pthread_mutex_lock.c:80 > 80 unsigned int type = PTHREAD_MUTEX_TYPE_ELISION (mutex); That mutex address looks bad. Getting a back trace will be useful f

Re: systemd-automount

> On 30 May 2025, at 14:05, François Patte wrote: > > Why it is not automaticlly mounted when I loggin? The options include noauto Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.

Re: iso from usb stick

On 5/30/25 12:47 AM, Oliver Ava wrote: To install an ISO from a USB stick, you’ll need to use a tool like Rufus or BalenaEtcher to make the USB bootable—just copying the ISO file won’t work. Once that’s done, restart your computer and use the boot menu (usually F12 or Esc during startup) to sel

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On 30 May 2025 at 19:49, Tim via users wrote: Subject:Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42? To: noloa...@gmail.com, Community support for Fedora users Date sent: Fri, 30 May 2025 19:49:29 +0930 Send reply to

Re: shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

On 5/18/25 00:17, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 11:30 PM Robert Nichols via users wrote: I'm trying to use "shotcut", installed in a Fedora 41 virtual machine, to split up some large mp4 files. It can read the files and play the videos just fine, so there is apparently no d

Re: iso from usb stick

On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 07:47 +, Oliver Ava wrote: > To install an ISO from a USB stick, you’ll need to use a tool like > Rufus or BalenaEtcher to make the USB bootable—just copying the ISO > file won’t work. Neither of them are anything I've heard of. Certainly, you can't just copy the ISO fil

Re: iso from usb stick

To install an ISO from a USB stick, you’ll need to use a tool like Rufus or BalenaEtcher to make the USB bootable—just copying the ISO file won’t work. Once that’s done, restart your computer and use the boot menu (usually F12 or Esc during startup) to select the USB drive. If it doesn’t boot, c

Re: Chrome from Google - have your tabs, except for the active/current one, lost background?

also one another observation - this does _not_ happen Chrome's window is full-screen. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fe

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 6:08 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Barry wrote: > > > > > >> On 29 May 2025, at 16:38, Michael D. Setzer II via users > >> wrote: > >> > >> No need to setup a Virtual Host. Don't know why they don't list this > >> option. > > > > My guess is because almost everyone uses Vi

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > On 29 May 2025 at 18:08, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> And chage the file there means you now have to track future >> changes to it yourself rather than picking them up via the >> normal package updates. > > Don't understand this? Looked at another Fedora system

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

Barry: >>> My guess is because almost everyone uses VirtualHost sections. Todd Zullinger: > > And chage the file there means you now have to track future > > changes to it yourself rather than picking them up via the > > normal package updates. Michael D. Setzer II: > Don't understand this? Looke

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On 29 May 2025 at 18:08, Todd Zullinger wrote: Date sent: Thu, 29 May 2025 18:08:14 -0400 From: Todd Zullinger To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42? Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users > Barry wr

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

Barry wrote: > > >> On 29 May 2025, at 16:38, Michael D. Setzer II via users >> wrote: >> >> No need to setup a Virtual Host. Don't know why they don't list this >> option. > > My guess is because almost everyone uses VirtualHost sections. And chage the file there means you now have to track

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

> On 29 May 2025, at 16:38, Michael D. Setzer II via users > wrote: > > No need to setup a Virtual Host. Don't know why they don't list this > option. My guess is because almost everyone uses VirtualHost sections. Barry -- ___ users mailing list

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

Just to post the solution I found a lot of trial and error. used certbot certonly to create the certificates. Then just make changes to /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf diff ssl.conf ssl.conf.sav 59,60c59,60 < DocumentRoot "/var/www/html" < ServerName setzco.dyndns.org:443 --- > #DocumentRoot "/var/w

Re: nvidia driver and F42 [solved]

> I installed the nvidia driver following the instructions on this page: > > https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/NVIDIA > > install came smoothly *but* the prerequisites are missing and I found them on > > https://github.com/roworu/nvidia-fedora-secureboot > > We must add a key using kmodgenca and mokut

Re: Getting "gpg: WARNING: No valid encryption subkey left over." sometimes running dnf

Michael D. Setzer II: > dnf install /usr/bin/clean-rpm-gpg-pubkey Installed it. > /usr/bin/clean-rpm-gpg-pubkey --dry-run Did a test run, that should show you what it would do, but not actually do it (that dry-run option) > /usr/bin/clean-rpm-gpg-pubkey Actually ran it. > When I ran it cleane

Re: nvidia driver and F42 [solved]

Le 28/05/2025 à 17:24, Marco Moock a écrit : Am 28.05.2025 um 15:23:58 Uhr schrieb François Patte: I installed akamods from rpmfusion and everything seems ok, nouveau is blacklisted in grub but nvidia driver is not loaded and the system falls back to nouveau... How did you install it and which

Re: nvidia driver and F42

Am 28.05.2025 um 15:23:58 Uhr schrieb François Patte: > I installed akamods from rpmfusion and everything seems ok, nouveau > is blacklisted in grub but nvidia driver is not loaded and the system > falls back to nouveau... How did you install it and which card do you have? -- Gruß Marco Send u

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Wed, 2025-05-28 at 11:40 +, J.Witvliet--- via users wrote: > Aren’t longer keys more effective than changing them often? > Especially as a Chinese team of researchers stated that they have broken a > RSA-2048 private key? [Please don't top-post] Certificates expire to reduce the risk from

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

port for Fedora users" mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> Subject: Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42? On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 9:25 AM Tim via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Samuel Sieb: > > If you want a recognized certificate, y

Re: Strange DNS behavior

On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 3:53 PM Dave Close wrote: > The basic issue seems to be that my Internet connection has become > flaky. Provider alleges 45yo wiring is the problem. Tech visit is > scheduled for Tuesday. My mother's house was built in 1960. About 60 years later there were problems with

Re: Getting "gpg: WARNING: No valid encryption subkey left over." sometimes running dnf

> On 28 May 2025, at 12:08, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > > Don't know what encryption subkeys are?? They are a GPG concept. A key can have sub keys. I'm guessing the message means that all the sub keys of all keys were checked. Barry -- ___ user

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 9:25 AM Tim via users wrote: > Samuel Sieb: > > > If you want a recognized certificate, you either have to buy one or > you > > > can use certbot to get a free one from https://letsencrypt.org/. You > > > need to remember to renew it regularly. I think they're valid for

Re: Getting "gpg: WARNING: No valid encryption subkey left over." sometimes running dnf

On 28 May 2025 at 8:48, Barry wrote: From: Barry Subject:Re: Getting "gpg: WARNING: No valid encryption subkey left over." sometimes running dnf Date sent: Wed, 28 May 2025 08:48:14 +0100 To: mi...@guam.

Re: Getting "gpg: WARNING: No valid encryption subkey left over." sometimes running dnf

> On 28 May 2025, at 05:55, Michael D. Setzer II via users > wrote: > > How would one correct this warning?? What rpm was being installed when you got this errror? Is it a Fedora rpm? Or from a third party? Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users

Re: Strange DNS behavior

I wrote: >The basic issue seems to be that my Internet connection has become >flaky. Provider alleges 45yo wiring is the problem. Tech visit is >scheduled for Tuesday. Tech was here and things seem to be working well now. He said the issue was the connectors on the cables, not the cables themselv

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On 5/27/25 5:10 AM, J.Witvliet--- via users wrote: So, for hobby / home websites, certificates with a short lifespan is ok. For anything else, a decent certificate provider should be used… There is no problem for any site to have a short certificate lifespan and that is going to be required w

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

> On 27 May 2025, at 15:29, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > OCSP Stapling fixed the problem. Yes it did, but very few web sites would implement this solution. Therefore the move to short cert life. Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedorapr

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Tue, 2025-05-27 at 10:28 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Not the same thing at all. Asking people to make up new passwords > > according to arcane rules is an open invitation to having weak > > passwords. Renewing certs periodically is a compromise between "never" > > and "constantly". > > Key

Re: I try to install f42....

On Tue, May 27, 2025, at 5:21 AM, François Patte wrote: [snip] > Either what is said is wrong and these pages must go to the dust bin, or > anaconda from f42-xfce-live iso is buggy > > Thank you for attention. I recently updated and tested my "HowTo" if I decide to rebuild my system as UEFI

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

> Am 26.05.2025 um 21:25 schrieb Will McDonald : > > On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 20:05, bruce wrote: > if u have... > /etc/apache2/sites-available/.. there might be multiple conf files for > different weapp projects. these files woul have virtual host configurations > as well as alias direct

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2025-05-27 at 19:59 +0930, Tim via users wrote: >>> If you have it all fully automated, it shouldn't hurt to use >>> the shorter lifetime, but for the purposes being discussed >>> here, it _seems_ like a moot point. >> >> I'm not sure I believe in their automat

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 6:50 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-05-27 at 20:05 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-05-26 at 15:19 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > To reduce the size of Certificate Revocation List (CRL), and recover > > > quickly from a compromised host. Conv

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 1:19 AM Michael D. Setzer II via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > Error code: SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER > > I can add an exception, but would have to have all users do the > same. What is option to create the certificates. > > Just have some basic web page

Re: I try to install f42....

Le 2025-05-26 13:27, Peter Boy Uni a écrit : Am 26.05.2025 um 14:51 schrieb François Patte : Bonjour, I try to make a new install of f42. I want to install it on 2 drives using RAID1, say /dev/sda and /dev/sdb I define partitions /boot/efi, /, swap, /var When definning these partitions, I can

Re: I try to install f42....

Le 2025-05-27 12:21, François Patte a écrit : Le 2025-05-26 13:27, Peter Boy Uni a écrit : Am 26.05.2025 um 14:51 schrieb François Patte : Bonjour, I try to make a new install of f42. I want to install it on 2 drives using RAID1, say /dev/sda and /dev/sdb I define partitions /boot/efi, /, sw

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

mailto:noloa...@gmail.com>>, "Community support for Fedora users" mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> Cc: "Tim" mailto:ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au>> Subject: Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42? On Mon, 2025-05-26 at 15:19 -0400, Jeffrey W

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Tue, 2025-05-27 at 20:05 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2025-05-26 at 15:19 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > To reduce the size of Certificate Revocation List (CRL), and recover > > quickly from a compromised host. Conventional wisdom is, browsers > > don't download CRLs or OCSP, so a sho

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Tue, 2025-05-27 at 19:59 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > > If you have it all fully automated, it shouldn't hurt to use > > the shorter lifetime, but for the purposes being discussed > > here, it _seems_ like a moot point. > > I'm not sure I believe in their automation ideas, at all (having read

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Mon, 2025-05-26 at 15:19 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > To reduce the size of Certificate Revocation List (CRL), and recover > quickly from a compromised host. Conventional wisdom is, browsers > don't download CRLs or OCSP, so a short validity closes the gap in > browser behavior. That's the fi

Re: How to setup certs for https access for Fedora 42?

On Mon, 2025-05-26 at 09:53 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > If so, it looks to be entirely optional: > > Our longer-lived certificates, which currently have a > lifetime of 90 days, will continue to be available > alongside our six-day offering. Subscribers will be able > to opt in

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >