Tom Horsley writes:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:53:27 +0100
Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
> the top row
I think they held a contest to see who could come up with a design to
most effectively hide the controls for evince. Took me
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 17:35:10 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 12/04/18 16:54, stan wrote:
> > I presume they think the
> > learning curve for multiple platform interfaces is more costly than
> > the diminished user interface on larger screens.
> .
> I wonder if a stabdard set of three letter abbrev
On 12/5/18 6:34 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I mean, why on
> Earth would you need a sign next to the M5 to warn people about bad
> umbrellas anyway?
High wind area ahead, obviously.
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default
color scheme
On 12/4/18 1:54 PM, stan wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:28:13 -0500
> Fred Smith wrote:
>
>> there seems to be a widespread desire to make UIs so minimal that
>> no one can figure out how to use them. Not to single out anyone, but
>> the Gnome-3 people seem to be on that bandwagon too. No offens
On 12/04/18 16:54, stan wrote:
I presume they think the
learning curve for multiple platform interfaces is more costly than the
diminished user interface on larger screens.
.
I wonder if a stabdard set of three letter abbreviations might not be
better ...
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, US
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:28:13 -0500
Fred Smith wrote:
> there seems to be a widespread desire to make UIs so minimal that
> no one can figure out how to use them. Not to single out anyone, but
> the Gnome-3 people seem to be on that bandwagon too. No offense meant
> to any particular person(s), it
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:17:28PM -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 12/04/18 14:20, Rick Stevens wrote:
> >I'm using Xfce as well with the LightDM display manager and there's
> >no text associated with the icon, just the icon (which sort of looks
> >like an abstract inkjet printer with a page going t
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:59:40PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:53:27 +0100
> Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>
> > Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
> > the top row
>
> I think they held a contest to see who could come up with a design to
> m
On 12/04/18 14:20, Rick Stevens wrote:
I'm using Xfce as well with the LightDM display manager and there's
no text associated with the icon, just the icon (which sort of looks
like an abstract inkjet printer with a page going through it).
Are the developers running obfuscation contests that we'r
On 12/4/18 11:09 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 12/04/18 13:53, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>> Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
>> the top row
>> /Louis
> .
> Yes that is where I normally find it, I would click on the word "Print"
> in the list that the left-
On 12/4/18 11:06 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
> On 12/4/18 11:01 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> On my evince (V3.30.2), you can click on the hamburger stack
>
>
> And all this time I thought those were pancakes.
Well, I guess you could "insert stacked food of your preference". For
one of our products,
On 12/04/18 13:53, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
the top row
/Louis
.
Yes that is where I normally find it, I would click on the word "Print"
in the list that the left-most icon brings up, but "Print" is no longer
there. Per
On 12/4/18 11:01 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On my evince (V3.30.2), you can click on the hamburger stack
And all this time I thought those were pancakes.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le..
On 12/4/18 10:53 AM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 13:40 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> .
>> In Fedora 29 Evince has no "Print" function despite what its help
>> page
>> says. How can I restore it?
>>
>> Bob
>>
>
> Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon
On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:53:27 +0100
Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
> the top row
I think they held a contest to see who could come up with a design to
most effectively hide the controls for evince. Took me about 20 minutes
to fin
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 13:40 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> .
> In Fedora 29 Evince has no "Print" function despite what its help
> page
> says. How can I restore it?
>
> Bob
>
Printing is there in the menu on the right: it is the leftmost icon in
the top row
/Louis
___
On 12/04/13 19:59, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/04/13 19:16, Tim wrote:
>> Allegedly, on or about 04 December 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
>>> The fact that it fails with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts
>>> package as well would indicate that it isn't a font file issue. In
>>> fact, if you use somethin
On 12/04/13 19:16, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 04 December 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
>> The fact that it fails with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts
>> package as well would indicate that it isn't a font file issue. In
>> fact, if you use something such as the Gnome Character Map you'd see
On 04.12.2013 11:37, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> [egreshko@meimei F20-TC4]$ echo Δ | od -bc
You are running ahead, Ed.
F20 ain't an official, so
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
Allegedly, on or about 04 December 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
> The fact that it fails with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts
> package as well would indicate that it isn't a font file issue. In
> fact, if you use something such as the Gnome Character Map you'd see
> that the character displays prop
On 12/04/13 18:37, Ed Greshko wrote:
> The fact that it fails with the google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts package as
> well would indicate that it isn't a font file issue. In fact, if you use
> something such as the Gnome Character Map you'd see that the character
> displays properly in that app n
On 12/04/13 18:19, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> In looking at the document's properties and selecting the "fonts" tab I
>>> noticed that it was using /usr/share/fonts/google-croscore/SymbolNeu.ttf
>>> for symbols on my F19 system. This comes with the
>>> google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts package. Eras
> >
> > In looking at the document's properties and selecting the "fonts" tab I
> > noticed that it was using /usr/share/fonts/google-croscore/SymbolNeu.ttf
> > for symbols on my F19 system. This comes with the
> > google-croscore-symbolneu-fonts package. Erasing this package resulted in a
> >
On 12/3/2013 8:39 PM, poma wrote:
> On 04.12.2013 02:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> FWIW, the same issue exists in the current F20 Beta. I'll be filling a
>> bugzilla on this.
>
> Getting tired of questioning about what's the bug number.
>
>
> poma
>
>
Easy solution? Stop asking.
--
On 04.12.2013 02:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
> FWIW, the same issue exists in the current F20 Beta. I'll be filling a
> bugzilla on this.
Getting tired of questioning about what's the bug number.
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
On 12/04/13 09:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/27/13 23:18, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
>> but is wrong with evince.
>> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
>> is \Phi.
>>
>> Would you know what
On 11/27/13 23:18, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> but is wrong with evince.
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
> is \Phi.
>
> Would you know what is wrong?
This may be late.
In looking at
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 23:09:57 +1030
Tim wrote:
> Because those applications are written by people who do not know what
> they're doing (*). It's one thing for a poorly written application to
> not bother to insert headers that the programmer didn't understand, so
> that further thread sorting fai
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:20:17AM +0100, poma wrote:
>
...snip..
> Et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus
> nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo.
Those pompous lessons really paid off.
--
Bob Holtzman
Your mail is being r
On 2 December 2013 00:03, David wrote:
>> On 12-1-13 17:03:07 David wrote:
>>> That has been discussed to the ends of the universe. He and several
Agreed, I didn't think Patrick's email at all warranted complaint
except for the purposes of stirring this up again. Anyone with advice
on making sur
Allegedly, on or about 01 December 2013, Edward Martinez sent:
> From my understanding, the thread breaking that has been occurring has
> been caused by using webmail based.
> I don't understand why webmail companies
> Would remove those headers.
Because those applications are written by people wh
On 02.12.2013 01:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/02/13 08:02, David wrote:
>> Patrick,
>>
>> Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen
>> any complaints until recently.
>>
>> If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have
>> a good day.
>>
>
> I'm not an
ndows Phone
From: Garry T. Williams<mailto:gtwilli...@gmail.com>
Sent: 12/1/2013 4:56 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users<mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: evince
On 12-1-13 19:31:47 David wrote:
> So you are telling me that all
On 12-1-13 19:31:47 David wrote:
> So you are telling me that all of this time, while I have been
> dodging flack because mine works and theirs does not, that 'mine'
> works and theirs' does not? Really? Really?
>
> Please tell them. :-)
Actually, this is quite simple. An E-mail message that in
On 12/1/2013 7:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/02/13 08:02, David wrote:
>> Patrick,
>>
>> Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen any
>> complaints until recently.
>>
>> If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have a
>> good day.
>>
>
> I'm not anno
ture to all my emails while it is automatically added ?
> I also checked my setup.
> I have 3 options when repying:
> Add original text message
> Indent original text message
> Always use default from adress.
>
> Only the 2 first ones are checked. Should I check the 3rd one als
On 12/1/2013 7:16 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On 12-1-13 19:05:12 David wrote:
>> On 12/1/2013 5:48 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
>>> On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote: Also, by the way,
>>> Microsoft ignores this RFC in its clients. :-(
>>
>> My client comes from Mozilla. So they igno
On 12/02/13 08:02, David wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen any
> complaints until recently.
>
> If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have a
> good day.
>
I'm not annoyed either, but I would refrain from calling other lis
On 12-1-13 19:05:12 David wrote:
> On 12/1/2013 5:48 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote: Also, by the way,
> > Microsoft ignores this RFC in its clients. :-(
>
> My client comes from Mozilla. So they ignore this crap too? Good for
> them.
Actually, your
nip out the headers supplied by the servers that received his
> message. Then we come to what his message actually supplied:
>
> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:32:17 +0100
> From: "Patrick Dupre"
> Message-ID: <20131201143218.102...@gmx.com>
> MIME-
On 12/1/2013 5:48 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote:
>> Without the required headers, there is no way to do proper threading.
>> It can only come close using Subject header value, date, and time.
>
> By the way, this is spelled out in RFC-2822. See
>
>
ture to all my emails while it is automatically added ?
> I also checked my setup.
> I have 3 options when repying:
> Add original text message
> Indent original text message
> Always use default from adress.
>
> Only the 2 first ones are checked. Should I check the 3rd one als
On 12/02/13 07:46, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I am sorry for the disturbance with my replies.
> It is now 15 years that I use to use mailing list and it is the first
> time that people complains about my replies.
> What should I do ?
> Remove my signature to all my emails while it is automatically add
.
I have 3 options when repying:
Add original text message
Indent original text message
Always use default from adress.
Only the 2 first ones are checked. Should I check the 3rd one also?
Regards.
> Subject: Re: evince
>
> On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > Witho
On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote:
> Without the required headers, there is no way to do proper threading.
> It can only come close using Subject header value, date, and time.
By the way, this is spelled out in RFC-2822. See
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt
Also, by the way, M
0100
From: "Patrick Dupre"
Message-ID: <20131201143218.102...@gmx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: evince
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer
x-registered: 0
X-GMX-UID: JS3pcnxJeSEqJ2u
On 12/1/2013 4:53 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On 12-1-13 13:20:49 David wrote:
>> On 12/1/2013 12:11 PM, poma wrote:
>>> On 01.12.2013 15:32, Patrick Dupre wrote:
So what is the solution ?
>>>
>>> Stop breaking a thread!
>>> Stop top-posting!
>>> Stop spamming us with your address, telephon
On 12-1-13 13:20:49 David wrote:
> On 12/1/2013 12:11 PM, poma wrote:
> > On 01.12.2013 15:32, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >> So what is the solution ?
> >
> > Stop breaking a thread!
> > Stop top-posting!
> > Stop spamming us with your address, telephone and fax numbers!
>
> Two out of three.
>
> 1)
On 12/1/2013 12:11 PM, poma wrote:
> On 01.12.2013 15:32, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> So what is the solution ?
>
> Stop breaking a thread!
> Stop top-posting!
> Stop spamming us with your address, telephone and fax numbers!
>
> Bee awesome.:!
>
>
> poma
>
>
Two out of three.
1) He did top pos
On 01.12.2013 15:32, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> So what is the solution ?
Stop breaking a thread!
Stop top-posting!
Stop spamming us with your address, telephone and fax numbers!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:48 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Humm,
>
> removing wine-symbol-fonts, will remove wine!
> and rootplot, root etc
> I am not sure about such a soluton!!
I know nothing about root (aside from the fact that its documentation
subpackage is ridiculously large), but "yum r
Humm,
removing wine-symbol-fonts, will remove wine!
and rootplot, root etc
I am not sure about such a soluton!!
> - Original Message -
> From: Jonathan Dieter
> Sent: 12/01/13 03:41 PM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: evince
>
> On Sun
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:32 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> So what is the solution ?
>
> I tried fedora 16, fedora 18, fedora 19 (gnome3), all give the same result
> a \Phi is shown when a \Delta should be displayed.
>
> Thank.
I've figured it out. I had wine-symbol-fonts installed, which provid
So what is the solution ?
I tried fedora 16, fedora 18, fedora 19 (gnome3), all give the same result
a \Phi is shown when a \Delta should be displayed.
Thank.
>
> On 11/29/13 08:36, Tim wrote:
> > Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
> >> One interesting thing I discovered,
On 11/29/13 08:36, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
>> One interesting thing I discovered, at least on my F19 system, is if I
>> highlight (copy) the Phi and then paste it into a terminal the
>> resulting character is a delta.
> That seriously points to it bein
Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
> One interesting thing I discovered, at least on my F19 system, is if I
> highlight (copy) the Phi and then paste it into a terminal the
> resulting character is a delta.
That seriously points to it being a broken font, then.
What's on th
On 11/29/13 01:48, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> We do already, don't we? With the feedback from the various users of
> Fedora 18, 19 and 20, where the Delta displays correctly, it seems to boil
> down to a configuration issue. Mission objective would be to find out what
> changes an installation to
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:44:59 +0100, poma wrote:
> On 27.11.2013 18:38, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>
> > The document shows up correctly for me, in both evince and okular.
> >
>
> Can we finally agree on anything!?
> LoL!
We do already, don't we? With the feedback from the various users of
Fedora 18, 1
On 27 November 2013 12:18, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> but is wrong with evince.
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
> is \Phi.
>
> Would you know what is wrong?
Do you've a screenshoot of what shoul
On 11/27/2013 03:45 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 18:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
but is wrong with evince.
The correct character is a \D
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:20:35 +0100, poma wrote:
> On 27.11.2013 18:12, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > It's a delta symbol here.
> >
> > $ rpm -q evince
> > evince-3.10.3-1.fc20.x86_64
>
> U2 should know better after years of use.
> F20 ain't an official, so
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On 27.11.2013 18:45, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> FWIW, on Fedora 19+updates, it's a phi symbol. I'm running the standard
> Gnome 3 desktop.
>
> $ rpm -q evince
> evince-3.8.3-2.fc19.x86_64
Here's become rare to see f19.
You're the man!
LoL!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@list
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 18:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> > but is wrong with evince.
> > The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong charact
On 27.11.2013 18:38, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> The document shows up correctly for me, in both evince and okular.
>
Can we finally agree on anything!?
LoL!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On 27.11.2013, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> but is wrong with evince.
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
> is \Phi.
The document shows up correctly for me, in both evince and okular.
--
users maili
On 27.11.2013 18:19, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> OK, in fedora 18, it is
> evince-3.6.1-2.fc18.x86_64.
> Is it the reason?
Now you're breaking a thread, too.
LoL!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.
On 27.11.2013 18:12, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It's a delta symbol here.
>
> $ rpm -q evince
> evince-3.10.3-1.fc20.x86_64
U2 should know better after years of use.
F20 ain't an official, so
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
> - Original Message -
> From: Michael Schwendt
> Sent: 11/27/13 06:12 PM
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: evince
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The viewing ot the attac
>
> What are you. Asking.. I am not getting
Should I set up something to have the correct viewing?
I cannot use it with "wrong" character while I think that
evince would be helpfull for some purpose.
In one word I would like to use evince, but because the
displaying is wrong, I just cannot use
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> but is wrong with evince.
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
> is \Phi.
>
> Would you know what is wrong?
It's a delta sym
What are you. Asking.. I am not getting
-Original Message-
From: "Patrick Dupre"
Sent: 27-11-2013 08:48 PM
To: "fedora"
Subject: evince
Hello,
The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
but is wrong with evince.
The correct character is a \Delta with the wr
On 27.11.2013 16:18, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> but is wrong with evince.
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
> is \Phi.
>
> Would you know what is wrong?
https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evin
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:28 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
> just because I pushed a Reply to all and not a simple Reply... :-(
Well the "post to this list, only" message is more about the original
poster than the respondent. But it does highlight yet another problem
with the "reply to all" feature not
2011/9/26 Tim :
> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 06:45 +, g wrote:
>> when posting to tech support;
>>
>> }> To: Community support for Fedora users
>>
>>
>> }> Cc: Fedora List
>>
>>
>> please use one or other address, not both.
>>
>>
>> proper address is;
>>
>> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> Actu
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 06:45 +, g wrote:
> when posting to tech support;
>
> }> To: Community support for Fedora users
>
>
> }> Cc: Fedora List
>
>
> please use one or other address, not both.
>
>
> proper address is;
>
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Actually, the fedora-l...
On 09/25/2011 08:03 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
<>
when posting to tech support;
}> To: Community support for Fedora users
}> Cc: Fedora List
please use one or other address, not both.
proper address is;
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
thank you.
--
peace out.
tc.hago,
g
.
**
Bob Goodwin ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 25/09/2011
19:42:
>
> Suddenly I can't print the Sunday crossword puzzles! Firefox
> prints the pdf files via evince and something has gone wrong
> there. I have two Brother laser printers, an HL-5124 and an
>
This appears to have been fixed upstream
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=606090
So it should be possible to get the Fedora maintainer to update with the fix.
I've created a bug in the RH bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626410
Danny.
On 23 August 2010 12:24, Germán
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:14 +0200, Marco Guazzone wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Danny Yee wrote:
> > Upgrading from F12 to F13 was really smooth, but there a couple of
> > very annoying regressions.
> >
> > Every time I open a PDF using evince (document viewer), I get a small
> > wind
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Danny Yee wrote:
> Upgrading from F12 to F13 was really smooth, but there a couple of
> very annoying regressions.
>
> Every time I open a PDF using evince (document viewer), I get a small
> window in the top left of my screen, which I have to resize to be
> usabl
80 matches
Mail list logo
