One option is simply to have all your hosts use your own DNS server.
You may want to run a second slave server.
Now you will be authoritative for your internal domain and it will
answer for outside zones as well - very probably faster than your ISP
anyway.
gene
--
users mailing list
use
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 00:26 -0800, Michael Hannon wrote:
> In fact, my resolv.conf DID have an entry for my system, but it was in
> reverse order. I.e., to use your example, it was:
>
> search my.lan
> nameserver
> nameserver 192.168.1.72
>
> I don't understand why the resolver d
>> I don't understand why the resolver didn't fall through to the second
>> nameserver, but it evidently did not. After I put the nameservers in the
>> order you suggest, everything seems to be working fine!
> Because the multiple servers are only good for the first server failing.
> Once the fir
>> Another good suggestion. I had forgotten about the immutable attribute.
>> I've set it now. (It's a safe bet that in six months or so I'll be sending
>> a note to the list, whining about how I can't edit resolv.conf ;-)
> Suggestion: take off the immutable bit, now, add a comment saying that
On 11/13/2011 12:26 AM, Michael Hannon wrote:
> Another good suggestion. I had forgotten about the immutable
> attribute. I've
> set it now. (It's a safe bet that in six months or so I'll be sending a
> note
> to the list, whining about how I can't edit resolv.conf ;-)
Suggestion: take off the
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:26:12 -0800 (PST)
Michael Hannon wrote:
> I don't understand why the resolver didn't fall through to the second
> nameserver, but it evidently did not. After I put the nameservers in the
> order you suggest, everything seems to be working fine!
Because the multiple servers
>> Greetings. I just installed Fedora 16 (x86_64) on my home computer today.
>> Not an altogether pleasant experience so far, I must say.
>>
>> I've got one issue in particular that's really puzzling me.
[...]
>> I.e., the "host" utility CAN resolve the name, as can the "dig"
>> utility (not sho
On 11/13/11 00:29, Michael Hannon wrote:
> Greetings. I just installed Fedora 16 (x86_64) on my home computer today.
> Not an altogether pleasant experience so far, I must say.
>
> I've got one issue in particular that's really puzzling me. I use my
> linux
> box as a nameserver for a few other c
Greetings. I just installed Fedora 16 (x86_64) on my home computer today.
Not an altogether pleasant experience so far, I must say.
I've got one issue in particular that's really puzzling me. I use my linux
box as a nameserver for a few other computers at our house, just to save
myself the troub
