On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 18:49, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> >> 3. Also, the codecs you're using aren't part of Fedora, since Fedora
> >> has intellectual property issues with ugly codecs, so you might
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 18:49, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
>>> 3. Also, the codecs you're using aren't part of Fedora, since Fedora
>>> has intellectual property issues with ugly codecs, so you might get
On 29 March 2011 18:49, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
>> 3. Also, the codecs you're using aren't part of Fedora, since Fedora
>> has intellectual property issues with ugly codecs, so you might get
>> better support from the original source.
>>
>> I use F
On 29 March 2011 18:48, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 10:31 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
>> 3. Also, the codecs you're using aren't part of Fedora, since Fedora
>> has intellectual property issues with ugly codecs, so you might get
>> better support from the original source.
>
> 4. Or, you can go here,
On 29 March 2011 18:31, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
>>
>> I was unfamiliar with Warnock's Dilemma. Thanks for sharing. I suspect
>> the reason you find yourself on this dilemma's horns might be:
>>
>> 1. No one else has run into this.
>> 2. People are wait
On 29 March 2011 18:29, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
>
>>> Has anyone else experienced anything like this? Are there any other
>>> tests I can carry out to work out what the differences are?
>>
>> Warnocked :-(
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warnock%2
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> 3. Also, the codecs you're using aren't part of Fedora, since Fedora
> has intellectual property issues with ugly codecs, so you might get
> better support from the original source.
>
> I use Fluendo's codecs, and hadn't seen this problem, sorry
On 03/29/2011 10:31 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> 3. Also, the codecs you're using aren't part of Fedora, since Fedora
> has intellectual property issues with ugly codecs, so you might get
> better support from the original source.
4. Or, you can go here, http://www.dnmouse.org/autoten/ and get the
fed
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
>
> I was unfamiliar with Warnock's Dilemma. Thanks for sharing. I suspect
> the reason you find yourself on this dilemma's horns might be:
>
> 1. No one else has run into this.
> 2. People are waiting to see what else you do to troubleshoot, like:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
>> Has anyone else experienced anything like this? Are there any other
>> tests I can carry out to work out what the differences are?
>
> Warnocked :-(
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warnock%27s_Dilemma
I was unfamiliar with Warnock's Dilemma
On 23 March 2011 16:35, Dave Cross wrote:
> I'm using Fedora 14 and I think I have the correct RPMs installed in
> order for Rhythmbox to play MP3s.
>
> $ rpm -q rhythmbox
> rhythmbox-0.13.3-1.fc14.i686
> $ rpm -q gstreamer-plugins-ugly
> gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.16-2.fc14.i686
>
> This set up
I'm using Fedora 14 and I think I have the correct RPMs installed in
order for Rhythmbox to play MP3s.
$ rpm -q rhythmbox
rhythmbox-0.13.3-1.fc14.i686
$ rpm -q gstreamer-plugins-ugly
gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.16-2.fc14.i686
This set up works fine for the vast majority of MP3s that I have. But
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
