Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2016, Richard Ibbotson sent:
> Switched off some plugins. I think that's done it.
Try re-enabling, one by one, to narrow it down. I think you need to, to
ensure that you don't have a compromised system.
It could be something as simple as a plug-in looking for an u
Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Strange
>
> Are you saying you have control of 195.154.162.172? That is the
> system with port 21 open.
>
> You showed...
>
> tcp 0 0 192.168.2.10:60088195.154.162.172:21
>
> The source port of 192.168.2.10 is 60088 connecting
2.172:21 starts up
> after starting a web browser. Kind of sounds like I'm being tracked.
> I've checked all of the settings. Can't see anything in the browser
> that relates to the FTP port. I'll have a look at firewall settings. As
> far as I know port 21 is blo
On 3/4/2016 4:40 PM, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
I'll have a look at firewall settings. As far as I know port 21 is
blocked. Strange
Most firewalls are configured to block _incoming_ traffic. Not many
default system configurations block _outbound_ traffic and I can't
remember a time I ever load
On 03/04/2016 01:40 PM, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
On Friday 04 March 2016 12:00:55 Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/04/2016 11:44 AM, Tim wrote:
Oh, and just because it's using port 21 doesn't necessarily mean
that it's doing FTP, that's just the recognised common use of the
port. If you're infiltrated, it
On Saturday 05 March 2016 06:14:56 Tim wrote:
> Are you doing *any* kind of peer-to-peer?
>
No. All P2P switched off.
--
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Cod
On Friday 04 March 2016 12:00:55 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/04/2016 11:44 AM, Tim wrote:
> > Oh, and just because it's using port 21 doesn't necessarily mean
> > that it's doing FTP, that's just the recognised common use of the
> > port. If you're infiltrated, it could be doing anything. You,
> > mo
On 03/04/2016 11:44 AM, Tim wrote:
Oh, and just because it's using port 21 doesn't necessarily mean that
it's doing FTP, that's just the recognised common use of the port. If
you're infiltrated, it could be doing anything. You, most likely, need
to be more concerned about what process is using
Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2016, Richard Ibbotson sent:
> netstat -nap | grep :21 shows
>
> tcp0 0 192.168.2.10:60088 195.154.162.172:21
> ESTABLISHED
>
> netstat -aunt shows...
>
> tcp0 0 192.168.2.10:60088 195.154.162.172:21
> ESTABLI
2016-03-04 13:45 GMT+02:00 Richard Ibbotson :
> Hi
>
> Does anyone know what this might be about ? Fedora 23 with a
> Gnome/KDE/LXDE desktop...
>
> netstat -nap | grep :21 shows
>
> tcp0 0 192.168.2.10:60088 195.154.162.172:21
> ESTABLISHED
>
> netstat -aunt shows...
>
> tcp
On 03/04/2016 03:45 AM, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
Hi
Does anyone know what this might be about ? Fedora 23 with a
Gnome/KDE/LXDE desktop...
netstat -nap | grep :21 shows
tcp0 0 192.168.2.10:60088 195.154.162.172:21
ESTABLISHED
netstat -aunt shows...
tcp0 0 1
On Mar 4 20:21, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> On 03/04/16 19:45, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Does anyone know what this might be about ? Fedora 23 with a
> > Gnome/KDE/LXDE desktop...
> >
> > netstat -nap | grep :21 shows
> >
> > tcp0 0 192.168.2.10:60088 195.154.162
On 03/04/16 19:45, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone know what this might be about ? Fedora 23 with a
> Gnome/KDE/LXDE desktop...
>
> netstat -nap | grep :21 shows
>
> tcp0 0 192.168.2.10:60088 195.154.162.172:21
> ESTABLISHED
>
> netstat -aunt shows...
>
Hi
Does anyone know what this might be about ? Fedora 23 with a
Gnome/KDE/LXDE desktop...
netstat -nap | grep :21 shows
tcp0 0 192.168.2.10:60088 195.154.162.172:21
ESTABLISHED
netstat -aunt shows...
tcp0 0 192.168.2.10:60088 195.154.162.172:21
14 matches
Mail list logo
