On 06/02/2010 07:25 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 07:52 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> On 01/06/10 23:24, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>> --snip--
>>
>>> I filed a bug report against evolution-remove-duplicates in the Fedora
>>> bugzilla. But maybe it should be in the
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 07:52 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 01/06/10 23:24, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> --snip--
> >
> > I filed a bug report against evolution-remove-duplicates in the Fedora
> > bugzilla. But maybe it should be in the Evolution Bugzilla. Who *is*
> > responsible for this?
> >
>
On 01/06/10 23:24, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
--snip--
>
> I filed a bug report against evolution-remove-duplicates in the Fedora
> bugzilla. But maybe it should be in the Evolution Bugzilla. Who *is*
> responsible for this?
>
you filed the bug they will get it.
But there might be nothing they ca
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 19:55 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> No need to pull out the elitest card.
Elitist? Moi?
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fe
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 15:24 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:24 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > > There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or
> > > missing release IDs. For example:
> > >
On 06/01/2010 06:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Once again: this package is not part of the standard Gnome plugin set
> for Evolution. It's a third-party add-on. In fact it installs in the
> wrong place in F13, under /usr/lib64/evolution/2.28/plugins instead
> of /usr/lib64/evolution/2.30/plug
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 17:31 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > I filed a bug report against evolution-remove-duplicates in the Fedora
> > bugzilla. But maybe it should be in the Evolution Bugzilla. Who*is*
> > responsible for this?
>
> Package maintenance (read the R
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 15:24 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:24 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > > There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or
> > > missing release IDs. For example:
> > >
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> I filed a bug report against evolution-remove-duplicates in the Fedora
> bugzilla. But maybe it should be in the Evolution Bugzilla. Who*is*
> responsible for this?
Package maintenance (read the RPM itself) is the distribution's
responsibility (read Fedora).
Software
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:24 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or
> > missing release IDs. For example:
> > evolution-remove-duplicates-0.0.4-4.fc12.x86_64
> > which is
On 01/06/10 21:05, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
--snip--
>
> Is this harmful? Should it be reported to the Fedora Bugzilla?
>
> Thanks - jon
>
>
Perfectly fine, as there was no mass rebuild for F13.
Nothing to panic about.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
users maili
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or
> missing release IDs. For example:
> evolution-remove-duplicates-0.0.4-4.fc12.x86_64
> which is in fact intended for evolution-2.28, and not for
> evolution-2.
There are a number of packages in the FC13 repos that have wrong or
missing release IDs. For example:
evolution-remove-duplicates-0.0.4-4.fc12.x86_64
which is in fact intended for evolution-2.28, and not for
evolution-2.30, which is included in FC13. (And so it doesn't work)
There are a
13 matches
Mail list logo
