RE: was criminal use of linux [not] -now: ownership

2012-08-02 Thread Patrick Kobly
IANAL, and I suspect you are not either. YMMV - employment law and intellectual property law differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. -Original message- From: Dave Ihnat Sent: Thu 02-08-2012 07:43 Subject:Re: was criminal use of linux [not] -now: ownership To

Re: was criminal use of linux [not] -now: ownership

2012-08-02 Thread Ed Greshko
On 08/02/2012 07:04 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > Hi, you have completely destroyed the attributions here, making it > pretty hard to follow the conversation. Which is good. Since this is kind of useless on this mailing list. -- Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to b

Re: was criminal use of linux [not] -now: ownership

2012-08-02 Thread Dave Ihnat
Once, long ago--actually, on Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 07:26:02PM +1000--Roger (are...@bigpond.com) said: > Er... nobody can take ownership over work that you have written, > Your work is your own, regardless of whether they own the language > you write it in or not. True, unless: 1. You contractu

Re: was criminal use of linux [not] -now: ownership

2012-08-02 Thread Ian Malone
On 2 August 2012 10:26, Roger wrote: Hi, you have completely destroyed the attributions here, making it pretty hard to follow the conversation. Richard Vickery wrote: > Er... nobody can take ownership over work that you have written, Your work > is your own, regardless of whether they own the la